Babies show sense of fairness, altruism as early as 15 months

October 7, 2011 in Psychology & Psychiatry

A new study presents the first evidence that a basic sense of fairness and altruism appears in infancy. Babies as young as 15 months perceived the difference between equal and unequal distribution of food, and their awareness of equal rations was linked to their willingness to share a toy.

"Our findings show that these norms of and are more rapidly acquired than we thought," said Jessica Sommerville, a University of Washington associate professor of psychology who led the study.

"These results also show a connection between fairness and altruism in infants, such that babies who were more sensitive to the fair distribution of food were also more likely to share their preferred toy," she said.

The study has implications for nurturing human egalitarianism and cooperation. The journal published the findings online Oct. 7, 2011. Co-author is Marco Schmidt, a doctoral student at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

Previous studies reveal that 2-year-old children can help others – considered a measure of altruism – and that around age 6 or 7 they display a sense of fairness. Sommerville, an expert in early childhood development, suspected that these qualities could be apparent at even younger ages.

Babies around 15 months old begin to show cooperative behaviors, such as spontaneously helping others. "We suspected that fairness and altruism might also be apparent then, which could indicate the earliest emergence of fairness," Sommerville said.

During the experiment, a 15-month old baby sat on his or her parent's lap and watched two short videos of experimenters acting out a sharing task. In one video an experimenter holding a bowl of crackers distributed the food between two other experimenters. They did the food allocation twice, once with an equal allotment of crackers and the other with one recipient getting more crackers.

The second movie had the same plot, but the experimenters used a pitcher of milk instead of crackers.

Then the experimenters measured as the babies – 47 in all who were tested individually – looked at the food distributions. According to a phenomenon called "violation of expectancy," babies pay more attention when they are surprised. Similarly, the researchers found that babies spent more time looking if one recipient got more food than the other.

"The infants expected an equal and fair distribution of food, and they were surprised to see one person given more crackers or milk than the other," Sommerville said.

To see if the babies' sense of fairness related to their own to share, the researchers did a second task in which a baby could choose between two toys: a simple LEGO block or a more elaborate LEGO doll. Whichever toy the babies chose, the researchers labeled as the infant's preferred toy.

Then an experimenter who the babies had not seen before gestured toward the toys and asked, "Can I have one?" In response, one third of the infants shared their preferred toy and another third shared their non-preferred toy. The other third of infants did not share either toy, which might be because they were nervous around a stranger or were unmotivated to share.

"The results of the sharing experiment show that early in life there are individual differences in altruism," Sommerville said.

Comparing the toy-sharing task and the food-distribution task results, the researchers found that 92 percent of the babies who shared their preferred toy – called "altruistic sharers" – spent more time looking at the unequal distributions of food. In contrast, 86 percent of the who shared their less-preferred toy, the "selfish sharers," were more surprised, and paid more attention, when there was a fair division of food.

"The altruistic sharers were really sensitive to the violation of fairness in the food task," Sommerville said. Meanwhile, the selfish sharers showed an almost opposite effect, she said.

Does this mean that fairness and altruism are due to nature, or can these qualities be nurtured? Sommerville's research team is investigating this question now, looking at how parents' values and beliefs alter an infant's development.

"It's likely that infants pick up on these norms in a nonverbal way, by observing how people treat each other," Sommerville said.

Provided by University of Washington search and more info website

3.8 /5 (11 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

hush1
Oct 07, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The researchers know the Achilles heel of their research:

1.)"...see... if sense of fairness related to their own willingness to share..."
vs.
2.)"...other third of infants did not share either toy, which might be because they were nervous around a stranger or were unmotivated to share"

The unknown is the motivation that manifests a will to share.
'Selective' motivation weakens the researchers' thesis.

After examining parents, the researchers will know that whatever they label "motivation" - in this case the conjectured manifestation for an infants' will - they will discover "motivation" as a result of parental nurturing.

It is critical to future research that this Achilles heel, weak spot or manko be eliminated.

The rest of the research is not so easily contested.

Wonderful wording: Surprise is a measure of expectation.
Vendicar_Decarian
Oct 07, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
"other third of infants did not share either toy." - humph

Worthless Republicans at birth.
Pirouette
Oct 07, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
LOL. . .I think that the researchers are mistaking charity in the babies' behavior with redistribution of wealth from the haves to the have-nots. Altruism is a good quality in humans to share for the good of all IF there is enough for all. But these babies were not FORCED to share their toys or food, therefore the experiment lacks the reality of aggression as in many cases. The fact that the babies shared at all was a voluntary act of kindness because they wanted to. Not because they had copied what they saw on video. Babies will not allow themselves to go hungry to save another from starvation. They will practice rule #1 which is survival of the fittest. Personality traits are formed at an early age and are not always dependent on what a baby or child has learned, but how they feel at a particular moment. Perhaps the researchers were hoping to find a streak of Socialism starting in babies of that age or older. And if they don't find it, they will place the blame on the parents.
hush1
Oct 08, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
You have pointed out many aspects, all of which fell short because none of the aspects you pointed out became a focus of closer scrutiny. To your defense commentary forums discourage sharp focus.
You assumed much and the assumptions never got a closer look.
Research bias and researchers' bias is the closest meme coming to mind when reading your comment.
Sinister1811
Oct 10, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
If babies have a sense of fairness, then why is it that they fight over toys, and throw tantrums when they don't get their own way? I'm curious as to how they arrived at this conclusion.
hush1
Oct 10, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The answer obviously lies with what you felt and thought at the time. The tools to take you back and help you remember what you felt and thought with your first conflict fail.

The researchers' only conclusion is:
Infants show autism as early as 15 months.
The rest is lip service.

"Sense of fairness" is a place holder for:
"Associations in the brain for behavior labeled 'fairness'. We label those unknown associations as 'sense of fairness'".

Now it is possible to correctly word your question:

If babies have fairness, then what inhibits fairness? (sharing)

The conjecture is: The parents presence offers external stimulus for babies to form associations associated with both fairness and the opposite of fairness.

The researchers were led astray. The toy can be literally anything. As soon as the baby becomes aware of YOUR INTEREST
(in anything)the baby will associate YOUR INTEREST with meaning.

Your curiosity and question arises from a conclusion the researchers never stated
Rank 3.8 /5 (11 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • A question about drug tolerance
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Poor nutrition leading to overeating?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Math and dyslexia?
    createdMay 21, 2012
  • portable metabolism meter?
    createdMay 21, 2012
  • Rare medical conditions on 20/20 tonight
    createdMay 18, 2012
  • "Good" Cholesterol in Doubt
    createdMay 17, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences

More news stories

More mental health care urged for kids who self-harm

(HealthDay) -- Doctors have long known that some kids suffering severe emotional turmoil find relief in physical pain -- cutting or burning or sticking themselves with pins to achieve a form of release.

Psychology & Psychiatry created 19 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Questionable research practices surprisingly common

(Medical Xpress) -- Not all scientific misconduct is flat-out fraud. Much falls into the murkier realm of “questionable research practices.” A new study finds that in one field, psychology, these practices are surprisingly ...

Psychology & Psychiatry created 23 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Feeling strong emotions makes peoples' brains 'tick together'

Experiencing strong emotions synchronises brain activity across individuals, research team at Aalto University and Turku PET Centre in Finland has revealed.

Psychology & Psychiatry created May 24, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Formal recognition of PMDD will lift stigma for women

A decision to recognise premenstrual dysphoric disorder as a genuine psychiatric condition will finally provide “validation for this awful and poorly understood” syndrome and alleviate the stigma ...

Psychology & Psychiatry created May 24, 2012 | popularity 2 / 5 (1) | comments 1

Long-term meditation leads to different brain organization

(Medical Xpress) -- People who practice mindfulness meditation learn to accept their feelings, emotions, and states of mind without judging or resisting them. They simply live in the moment.

Psychology & Psychiatry created May 24, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 0 | with audio podcast


Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse

(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...

Cancer may require simpler genetic mutations than previously thought

Chromosomal deletions in DNA often involve just one of two gene copies inherited from either parent. But scientists haven't known how a deletion in one gene from one parent, called a "hemizygous" deletion, can contribute ...

Inherited DNA change explains overactive leukemia gene

A small inherited change in DNA is largely responsible for overactivating a gene linked to poor treatment response in people with acute leukemia.

Tongue analysis software uses ancient Chinese medicine to warn of disease

For 5,000 years, the Chinese have used a system of medicine based on the flow and balance of positive and negative energies in the body. In this system, the appearance of the tongue is one of the measures used to classify ...

Skp2 activates cancer-promoting, glucose-processing Akt

HER2 and its epidermal growth factor receptor cousins mobilize a specialized protein to activate a major player in cancer development and sugar metabolism, scientists report in the May 25 issue of Cell.

Early physical therapist treatment associated with reduced risk of healthcare utilization and reduced overall healthcare

A new study published in Spine shows that early treatment by a physical therapist for low back pain (LBP), as compared to delayed treatment, was associated with reduced risk of subsequent healthcare utilization and lower ...