Scientists discover an organizing principle for our sense of smell

September 26, 2011 in Neuroscience

The fact that certain smells cause us pleasure or disgust would seem to be a matter of personal taste. But new research at the Weizmann Institute shows that odors can be rated on a scale of pleasantness, and this turns out to be an organizing principle for the way we experience smell. The findings, which appeared today in Nature Neuroscience, reveal a correlation between the response of certain nerves to particular scents and the pleasantness of those scents. Based on this correlation, the researchers could tell by measuring the nerve responses whether a subject found a smell pleasant or unpleasant.

Our various sensory organs are have evolved patterns of organization that reflect the type of input they receive. Thus the receptors in the , in the back of the eye, are arranged spatially for efficiently mapping out visual coordinates. The structure of the , on the other hand, is set up according to a tonal scale. But the organizational principle for our has remained a mystery: Scientists have not even been sure if there is a scale that determines the organization of our smell organ, much less how the arrangement of on the membranes in our nasal passages might reflect such a scale.

A team headed by Prof. Noam Sobel of the Weizmann Institute's Neurobiology Department set out to search for the principle of organization for smell. Hints that the answer could be tied to pleasantness had been seen in research labs around the world, including that of Sobel, who had previously found a connection between the of an odor molecule and its place on a pleasantness scale. Sobel and his team thought that smell receptors in the nose – of which there are some 400 subtypes – could be arranged on the nasal membrane according to this scale. This hypothesis goes against the conventional view, which claims that the various smell receptors are mixed -- distributed evenly, but randomly, around the membrane.

In the experiment, the researchers inserted electrodes into the nasal passages of volunteers and measured the nerves' responses to different smells in various sites. Each measurement actually captured the response of thousands of smell receptors, as these are densely packed on the membrane. The scientists found that the strength of the nerve signal varies from place to place on the membrane. It appeared that the receptors are not evenly distributed, but rather, that they are grouped into distinct sites, each engaging most strongly with a particular type of scent. Further investigation showed that the intensity of a reaction was linked to the odor's place on the pleasantness scale. A site where the nerves reacted strongly to a certain agreeable scent also showed strong reactions to other pleasing smells and vice versa: The nerves in an area with a high response to an unpleasant odor reacted similarly to other disagreeable smells. The implication is that a pleasantness scale is, indeed, an organizing principle for our smell organ.

But does our sense of smell really work according to this simple principle? Natural odors are composed of a large number of – roses, for instance, release 172 different odor molecules. Nonetheless, says Sobel, the most dominant of those determine which sites on the membrane will react the most strongly, while the other substances make secondary contributions to the scent.

'We uncovered a clear correlation between the pattern of nerve reaction to various smells and the pleasantness of those smells. As in sight and hearing, the receptors for our sense of smell are spatially organized in a way that reflects the nature of the sensory experience,' says Sobel. In addition, the findings confirm the idea that our experience of smells as nice or nasty is hardwired into our physiology, and not purely the result of individual preference. Sobel doesn't discount the idea that individuals may experience smells differently. He theorizes that cultural context and personal experience may cause a certain amount of reorganization in smell perception over a person's lifetime.

More information: DOI: 10.1038/nn.2926

Provided by Weizmann Institute of Science search and more info website

5 /5 (1 vote)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

gwrede
Sep 26, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Oh, boy. We are supposed to be at the very bleeding edge of olfactory
sceinece, and it never crosses their mind that the question between pleasant and unpleasant may not be a simple genes vs. mind.

To me, it appears that some smells are hard wired, e.g. the smell of vomit, or rotten fish. These are seriously unpleasant even if you have never smelled them before. But then there are unpleasant smells that vary between individuals. In my neighborhood it's a specific apple wine, which most of us had too much of in our teenage. Those can't stand the mere scent of that wine, even as adults. You may have your own example of this.

The perception of smell also depends on the situation. After a way too heavy meal, people can't stand the smell of greasy fried food, but when hungry, it's the sweetest of smells. On the other hand, no kid likes the taste of red wine, but some adults have acquired a taste for it.
djxatlanta
Sep 26, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The primary focus of this experiment was to determine how smell receptors are arranged in the nose -- whether they are randomized or structured, and the finding was that they are indeed structured and ordered by pleasantness. The examples you bring up regarding situational aversions to some odors were not covered by this experiment.
hush1
Sep 27, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
"As in sight and hearing, the receptors for our sense of smell are spatially organized in a way that reflects the nature of the sensory experience,..." - Noam Sobel


Well obviously the origin or nature of sensory experience is physical.

"Hardwiring" is weird. As if the brain exhibits the least of all 'hardwiring' and the further away you venture from the brain the 'harder' the "hardwiring" becomes.

Any 'randomization' of a structure meant to trans-form/port energy (the physical) to anything we are willing to label and attribute as a 'brain' makes no sense.
Where randomization has a chance, "hardwiring" will have the least to say:
the brain.
Rank 5 /5 (1 vote)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Reducing caloric intake delays nerve cell loss

Activating an enzyme known to play a role in the anti-aging benefits of calorie restriction delays the loss of brain cells and preserves cognitive function in mice, according to a study published in the May ...

Neuroscience created 2 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

B vitamins could delay dementia

(Medical Xpress)—Despite spending billions of dollars on research and development, drug companies have been unable to come up with effective treatments for dementia and Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Now, A. ...

Neuroscience created 6 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (6) | comments 0 | with audio podcast report

Waiting for a sign? Researchers find potential brain 'switch' for new behavior

You're standing near an airport luggage carousel and your bag emerges on the conveyor belt, prompting you to spring into action. How does your brain make the shift from passively waiting to taking action when ...

Neuroscience created 6 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

If you can remember it, you can remember it wrong

(Medical Xpress)—Native peoples in regions where cameras are uncommon sometimes react with caution when their picture is taken. The fear that something must have been stolen from them to create the photo ...

Neuroscience created 8 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (4) | comments 0 | with audio podcast report

Study shows where scene context happens in our brain

In a remote fishing community in Venezuela, a lone fisherman sits on a cliff overlooking the southern Caribbean Sea. This man –– the lookout –– is responsible for directing his comrades on the water, ...

Neuroscience created 10 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (1) | comments 0 | with audio podcast


New sleeping pill poised to hit US markets

An experimental sleeping pill from US drug company Merck is effective at helping people fall and stay asleep, according to reviewers at the US Food and Drug Administration, which could soon approve the new drug.

Antidepressant reduces stress-induced heart condition

A drug commonly used to treat depression and anxiety may improve a stress-related heart condition in people with stable coronary heart disease, according to researchers at Duke Medicine.

Small cancer risk following CT scans in childhood and adolescence confirmed

The gap between life expectancy in patients with a mental illness and the general population has widened since 1985 and efforts to reduce this gap should focus on improving physical health, suggest researchers in a paper ...

Life expectancy gap widens between those with mental illness and general population

The gap between life expectancy in patients with a mental illness and the general population has widened since 1985 and efforts to reduce this gap should focus on improving physical health, suggest researchers in a paper ...

Dietary advice on added sugar is damaging our health, warns heart expert

Dietary advice on added sugar is damaging our health, warns a cardiologist in BMJ today. Dr. Aseem Malhotra believes that "not only has this advice been manipulated by the food industry for profit but it is actually a risk ...

Failure to use linked health records may lead to biased disease estimates

Failure to use linked electronic health records may lead to biased estimates of heart attack incidence and outcome, warn researchers in a paper published in BMJ today.