Viewing child porn not a risk factor for future sex offenses: study

July 14, 2009

For people without a prior conviction for a hands-on sex offense, the consumption of child pornography alone does not, in itself, seem to represent a risk factor for committing such an offense. Researchers writing in the open access journal BMC Psychiatry studied 231 men convicted of consuming child pornography in 2002 and found that only 1% had gone on to commit a hands-on sex offense in the following six years.

Frank Urbaniok from the Canton of Zurich Department of Justice, Switzerland, worked with a team of researchers to investigate these consumers. He said: "When investigating the prevalence of internet consumption, an important practical question is whether consumers of child pornography pose a risk for hands-on sex offenses. Our results support the assumption that these consumers, in fact, form a distinct group of sex offenders. Probably, the motivation for consuming child pornography differs from the motivation to physically assault minors. Furthermore, the recidivism rates of 1% for hands-on and 4% for hands-off sex offenses were quite low."

As has been found in other studies, Urbaniok and colleagues were able to corroborate that the offenders were well educated and that most consumed other types of illegal pornography as well, such as pornography depicting sexual acts with animals, excrement, or involving brutality.

Commenting on the findings, Urbaniok said: "Due to the widespread use of the internet, child pornography consumers today may differ from our sample in some socio-economic aspects, such as in the level of education or level of income. Nevertheless, there are two relevant and practical findings that seem to be robust: For consumers of child pornography without a criminal history, the prognosis for hands-on sex offenses and for recidivism with child pornography is favourable."

More information: The consumption of Internet child pornography and violent and sex offending; Jérôme Endrass, Frank Urbaniok, Lea C Hammermeister, Christian Benz, Thomas Elbert, Arja Laubacher and Astrid Rossegger; BMC Psychiatry (in press), www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpsychiatry/

Source: BioMed Central (news : web)

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Illusion reveals that the brain fills in peripheral vision

December 8, 2016

What we see in the periphery, just outside the direct focus of the eye, may sometimes be a visual illusion, according to new findings published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

THEY
not rated yet Jul 14, 2009
Lets let these perverts move to HIS neighborhood then.

But then maybe he doesn't have children, or is one himself......
Mandan
not rated yet Jul 14, 2009
If people were viewing images made commercially of other human beings being murdered for sex thrills or profit, would they not be considered guilty of being accomplices? Children have to be raped to make these images. Therefore anyone who views them is an accomplice to raping a child. I say they should all be publicly tortured and executed.
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Jul 15, 2009
Sexual offenders in disguise talk rubbish like that.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.