California nurse staffing

In a comprehensive analysis comparing nurse staffing in California hospitals to similar hospitals in the U.S. over nearly a decade, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing have found that controversial legislation setting nurse-to-patient ratios added more registered nurses to the hospital staffing mix, not fewer as feared.

California was the first state to pass setting staffing levels. However, mindful of the ongoing nurse shortage California legislators determined that hospitals could employ licensed practical nurses (LPN) as well as registered nurses (RN) to meet the requirements of the law.

Nevertheless, "California's state–mandated nurse staffing ratios have been shown to be successful in terms of increasing registered nurse staffing. From a policy perspective, this should be useful information to the states currently debating legislation on nurse-to-patient ratios," wrote lead researcher Matthew McHugh, a nursing professor at the University of Pennsylvania, in the current issue of the prestigious policy journal Health Affairs.

Currently, Massachusetts is considering enacting similar legislation that would set the maximum number of patients assigned to each nurse, varying by the needs of the patient. For example, the intensive care unit would be set at a lower level of patients per nurse than the medical-surgical ward.

California, the researchers wrote, experienced a more serious nurse shortage than other areas of the country but made up the gap by hiring "travel nurses"—temporary workers who move from hospital to hospital as needed and not less educated LPNs. The researchers examined hiring practices from 1997 to 2008, pre- and post- implementation of the legislation, concluding that the increase in nurse staffing did not come at the expense of decreasing RNs.

"Our findings demonstrate that the nurse-to-patient ratio mandate in California was effective in increasing registered nurse staffing in hospitals," wrote Dr.McHugh.

Previous Penn research showed that nurse overload affects patient safety. For every patient added to a nurse's workload of four, the patient's risk of dying goes up by seven percent, even for everyday surgeries. And that if New Jersey and Pennsylvania had enacted the same legislation as California, there would have been 14 percent fewer patient deaths in New Jersey and 11 percent fewer deaths in Pennsylvania, saving hundreds of lives for the period studied.

More information: Health Aff July 2011 vol. 30 no. 7 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1118

Provided by University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

RN staffing affects patient success after discharge

Apr 26, 2011

Higher non-overtime staffing levels of registered nurses lower the probability of patient readmissions to the hospital, a new study finds. However, higher levels of RN overtime increase the likelihood of unplanned ...

Hospital nurses dissatisfied with health benefits

Feb 14, 2011

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have found that nearly 41 per cent of nurses working in American hospitals and health-care settings were dissatisfied with their health-care benefits. The figure is more than ...

Recommended for you

Why aren't there any human doctors in Star Wars?

Jan 30, 2015

Though set "a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away," it isn't hard to see in the Star Wars films a vision of our own not so distant future. But Anthony Jones, a physician with a long background in health ...

Cambodia bans 'virgin surgery' adverts

Jan 29, 2015

The Cambodian government has ordered a hospital to stop advertising so-called virginity restoration procedures, saying it harms the "morality" of society.

What's happening with your donated specimen?

Jan 28, 2015

When donating blood, plasma, human tissue or any other bodily sample for medical research, most people might not think about how it's being used. But if you were told, would you care?

Amgen tops Street 4Q forecasts

Jan 27, 2015

Amgen Inc. cruised to a 27 percent jump in fourth-quarter profit and beat Wall Street expectations, due to higher sales of nearly all its medicines, tight cost controls and a tax benefit.

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.