Study shows willpower traits appear to be lifelong for some people

by Bob Yirka report

(Medical Xpress) -- In an interesting and unique study, researchers have followed up on an experiment conducted several decades ago designed to point out the varying levels of willpower in nursery school age children. Back then, the children were given either a marshmallow or cookie and told if they held off eating it, they’d get another a little while later when the researcher returned. Now adults, some of those original subjects have been tested again, this time using reactions to faces in photographs instead of an edible treat; and lo and behold, even after forty years, the results were very nearly the same. Those that showed willpower as youngsters, did so again as adults, while those that showed little willpower back then didn’t appear to gain any in the interim. The team, led by B.J. Casey and comprised of psychology researchers from a variety of universities, has published the results of their study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In the original study, 500 children at Stanford University’s Bing Nursery school took part in the experiment conducted by Walter Mischel; in the new study, 59 of the original participants were asked to volunteer again. Though in the second go round, rather than being offered sweets the participants were asked to look at a computer screen displaying a slide show of people’s faces. Some of the expressions on the faces were happy, some were unemotional, and some were clearly unhappy. The participants were asked to push a button when the happy faces were shown, the idea being that grownup people tend to gravitate towards people who are happy and smiling, and thus want to push that button.

In monitoring the button pushing and comparing it to the actual images on the screen, the researchers were able to see that some of the volunteers had more trouble keeping themselves from pushing the button even when the face they were looking at wasn’t smiling or looking happy; a result the team says, that shows a lack of willpower. And as it turned out, those showing the most difficulty in holding their buttons still for the less than happy pictures were the same people who as nursery school children, chose to eat the first cookie, rather than wait so they could have a second.

The team also managed to get brain scans of 26 of the participants and found differences in the parts of the brain that is normally associated with desires and rewards, which backed up their findings.

The team points out in their paper that the volunteers chosen from the original group were those who fell on the more extreme ends of the willpower scale as children and thus the results of the study might be skewed. They also point out that their numbers are meant to show averages for people and are not meant to imply that every person who demonstrates willpower, or a lack thereof, as a child, will be the same as an adult. Instead they suggest their results indicate possible trends and that further research on people whose has changed over the years should shed more light on the subject and perhaps offer those who find themselves at the mercy of their whims some means of help.

More information: Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later, PNAS, Published online before print August 29, 2011, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108561108

Abstract
We examined the neural basis of self-regulation in individuals from a cohort of preschoolers who performed the delay-of-gratification task 4 decades ago. Nearly 60 individuals, now in their mid-forties, were tested on “hot” and “cool” versions of a go/nogo task to assess whether delay of gratification in childhood predicts impulse control abilities and sensitivity to alluring cues (happy faces). Individuals who were less able to delay gratification in preschool and consistently showed low self-control abilities in their twenties and thirties performed more poorly than did high delayers when having to suppress a response to a happy face but not to a neutral or fearful face. This finding suggests that sensitivity to environmental hot cues plays a significant role in individuals’ ability to suppress actions toward such stimuli. A subset of these participants (n = 26) underwent functional imaging for the first time to test for biased recruitment of frontostriatal circuitry when required to suppress responses to alluring cues. Whereas the prefrontal cortex differentiated between nogo and go trials to a greater extent in high delayers, the ventral striatum showed exaggerated recruitment in low delayers. Thus, resistance to temptation as measured originally by the delay-of-gratification task is a relatively stable individual difference that predicts reliable biases in frontostriatal circuitries that integrate motivational and control processes.

Related Stories

Need a study break to refresh? Maybe not, say researchers

Oct 14, 2010

It could happen to students cramming for exams, people working long hours or just about anyone burning the candle at both ends: Something tells you to take a break. Watch some TV. Have a candy bar. Goof off, tune out for ...

Does clenching your muscles increase willpower?

Oct 18, 2010

The next time you feel your willpower slipping as you pass that mouth-watering dessert case, tighten your muscles. A new study in the Journal of Consumer Research says firming muscles can shore up self-control.

A hormone that enhances one's memory of happy faces

Jul 28, 2008

Oxytocin was originally studied as the "milk let-down factor," i.e., a hormone that was necessary for breast-feeding. However, there is increasing evidence that this hormone also plays an important role in social bonding ...

Rough day at work? You won't feel like exercising

Sep 24, 2009

Have you ever sat down to work on a crossword puzzle only to find that afterwards you haven't the energy to exercise? Or have you come home from a rough day at the office with no energy to go for a run?

Recommended for you

Updating memory for fact and fiction

1 hour ago

Sunlight can make people sneeze. Sounds ludicrous? But it's true - it's called a photic sneeze reflex, and can occur in about one out of four people. Did you believe that fingerprints are unique to each individual? That, ...

Wide-faced men negotiate nearly $2,200 larger signing bonus

1 hour ago

Having a wider face helps men when they negotiate for themselves but hurts them when they are negotiating in a situation that requires compromise. Additionally, men who are more attractive are better collaborators compared ...

Can you be addicted to the internet?

1 hour ago

A McMaster researcher is trying to understand how much time people spend online – and whether their habits pose a danger to their physical or mental health.

Controlling childbirth pain tied to lower depression risk

10 hours ago

Controlling pain during childbirth and post delivery may reduce the risk of postpartum depression, writes Katherine Wisner, M.D., a Northwestern Medicine® perinatal psychiatrist, in a July 23 editorial in Anesthesia & An ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

pauljpease
not rated yet Aug 30, 2011
Does this really measure willpower, or lack thereof? Sounds rather contrived. And also sounds more like a test of intelligence, which is probably also correlated with willpower anyways.
RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Aug 30, 2011
Willpower is keeping a forty year old marshmallow in your pocket?...I'd rather have a fresh one just the same...
Yogaman
5 / 5 (1) Aug 31, 2011
Hmm. They tested the most extreme children, then concluded that change is unlikely. Doesn't the researchers' selection of subjects precisely determine the expected outcome?

The children who start nearer the median would seem more likely to eventually cross it.
zeplinair
not rated yet Sep 04, 2011
The adult test seems more a test of attention than "willpower" to me, and especially since they chose to test the more extreme subjects, I wouldn't be surprised if there was a corelation, that attention deficit would distract from pursuit of goal (hence losing the battle to immediate reward), but I find this followup to the original study insufficient to answer the question and very flawed - if anything you want to knock out the extremes in measures instead of selectively mining subjects almost guaranteeing these convenient results-but far from indicating the generalized trend across the spectrum.