Study suggests 'hard to read' fonts may increase reading retention

by Bob Yirka report
Study suggests 'hard to read' fonts may increase reading retention

(Medical Xpress) -- Researchers from Indiana University and Princeton, in a paper published in Cognition, describe two experiments they conducted that appear to show reading retention improves when fonts that are considered harder to read are used.

In the study, as described by lead author, Connor Diemand-Yauman in an interview with ABC Radio National, a first group of volunteers, comprised of 28 adults, were asked to read some fictional text and then were asked questions about the characters involved afterwards. The volunteers were divided into three groups, with each being given the same text but printed in a different font; the first got 16-point Arial, the second 12-point Comic Sans MS and the third 12-point Bodoni MT. The group that had the so-called hard to read Comic Sans outperformed the other two on the questions given afterwards.

In the second study, the volunteers were high school students (over 220 of them, from six separate groups) reading normal course material in different fonts; some of which were considered hard to read, such as Comic Sans or Monotype Corsiva. Once again, those that were reading the material printed in the more difficult to read fonts outperformed those reading easier type on tests given afterwards.

Diemand-Yauman says these experiments show that people tend to remember what they’ve read better if the material given is in a hard to read font.

What’s not discussed in the paper, however, is if it was possible that the results achieved were due simply to the newness of the fonts to the readers, thus heightening their awareness, or what criteria was chosen in deciding which fonts should be considered as “hard to read.” Many fans of Comic Sans, for example might argue that it’s actually easier to read than say Arial, or Callibri, both of which are considered easy to read by most in the mainstream.

Also, if what the study suggests is true, might it be possible to integrate such fonts as Comic Sans into textbooks, or journals (or on the web) to help improve retention, and hopefully overall learning, or would such hard to fonts cause excessive eyestrain and headaches?

In either case, it’s clear that this research has opened the door to a new area of learning science that will no-doubt lead to more studies which will hopefully clear up such questions and in the end provide us all with the best font for whatever we might be reading.

More information: Fortune favors the bold (and the Italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes, Cognition, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.012

Abstract
Previous research has shown that disfluency – the subjective experience of difficulty associated with cognitive operations – leads to deeper processing. Two studies explore the extent to which this deeper processing engendered by disfluency interventions can lead to improved memory performance. Study 1 found that information in hard-to-read fonts was better remembered than easier to read information in a controlled laboratory setting. Study 2 extended this finding to high school classrooms. The results suggest that superficial changes to learning materials could yield significant improvements in educational outcomes.

Related Stories

No Speeding Reading with eBooks?

Jul 07, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Many think that ebooks could change the way we interact with the written word. They are convenient, and ereaders provide mobility -- as well as the ability to store thousands of books in a ...

Recommended for you

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

xstos
5 / 5 (1) Jun 01, 2011
I hate hard to read fonts. I set firefox to override every font with tahoma (both serif and sans serif) and my enjoyment increases immensely.
trantor
5 / 5 (1) Jun 01, 2011
there is one problem with this study. People were ASKED to read the text. So people tried hard to read the texts with difficult to read fonts, and obviously, since they had to pay more attention, they could remember the text better.

But what the study forgot to verify, is if people, in their normal lifes, would try so hard to read texts with difficult to read fonts!

When confronted with some texts in REALLY hard fonts, like Gothic fonts and some others, where its hard to even identify caracthers, I usually give up on reading them.

I suppose however that a medieval monk would have an easier time reading a text in gothic font than in Comic Sans or Arial.
RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Jun 02, 2011
The 'hard to read' status quickly evaporates as one habituates to it, so novelty is the key. Compare Medieval fonts (eg Gothic), for instance, which is only just legible to the uninitiated but can be read fluently by those familiar with it.

Trantor is on the money in my opinion.