American snacking habits to blame for obesity: study

July 1, 2011 by Deborah Braconnier in Health report

snacks

(Medical Xpress) -- In a new study published in PLoS Medicine, researchers have shown that it is not only the American habit of “super-sizing” meals that is leading to obesity, but the number of snacks and meals that are being eaten throughout the day.

The study, led by professor of nutrition Barry Popkin from the University of North Carolina, looked at data from food studies conducted as far back as the 1970s and discovered that Americans have increased their daily caloric intake. In 1977-78, Americans were consuming on average 1,803 kcal and in 2003-06 that number had jumped up to 2,374.

The study examined the amount of calories in a specific amount of food, portion sizes that were consumed and how many snacks and meals were consumed within a day. Looking at the results, the researchers concluded that and the amount of meals and snacks eaten are the biggest factors responsible for the change.

According to the numbers, the number of daily meals and snacks in 1977 were 3.8 but rose to 4.8 in 2006. However, the top 10 percent of surveys showed that the number of meals and were as high as seven per day. It appears that in the last few years, portion size seems to be stabilizing, however the total number of calories consumed is increasing. A main reason behind this is the daily consumption of more than 220 more calories consumed daily from soft drinks than in years past.

While many diet and health advice over the years has suggested eating more frequent small meals, it appears the idea of eating more frequently was understood but the foods chosen are not correct. Eating small, frequent meals can boost your metabolism and control hunger more than eating three big meals a day, however, if these smaller are high-calorie and salty options, the benefits are not seen.

According to the Centers for Disease Control, as many as 25 percent of Americans are obese and these findings suggest that a new focus needs to be placed on portion size and snacking habits in order to reduce those numbers.

More information: Duffey KJ, Popkin BM (2011) Energy Density, Portion Size, and Eating Occasions: Contributions to Increased Energy Intake in the United States, 1977–2006. PLoS Med 8(6): e1001050. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001050

Abstract
Competing theories attempt to explain changes in total energy (TE) intake; however, a rigorous, comprehensive examination of these explanations has not been undertaken. Our objective was to examine the relative contribution of energy density (ED), portion size (PS), and the number of eating/drinking occasions (EOs) to changes in daily TE. Using cross-sectional nationally representative data from the Nationwide Food Consumption Survey (1977–78), Continuing Survey of Food Intakes of Individuals (1989–91), and National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (1994–98 and 2003–06) for adults (aged ≥19 y), we mathematically decompose TE (kcal/d) to understand the relative contributions of each component—PS (grams/EO), ED (kcal/g/EO) and EO(number)—to changes in TE over time. There was an increase in TE intake (+570 kcal/d) and the number of daily EOs (+1.1) between 1977–78 and 2003–06. The average PS increased between 1977–78 and 1994–98, then dropped slightly between 1994–98 and 2003–06, while the average ED remained steady between 1977–78 and 1989–91, then declined slightly between 1989–91 and 1994–98. Estimates from the decomposition statistical models suggest that between 1977–78 and 1989–91, annualized changes in PS contributed nearly 15 kcal/d/y to increases in TE, while changes in EO accounted for just 4 kcal/d/y. Between 1994–98 and 2003–06 changes in EO accounted for 39 kcal/d/y of increase and changes in PS accounted for 1 kcal/d/y of decline in the annualized change in TE. While all three components have contributed to some extent to 30-y changes in TE, changes in EO and PS have accounted for most of the change. These findings suggest a new focus for efforts to reduce energy imbalances in US adults.

© 2010 PhysOrg.com

5 /5 (3 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

FroShow
Jul 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Does anyone else think that the overabundance and types of food we have today lay in stark contrast to what our species have evolved to expect?
I've become increasingly convinced that the 'hunter-gatherer' diet would be the healthiest option.
sherriffwoody
Jul 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Does anyone else think that the overabundance and types of food we have today lay in stark contrast to what our species have evolved to expect?
I've become increasingly convinced that the 'hunter-gatherer' diet would be the healthiest option.

Agreed, and even more, a hunter gatherer diet that revolves your ancestors ate, what your genes are suited too, e.g an inuit eats what his body has evolved to eat, high fat protien diets, not a man made highly processed bowl of pasta containing tonnes of flour.
Highly processed foods (mainly those of containing processed carbohydrates e.g. sugar and flour) are the main cause of modern obesity.
You just have to look at the trend
1. today we eat less than those of 50 years ago
2. they ate more natural foods 50 years ago
3. In the last 50 years there has been an increase in sugar and flour in the diet
4. in the last 50 years obesity has risen in relation to the increase of processed carbs
-and all the while we get told fat causes fat????
Destor
Jul 02, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Contrary to what this article is suggesting though, it's not increased snacking and excess calories that are causing obesity, it's the carbs. Snacking is fine if you're limiting carb intake, that's what it really comes down to.

Of course snacking foods tend to be high carb, sans beef jerky and other snackable meat products, so it might be safe to accuse snacking in some way.
FroShow
Jul 02, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
@Destor; Carbs ARE calories. Limiting carbohydrate intake is the same as limiting caloric intake. Ie) what the article is pointing at.

What I think you're getting at though, is that nutrition is also important. I agree with this because proper nutrition can help regulate hunger, which in turn affects caloric intake.
ryggesogn2
Jul 03, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Limiting carbohydrate intake is the same as limiting caloric intake

Not quite. The key is how much insulin is stimulated.
ryggesogn2
Jul 04, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
"Dr. Broer said the study also revealed an influence of protein in our nutrition on insulin release, which controls the metabolism of sugar and fat in our bodies."
http://www.physor...firstCmt
FroShow
Jul 04, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Limiting carbohydrate intake is the same as limiting caloric intake

Not quite. The key is how much insulin is stimulated.

Yes quite.
A [small / (large, kilogram, dietary, or food)] calorie is the amount of energy needed to change 1[g/kg] of water by 1degree Celcius.
Energy in (in the form of food, ie, carbohydrates (complex sugars)) must equal energy out (heat, work, and chemical energy still left in your waste).
Introducing insulin is a distraction from the point made. Besides, your quote supports the second part of my previous comment:
...nutrition is also important. I agree with this because proper nutrition can help regulate hunger, which in turn affects caloric intake.
ryggesogn2
Jul 04, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Energy is created by metabolizing protein and fat, too.

How is insulin a distraction? Carbohydrates spike blood sugar which triggers and insulin response. Its not a good thing if your cells are insulin resistant from eating too many carbs.

Ever wonder why people feel hungry 2 hours after stuffing themselves at the Chinese buffet? It's the rapid drop in blood sugar after digesting that rice and lo mein.

BTW, humans can survive without carbohydrates. They cannot survive without fats and proteins.
FroShow
Jul 04, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
"insulin is a distraction..." because introducing it does not negate any previous comment, or change the points made in the article: "...researchers concluded that portion size and the amount of meals and snacks eaten are the biggest factors responsible for the change."

Everything you said is correct. I was merely defending my statement and trying not to let people misinterpret what the article is saying.
ryggesogn2
Jul 04, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
.researchers concluded that portion size and the amount of meals and snacks eaten are the biggest factors responsible for the change

But no comment on the content, which IS significant, and is apparently ignored.
The photo above shows high carb snacks and the USDA guidelines promote high carb diets.
If those snacks were beef jerky and nuts, they story may be quite different.
FroShow
Jul 04, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
4th paragraph of the article.
Rank 5 /5 (3 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

CDC presents recent trends in health behaviors of US adults

(HealthDay)—In 2008 to 2010, the prevalence of key health behaviors among U.S. adults varied, with about one in five adults current smokers and 62.1 percent overweight or obese, according to a report presented ...

Health created 2 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Americans still making unhealthy choices, CDC reports

(HealthDay)—The overall health of Americans isn't improving much, with about six in 10 people either overweight or obese and large numbers engaging in unhealthy behaviors like smoking, heavy drinking or ...

Health created 2 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

US court strikes down Arizona 20-week abortion ban

A federal court in San Francisco Tuesday struck down Arizona's ban on abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

Health created 2 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Aggressive behavior linked specifically to secondhand smoke exposure in childhood

Children who are exposed to secondhand smoke in early childhood are more likely to grow up to physically aggressive and antisocial, regardless of whether they were exposed during pregnancy or their parents have a history ...

Health created 5 hours ago | popularity 1 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Most elite athletes believe doping substances are effective in improving performance

Most elite athletes consider doping substances "are effective" in improving performance, while recognising that they constitute cheating, can endanger health and entail the obvious risk of sanction. At the same time, the ...

Health created 6 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


New sleeping pill poised to hit US markets

An experimental sleeping pill from US drug company Merck is effective at helping people fall and stay asleep, according to reviewers at the US Food and Drug Administration, which could soon approve the new drug.

Researchers find genetic risk factor for pulmonary fibrosis

A paper recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine and co-written by physicians and scientists at the University of Colorado School of Medicine finds that an important genetic risk factor for pulmonary fibros ...

Biomarkers discovered for inflammatory bowel disease

Using the Department of Defense Serum Repository (DoDSR), University of Cincinnati (UC) researchers have identified a number of biomarkers for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which could help with earlier diagnosis and ...

Changing cancer's environment to halt its spread

By studying the roles two proteins, thrombospondin-1 and prosaposin, play in discouraging cancer metastasis, a trans-Atlantic research team has identified a five-amino acid fragment of prosaposin that significantly reduces ...

Biodegradable stent proves non-inferior to drug-eluting stent

The Orsiro stent, which is a novel stent platform eluting sirolimus from a biodegradable polymer, demonstrated non-inferiority to the Xience Prime everolimus-eluting stent for the primary angiographic endpoint of in-stent ...

Reducing caloric intake delays nerve cell loss

Activating an enzyme known to play a role in the anti-aging benefits of calorie restriction delays the loss of brain cells and preserves cognitive function in mice, according to a study published in the May ...