Research sheds light on origins of greatness

Michigan State University's Zach Hambrick refutes popular theory that intelligence only goes so far in determining excellence. Credit: Image courtesy of Michigan State University

What makes people great? Popular theorists such as the New Yorker's Malcolm Gladwell and the New York Times' David Brooks argue that intelligence plays a role -- but only up to a point. Beyond that, they say, it's practice, practice, practice.

Zach Hambrick agrees with the practice argument -- imagine where would be if he hadn't honed his , after all -- but the Michigan State University scientist takes exception to the view that intelligence plays no role in determining excellence.

In a provocative new paper, Hambrick suggests working memory capacity – which is closely related to general intelligence – may sometimes be the deciding factor between good and great.

In a series of studies, Hambrick and colleagues found that people with higher levels of working outperformed those with lower levels -- and even in individuals with extensive experience and knowledge of the task at hand. The studies analyzed complex tasks such as piano sight reading.

"While the specialized knowledge that accumulates through practice is the most important ingredient to reach a very high level of skill, it's not always sufficient," said Hambrick, associate professor of psychology. " capacity can still predict performance in complex domains such as music, chess, science, and maybe even in sports that have a substantial mental component such as golf."

In the paper, which appears in the research journal Current Directions in Psychological Science, Hambrick notes that both Gladwell and Brooks wrote bestselling books that make the argument that intelligence only goes so far.

"A person with a 150 IQ is in theory much smarter than a person with a 120 IQ, but those additional 30 points produce little measurable benefit when it comes to lifetime success," Brooks writes in "The Social Animal."

Hambrick's response: "David Brooks and Malcolm Gladwell are simply wrong. The evidence is quite clear: A high level of intellectual ability puts a person at a measurable advantage -- and the higher the better."

Research has shown that intelligence has both genetic and environmental origins, Hambrick said, yet "for a very long time we have tried and failed to come up with ways to boost people's intelligence."

Hambrick and his fellow researchers continue to study the issue. "The jury's still out on whether you can improve your general ," he said. "We hold out hope that cognitive training of some sort may produce these benefits. But we have yet to find the magic bullet."

Related Stories

People learn while they sleep, study suggests

Sep 27, 2011

People may be learning while they're sleeping – an unconscious form of memory that is still not well understood, according to a study by Michigan State University researchers.

Clarity in short-term memory shows no link with IQ

Nov 29, 2010

One person correctly remembers four of eight items just seen but is fuzzy on details. Another person recalls only two of the items but with amazingly precise clarity. So what ability translates to higher IQ?

Recommended for you

Elderly brains learn, but maybe too much

7 hours ago

A new study led by Brown University reports that older learners retained the mental flexibility needed to learn a visual perception task but were not as good as younger people at filtering out irrelevant ...

Inpatient psychotherapy is effective in Germany

9 hours ago

Sarah Liebherz (Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf) and Sven Rabung (Institute of Psychology, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt) have examined 59 studies conducted between 1977 ...

A game changer to boost literacy and maths skills

11 hours ago

(Medical Xpress)—Finding the best way to teach reading has been an ongoing challenge for decades, especially for those children in underprivileged areas who fail to learn to read. What is the magic ingredient that will ...

How do we make moral judgements?

12 hours ago

In a target article published in the current issue of the American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB) Neuroscience, Université de Montréal and IRCM neuroethics experts open the black box of moral intuitions by suggesting a new ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Isaacsname
5 / 5 (1) Oct 05, 2011
"The jury's still out on whether you can improve your general intelligence," he said. "We hold out hope that cognitive training of some sort may produce these benefits. But we have yet to find the magic bullet."

It's called " wllingness "
JRDarby
not rated yet Oct 05, 2011
It's called " wllingness "


Agreed. If there's one thing I have found to hold true in life, it's that most (all?) people are actually capable of so very, VERY much more than they think. All that stands in the way of nearly anyone is the erroneous belief that "I can't" and the consequent lack of fierce and unyielding determination to persevere until the desired result is obtained.
Isaacsname
5 / 5 (1) Oct 05, 2011
Ahh yes, willingness.

I sadly did not have enough to spell-check my 3 word post O:

But I know what you mean. It takes bull-headed determination to prevent you from standing in your own way, ..silly. I honestly think most people have a deep fear of being successful, for a variety of reasons. Maybe they shun the idea of people looking up to them ? Idk..humans are strange.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.