Beauty is in the medial orbito-frontal cortex of the beholder, study finds

Beauty is in the medial orbito-frontal cortex of the beholder, study finds
Husbands bringing their ugly wives to a windmill to be transformed into beautiful ones. Engraving by P Fürst, c.1650. Credit: Wellcome Library, London.

(Medical Xpress) -- A region at the front of the brain 'lights up' when we experience beauty in a piece of art or a musical excerpt, according to new research funded by the Wellcome Trust. The study, published today in the open access journal PLoS One, suggests that the one characteristic that all works of art, whatever their nature, have in common is that they lead to activity in that same region of the brain, and goes some way to supporting the views of David Hume and others that beauty lies in the beholder rather than in the object.

"The question of whether there are characteristics that render objects beautiful has been debated for millennia by artists and philosophers of art but without an adequate conclusion," says Professor Semir Zeki from the Wellcome Laboratory of Neurobiology at UCL (University College London). "So too has the question of whether we have an abstract sense of , that is to say one which arouses in us the same powerful regardless of whether its source is, for example, musical or visual. It was time for neurobiology to tackle these fundamental questions."

Twenty-one volunteers from different cultures and rated a series of paintings or excerpts of music as beautiful, indifferent or ugly. They then viewed these pictures or listened to the music whilst lying in a () scanner, which measures activity in the brain.

Professor Zeki and colleague Dr Tomohiro Ishizu found that an area at the front of the brain known as the medial orbito-frontal cortex, part of the pleasure and reward centre of the brain, was more active in subjects when they listened to a piece of music or viewed a picture which they had previously rated as beautiful. By contrast, no particular region of the brain correlated generally with artwork previously rated 'ugly,' though the experience of visual ugliness when contrasted with the experience of beauty did correlate with activation in a number of regions.

The medial orbito-frontal cortex has previously been linked to appreciation of beauty, but this is the first time that scientists have been able to show that the same area of the brain is activated for both visual and auditory beauty in the same subjects. This implies that beauty does, indeed, exist as an abstract concept within the brain.

The medial orbito-frontal cortex was not the only region to be activated by beauty. As might be expected, the visual cortex, which responds to visual stimuli, was more active when viewing a painting than when listening to music, and vice versa for the auditory cortex.

However, particularly interesting was that activity in another region, the caudate nucleus, found near the centre of the brain, increased in proportion to the relative visual beauty of a painting. The caudate nucleus has been reported previously to correlate with romantic love, suggesting a neural correlate for the relationship between beauty and love.

Professor Zeki adds, "Almost anything can be considered art, but we argue that only creations whose experience correlates with activity in the medial orbito-frontal cortex would fall into the classification of beautiful art.

"A painting by Francis Bacon, for example, may have great artistic merit but may not qualify as beautiful. The same can be said for some of the more 'difficult' classical composers – and whilst their compositions may be viewed as more 'artistic' than rock music, to someone who finds the latter more rewarding and beautiful, we would expect to see greater activity in the particular region when listening to Van Halen than when listening to Wagner."

Professor Zeki was the recipient of a £1million Wellcome Trust Strategic Award in 2007 to establish a programme of research in the new field of 'neuroaesthetics' in search of the neural and biological basis for creativity, beauty and love. The research brings together science, the arts and philosophy to answer fundamental questions about what it means to be human.

More information: Ishizu T and Zeki S. Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS One 2011 [epub ahead of print] dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021852

Related Stories

Love: it's all the same to the brain

Jan 04, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- There are no differences between heterosexuals and homosexuals or between women and men in terms of the brain systems regulating romantic love, according to new UCL research published in the ...

A bird's eye view of art

Jun 30, 2009

Pigeons could be art critics yet, according to a new study which shows that like humans, pigeons can be trained to tell the difference between 'good' and 'bad' paintings. According to Professor Shigeru Watanabe from Keio ...

Picower research finds unexpected activity in visual cortex

Mar 16, 2006

For years, neural activity in the brain's visual cortex was thought to have only one job: to create visual perceptions. A new study by researchers at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory shows that visual cortical ...

Feelings matter less to teenagers

Sep 07, 2006

Teenagers take less account than adults of people’s feelings and, often, even fail to think about their own, according to a UCL neuroscientist. The results, presented at the BA Festival of Science today, show that teenagers ...

Recommended for you

Researchers track down cause of eye mobility disorder

4 hours ago

Imagine you cannot move your eyes up, and you cannot lift your upper eyelid. You walk through life with your head tilted upward so that your eyes look straight when they are rolled down in the eye socket. ...

How kids' brain structures grow as memory develops

5 hours ago

Our ability to store memories improves during childhood, associated with structural changes in the hippocampus and its connections with prefrontal and parietal cortices. New research from UC Davis is exploring ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Noumenal
not rated yet Jul 06, 2011
Umm, how does the title follow from their conclusion? Yes, beauty generates a feeling of pleasure, even fools could tell you that much, though this is after the initial judgement. The faculty of judgement, or the recognition of the beautiful, still seems to be hiding somewhere. The connection in the caudate nucleus is the far more interesting observation, and far more deserving to be in the title.
Ramael
not rated yet Jul 07, 2011
Yes, beauty generates a feeling of pleasure, even fools could tell you that much, though this is after the initial judgement. The faculty of judgement, or the recognition of the beautiful, still seems to be hiding somewhere.


It seems to me that the association/judgement of art and pleasure occur in the orbito-frontal cortex. After all, it already seems pivotal in empathetic recognition in others, as well as relating to rewarding to punishing circumstances. Essentially all three share a common characteristic, relating the self to the outside world. A crucial characteristic for any organism, hence having an entire region of the brain dedicated to it, but are also all typically well defined in humans relative to other species, which makes sense giving our linguistic/communicative abilities.

In short, your statement of initial judgement is overcomplicated, and these processes are far more likely to occur within proximity of each other to ensure effective functioning.
Ramael
not rated yet Jul 07, 2011
However that could suggest that we may have multiple centers of judgement, and that decisions of beauty and every day decisions may be governed by completely separate parts of the brain. After all, one may decide to go to the grocery store, which is a rational thought, but deciding whether one likes one design over another feels like a completely different kind of mental effort, something more emotional and less conceptual. Perhaps theres a good reason for that.
gmurphy
not rated yet Jul 11, 2011
Maybe the reason ugliness had no single salient neural response is because we perceive it as the lack of beauty, rather than an intrinsic property of the subject.