Our own status affects the way our brains respond to others

April 28, 2011

Our own social status influences the way our brains respond to others of higher or lower rank, according to a new study reported online on April 28 in Current Biology. People of higher subjective socioeconomic status show greater brain activity in response to other high-ranked individuals, while those with lower status have a greater response to other low-status individuals.

These differences register in a key component of the brain's value system, a region known as the ventral striatum.

"The way we interact with and behave around other people is often determined by their social status relative to our own, and therefore information regarding social status is very valuable to us," said Caroline Zink of the National Institute of Mental Health. "Interestingly, the value we assign to information about someone's particular status seems to depend on our own status."

The findings in humans are largely consistent with earlier observations in . Researchers had shown that monkeys direct their attention to others of higher or lower status depending on their own position in the troop.

Zink's team wanted to know whether this principle holds in humans. They used (MRI) to measure in the ventral striatum while research participants of varying social status were shown information about someone of relatively higher status and information about someone of relatively lower status. Those studies showed that the brain's response to status cues varied depending on an individual's own subjective status.

"The value that we place on particular status-related information—evident by the extent our brain's value centers are activated—is not the same for everyone and is influenced, at least in part, by our own subjective socioeconomic status," Zink said.

The findings surely have important implications for our social behavior and social lives, she added. After all, humans, like all social animals, determine appropriate actions toward others based on an assessment of their social status.

Zink said that socioeconomic status isn't based solely on money but can also include factors such as accomplishments and habits. Socioeconomic status is also just one hierarchical system among many that humans belong to and that can influence our everyday interactions.

And of course, our isn't fixed; it shifts over time, for better or for worse. Exactly how the will respond to such changes is an intriguing question for future study.

"As humans, we have the capacity to assess our surroundings and context to determine appropriate feelings and behavior," Zink said. "We, and our brain's activity, are not static and can adjust depending on the circumstances. As one's status changes, I would expect that the value we place on status-related information from others and corresponding brain activity in the ventral striatum would also change."

More information: Ly et al.: “Subjective Socioeconomic Status Predicts Human Ventral Striatal Responses to Social Status Information. Current Biology - May 10, 2011 print issue


Related Stories

Recommended for you

The brain needs cleaning to stay healthy

May 26, 2016

Research led by the Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), and the Ikerbasque Foundation has revealed the mechanisms that keep the brain clean during neurodegenerative diseases.

Mimicking deep sleep brain activity improves memory

May 26, 2016

It is not surprising that a good night's sleep improves our ability to remember what we learned during the day. Now, researchers at the RIKEN Brain Science Institute in Japan have discovered a brain circuit that governs how ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

210
not rated yet Apr 28, 2011

"As humans, we have the capacity to assess our surroundings and context to determine appropriate feelings and behavior,"
THANK GOD, fate, luck, whatever you want to thank, for The boxer Muhammed ALI, thanks for Ghandi, Martin Luther King, Einstein, Mother Theresa of Calcutta, Madame Curie, Hannibal of Carthage, Borjigin Temüji and on, and on, and on, because they REJECTED the alleged superiority of some other human being, especially so called ROYALTY, to such an extent that they should in any way be submissive to them.(OH YES, these are/were REAL humans so they made mistakes-and who does NOT, but, they also made the world a richer place for their presence.)
Yes, this article simply confirms the 'sheep' mentality that can reside in all of us...a grim reminder to be aware of such tendencies, and question the things we do and say and think to avoid spineless group-think!
-word-to-ya-muthas-

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.