Earlier male circumcision may help to slow rates of HIV, HPV transmission in South Africa

According to Anna R. Giuliano, Ph.D., program leader in cancer epidemiology at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla., and colleagues in the Netherlands, earlier circumcision of males in South Africa may be a positive step in slowing the spread of both HIV and the human papillomavirus (HPV). Their commentary and data were published in a recent issue of the British medical journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases (Vol. 11) 581-582.

"Countries with high incidences of HIV also have high incidences of cancer-related HPV," said Giuliano. "This is especially true in South Africa."

Commenting on a study related to circumcision and HIV and HPV transmission, Giuliano and her colleagues note that studies have shown that circumcision of HIV-infected men does not reduce HPV transmission to their female partners. Many factors may account for this lack of efficacy. However, Giuliano and colleagues suggest that the high prevalence of HPV among the HIV-infected men (73 percent in the intervention group and 69 percent in the control group) and the high prevalence of HIV among the female partners of greater than 60 percent, relates to the lack of efficacy of male circumcision. In that study, it was pointed out that the high and sustained prevalence of HPV among the HIV-infected individuals is "likely to overwhelm any preventative effect of circumcision."

" is important for reduction of not only HIV infection but also HPV infection in HIV-negative men and their female partners," said Giuliano. "However, its efficacy seems limited to HIV-negative men. These results suggest the need for early circumcision to achieve maximum effectiveness in populations with a high incidence of HIV and cervical cancer."

For maximum reductions in HIV and HPV infections and related diseases in women, such as cervical cancer, the researchers recommend that both circumcision and HPV vaccination of the male population should be delivered prior to sexual debut.

Provided by H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute

1 /5 (2 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

New study reveals why some people may be immune to HIV-1

Nov 20, 2014

Doctors have long been mystified as to why HIV-1 rapidly sickens some individuals, while in others the virus has difficulties gaining a foothold. Now, a study of genetic variation in HIV-1 and in the cells ...

Virus discovery could impact HIV drug research

Nov 20, 2014

A research team led by Portland State University (PSU) biology professor Ken Stedman has unlocked the structure of an unusual virus that lives in volcanic hot springs. The discovery could pave the way for better drugs to ...

UN warns over threat of AIDS rebound

Nov 19, 2014

South African actress Charlize Theron threw her weight Tuesday behind an urgent new UN campaign to end AIDS as a global health threat by 2030.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

CraigGarrett
4 / 5 (4) Oct 06, 2011
Circumcision to prevent STDs does not make sense. Circumcised men still have to use a condom, just like intact (uncircumcised) men. The best way to prevent STDs is through education about safe sex, not surgery. Don't let them fool you into getting circumcised - you'll still have to wear a condom every time.
CHollman82
4 / 5 (4) Oct 06, 2011
What a crock of shit, ear infections too should I cut my ears off? Athletes foot? Just cut your toes off!

Religious nonsense, fear-mongering.
Hugh7
not rated yet Oct 12, 2011
The key words are "circumcision of HIV-infected men does not reduce HPV transmission to their female partners." The rest of her claims are an attempt to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. Circumcision of any babies or men makes very little difference to disease transmission in either direction. Anna Giuliano has previously claimed that circumcised men get less HPV than intact men, but she used men from Mexico and Brazil (almost all intact) and the USA (mostly circumcised). There are plenty of differences between those countries that explain the difference better. Previously Wawer et al. started to show that circumcising HIV men INcreases their risk of transmitting HIV to women, but (so?) they cut that study short before that could be confirmed.

Circumcision is a "cure" looking for a disease, an excision looking for an excuse.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.