Study confirms males and females have at least one thing in common: Upregulating X

In a study published today in the journal Nature Genetics, a group of scientists including UNC biologist Jason Lieb, PhD, present experiments supporting a longstanding hypothesis that explains how males can survive with only one copy of the X chromosome. The finding provides clarity to a hotly debated topic in science and provides biologists with more information to interpret experiments involving genetic measurements in males and females.

"The issue is important because many diseases are tied to a defect in a within the cell," said Lieb, who is also a member of UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Women have two X chromosomes, while men have one X and one Y. The lack of a 'back up' copy of the X chromosome in males contributes to many disorders that have long been observed to occur more often in males, such as , Duchene muscular dystrophy, and certain types of color blindness. Having only one copy of X and two copies of every other chromosome also creates a more fundamental problem – with any other chromosome, the gene number imbalance resulting from having only one copy would be lethal. How can males survive with only one X?

have been debating how organisms and cells manage the imbalance between X and other chromosomes for years, with the dominant theory being that both sexes up-regulate the expression of X-linked genes, essentially doubling their expression to "2X" in males and "4X" in females. Then, to correct the imbalance that now appears in females (since they have the equivalent of "4" Xs now and 2 of every other chromosome), females then 'turn off' one of the hyperactive X chromosomes, resulting in a balanced "2X" expression of those genes across both sexes.

The advent of new technology based on RNA sequencing and proteomic analysis has given scientists more accurate ways to measure gene expression, and some results published in the last few years have not supported the idea that X chromosomes up-regulate.

Lieb and his colleagues re-analyzed data used in previous analyses, along with new data from humans, mice, roundworms, and fruit flies and found more evidence that the up-regulation is correct – but with some interesting twists across species. In mammals – humans and mice – both up-regulate X chromosome gene expression and females then equalize expression by turning off the one X chromosome. In roundworms (C. elegans) the both female X stay active, but the genes on both Xs are down-regulated by half to compensate in the females. In fruit files (Drosophilia melanogaster), increase the expression of genes, with no upregulation of X in females.

"There are several ways to get the same result and we are seeing how the dosage-balancing mechanism works in different species," says Lieb. "We also found that not all X-linked genes are dosage compensated to the same degree– adding another layer of complexity for scientists who study gene regulation."

Related Stories

X chromosome exposed

May 29, 2008

Researchers from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) in Heidelberg, Germany, and the EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) in Hinxton, UK, have revealed new insights into how sex chromosomes are regulated. ...

New thinking on regulation of sex chromosomes in fruit flies

Sep 19, 2011

Fruit flies have been indispensible to our understanding of genetics and biological processes in all animals, including humans. Yet, despite being one of the most studied of animals, scientists are still finding the fruit ...

Scientists show how men amp up their X chromosome

Mar 02, 2011

What makes a man? His clothes? His car? His choice of scotch? The real answer, says Brown University biologist Erica Larschan, is the newly understood activity of a protein complex that, like a genetic power tool, gives enzymes ...

Recommended for you

Right environment could improve stem cell therapies

Oct 23, 2014

Stem cell therapies are being hailed as a potential cure for many major health conditions, but there is much still to learn about the highly complex environments needed to optimise these therapies, according to researchers ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

210
not rated yet Oct 24, 2011
They "up-regulate" indeed.
Now, if we could see when and how the up-regulation is done, we could catch genetically-based disease in the ACT!
Further, with all the advances being made in stem cells, biotech, nanotech, and genetics and pharmacology, increasingly one can see the need for a unified repository of this data. We need a way to keep the left hand knowing what the right hand has done. Somewhere, all new knowledge can be 'pieced' together so we don't miss the chance to solve or cure something because we did not 'put-it-all-together'.
I just get the feeling we are closing in on something MAJOR and I don't want us to miss it.
I think we need a science-only, make-it-real, DARPA, or data repository.
word-to-ya-muthas