How your brain reacts to mistakes depends on your mindset
September 30, 2011 in Psychology & Psychiatry
(Medical Xpress) -- Whether you think you can or think you can't -- you're right, said Henry Ford. A new study, to be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, finds that people who think they can learn from their mistakes have a different brain reaction to mistakes than people who think intelligence is fixed.
One big difference between people who think intelligence is malleable and those who think intelligence is fixed is how they respond to mistakes, says Jason S. Moser, of Michigan State University, who collaborated on the new study with Hans S. Schroder, Carrie Heeter, Tim P. Moran, and Yu-Hao Lee. Studies have found that people who think intelligence is malleable say things like, When the going gets tough, I put in more effort or If I make a mistake, I try to learn and figure it out. On the other hand, people who think that they cant get smarter will not take opportunities to learn from their mistakes. This can be a problem in school, for example; a student who thinks her intelligence is fixed will think its not worth bothering to try harder after she fails a test.
For this study, Moser and his colleagues gave participants a task that is easy to make a mistake on. They were supposed to identify the middle letter of a five-letter series like MMMMM or NNMNN. Sometimes the middle letter was the same as the other four, and sometimes it was different. Its pretty simple, doing the same thing over and over, but the mind cant help it; it just kind of zones out from time to time, Moser says. Thats when people make mistakesand they notice it immediately, and feel stupid.
While doing the task, the participant wore a cap on his or her head that records electrical activity in the brain. When someone makes a mistake, their brain makes two quick signals: an initial response that indicates something has gone awryMoser calls it the oh crap responseand a second that indicates the person is consciously aware of the mistake and is trying to right the wrong. Both signals occur within a quarter of a second of the mistake. After the experiment, the researchers found out whether people believed they could learn from their mistakes or not.
People who think they can learn from their mistakes did better after making a mistake in other words, they successfully bounced back after an error. Their brains also reacted differently, producing a bigger second signal, the one that says I see that Ive made a mistake, so I should pay more attention Moser says.
The research shows that these people are different on a fundamental level, Moser says. This might help us understand why exactly the two types of individuals show different behaviors after mistakes. People who think they can learn from their mistakes have brains that are tuned to pay more attention to mistakes, he says. This research could help in training people to believe that they can work harder and learn more, by showing how their brain is reacting to mistakes.
Provided by
Association for Psychological Science
-
When robots learn from our mistakes
May 26, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Our brains have multiple mechanisms for learning
Jul 14, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Ostracism hurts -- but how? Shedding light on a silent, invisible abuse
Apr 28, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Tips on creating a winning holiday letter: professor of communication
Dec 15, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Making decisions is the third way we learn, research shows
Oct 11, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Motion perception revisited: High Phi effect challenges established motion perception assumptions
Apr 23, 2013 |
3 / 5 (2) |
2
-
Anything you can do I can do better: Neuromolecular foundations of the superiority illusion (Update)
Apr 02, 2013 |
4.5 / 5 (11) |
5
-
The visual system as economist: Neural resource allocation in visual adaptation
Mar 30, 2013 |
5 / 5 (2) |
9
-
Separate lives: Neuronal and organismal lifespans decoupled
Mar 27, 2013 |
4.9 / 5 (8) |
0
-
Sizing things up: The evolutionary neurobiology of scale invariance
Feb 28, 2013 |
4.8 / 5 (10) |
14
-
How can there be villous adenoma in colon, if there are no villi there
16 hours ago
-
How can there be a term called "intestinal metaplasia" of stomach
May 21, 2013
-
Pressure-volume curve: Elastic Recoil Pressure don't make sense
May 18, 2013
-
If you became brain-dead, would you want them to pull the plug?
May 17, 2013
-
MRI bill question
May 15, 2013
-
Ratio of Hydrogen of Oxygen in Dessicated Animal Protein
May 13, 2013
- More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences
More news stories
'Boys will be boys' in US, but not in Asia
A new study shows there is a gender gap when it comes to behavior and self-control in American young children – one that does not appear to exist in children in Asia.
Psychology & Psychiatry
6 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Brain can be trained in compassion, study shows
Until now, little was scientifically known about the human potential to cultivate compassion—the emotional state of caring for people who are suffering in a way that motivates altruistic behavior.
Psychology & Psychiatry
7 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
|
Good marriage can buffer effects of dad's depression on young children
What effect does a father's depression have on his young son or daughter? When fathers report a high level of emotional intimacy in their marriage, their children benefit, said a University of Illinois study.
Psychology & Psychiatry
8 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
American, Nepalese kids a world apart on social duties
(Medical Xpress)—Preschoolers universally recognize that one's choices are not always free – that our decisions may be constrained by social obligations to be nice to others or follow rules set by parents ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
15 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Ethicists' behavior not more moral, study finds
(Medical Xpress)—Do ethicists engage in better moral behavior than other professors? The answer is no. Nor are they more likely than nonethicists to act according to values they espouse, according to researchers from the ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
15 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Slowing the aging process—only with antibiotics
Swiss scientists reveal the mechanism responsible for aging hidden deep within mitochondria—and dramatically slow it down in worms by administering antibiotics to the young.
Researchers complete largest genetic sequencing study of human disease
Researchers from Queen Mary, University of London have led the largest sequencing study of human disease to date, investigating the genetic basis of six autoimmune diseases.
Having both migraines, depression may mean smaller brain
(HealthDay)—Migraines and depression can each cause a great deal of suffering, but new research indicates the combination of the two may be linked to something else entirely—a smaller brain.
Novel approach for influenza vaccination shows promise in early animal testing
A new approach for immunizing against influenza elicited a more potent immune response and broader protection than the currently licensed seasonal influenza vaccines when tested in mice and ferrets. The vaccine ...
Enzyme-activating antibodies revealed as marker for most severe form of rheumatoid arthritis
In a series of lab experiments designed to unravel the workings of a key enzyme widely considered a possible trigger of rheumatoid arthritis, researchers at Johns Hopkins have found that in the most severe ...
Research offers promising new approach to treatment of lung cancer
Researchers have developed a new drug delivery system that allows inhalation of chemotherapeutic drugs to help treat lung cancer, and in laboratory and animal tests it appears to reduce the systemic damage ...
Sep 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The "two types of individuals" exist in ONE person.
Concrete:
The person playing the piano REPEATS the incorrect played passage until correct.
The person playing the piano in concert CONTINUES with the score REGARDLESS of incorrect playing.
The greatest learning occurs when mistakes lose consequence and stigma.
The research shows that an INDIVIDUAL is different on a fundamental level.
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
How young ambitious capoes and soldiers from Italian Institute of Technology (IIT) under supervision of a decrepit american don-godfather from Northwestern University are successfully completed their sequential plagiaristic enterprise: http://issuu.com/...saivaldi
Oct 04, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
So why are you spamming the hell out of this site with what your own link shows is a false accusation.
I hit five of his posts this way. I think that enough he has dozens of identical posts and his own link shows his accusations are false.
Ethelred