Denying mental qualities to animals in order to eat them
November 25, 2011 in Psychology & Psychiatry
(Medical Xpress) -- New research by Dr Brock Bastian from UQ's School of Psychology highlights the psychological processes that people engage in to reduce their discomfort over eating meat.
This paper will be published in an upcoming edition of the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, where Dr Bastian and his co-authors show that people deny mental qualities to animals they eat.
"Many people like eating meat, but most are reluctant to harm things that have minds. Our studies show that this motivates people to deny minds to animals," Dr Bastian said.
The research demonstrates when people are confronted with the harm that their meat-eating brings to food animals they view those animals as possessing fewer mental capacities compared to when they are not reminded.
The findings also reveal that this denial of mind to food animals is especially evident when people expect to eat meat in the near future.
Dr Bastian said it shows that denying mind to animals that are used for food makes it less troublesome for people to eat them.
"Meat is central to most people's diets and a focus of culinary enjoyment, yet most people also like animals and are disturbed by harm done to them; therefore creating a 'meat paradox' - people's concern for animal welfare conflicts with their culinary behavior.
"For this reason, people rarely enjoy thinking about where meat comes from, the processes it goes through to get to their tables, or the living qualities of the animals from which it is extracted," he said.
Dr Bastian's research argues that meat eaters go to great lengths to overcome these inconsistencies between their beliefs and behaviours.
"In our current research we focus on the processes by which people facilitate their practice of eating meat. People often mentally separate meat from animals so they can eat pork or beef without thinking about pigs or cows.
"Denying minds to animals reduces concern for their welfare, justifying the harm caused to them in the process of meat production," he added.
Meat is pleasing to the palate for many, and although the vegetarian lifestyle is increasingly popular, most people continue to make meat a central component of their diet.
"In short, our work highlights the fact that although most people do not mind eating meat, they do not like thinking of animals they eat as having possessed minds," Dr Bastian said.
Provided by
University of Queensland
-
Survey: Meat eaters want no hormones
May 11, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Facebook co-founder killing his own food: Fortune
May 27, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
PETA offers $1 million for fake meat
Apr 22, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Dog meat could come off Chinese menus
Jan 26, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Incidences and severity of prostate cancer correlated with meat consumption: study
Nov 23, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Motion perception revisited: High Phi effect challenges established motion perception assumptions
Apr 23, 2013 |
3 / 5 (2) |
2
-
Anything you can do I can do better: Neuromolecular foundations of the superiority illusion (Update)
Apr 02, 2013 |
4.5 / 5 (11) |
5
-
The visual system as economist: Neural resource allocation in visual adaptation
Mar 30, 2013 |
5 / 5 (2) |
9
-
Separate lives: Neuronal and organismal lifespans decoupled
Mar 27, 2013 |
4.9 / 5 (8) |
0
-
Sizing things up: The evolutionary neurobiology of scale invariance
Feb 28, 2013 |
4.8 / 5 (10) |
14
-
How can there be villous adenoma in colon, if there are no villi there
8 hours ago
-
How can there be a term called "intestinal metaplasia" of stomach
May 21, 2013
-
Pressure-volume curve: Elastic Recoil Pressure don't make sense
May 18, 2013
-
If you became brain-dead, would you want them to pull the plug?
May 17, 2013
-
MRI bill question
May 15, 2013
-
Ratio of Hydrogen of Oxygen in Dessicated Animal Protein
May 13, 2013
- More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences
More news stories
Good marriage can buffer effects of dad's depression on young children
What effect does a father's depression have on his young son or daughter? When fathers report a high level of emotional intimacy in their marriage, their children benefit, said a University of Illinois study.
Psychology & Psychiatry
5 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
American, Nepalese kids a world apart on social duties
(Medical Xpress)—Preschoolers universally recognize that one's choices are not always free – that our decisions may be constrained by social obligations to be nice to others or follow rules set by parents ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
7 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Ethicists' behavior not more moral, study finds
(Medical Xpress)—Do ethicists engage in better moral behavior than other professors? The answer is no. Nor are they more likely than nonethicists to act according to values they espouse, according to researchers from the ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
7 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Study says empathy plays a key role in moral judgments
Is it permissible to harm one to save many? Those who tend to say "yes" when faced with this classic dilemma are likely to be deficient in a specific kind of empathy, according to a report published in the scientific journal ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
10 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Weather worries can threaten a child's mental health
(HealthDay)—The monstrous tornado that devastated Moore, Okla., on Monday, killing dozens of adults and children, is a stunning example of violent weather that can affect a child's mental well-being.
Psychology & Psychiatry
23 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Novel approach for influenza vaccination shows promise in early animal testing
A new approach for immunizing against influenza elicited a more potent immune response and broader protection than the currently licensed seasonal influenza vaccines when tested in mice and ferrets. The vaccine ...
Hospitals profit when patients develop bloodstream infections
Johns Hopkins researchers report that hospitals may be reaping enormous income for patients whose hospital stays are complicated by preventable bloodstream infections contracted in their intensive care units.
Alleviating hunger in the US, it's a SNAP, researcher says
A University of Illinois researcher says that the cornerstone of our efforts to alleviate food insecurity should be to encourage more people to participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) "because ...
Survey points out deficiencies in addictions training for medical residents
A 2012 survey of internal medicine residents at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) – one of the nation's leading teaching hospitals – found that more than half rated the training they had received in addiction and other ...
Obstructive sleep apnea associated with less visceral fat accumulation in women than men
A new study from researchers in Japan indicates that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is independently associated with visceral (abdominal) fat accumulation only in men, perhaps explaining gender differences in the impact of ...
Enzyme-activating antibodies revealed as marker for most severe form of rheumatoid arthritis
In a series of lab experiments designed to unravel the workings of a key enzyme widely considered a possible trigger of rheumatoid arthritis, researchers at Johns Hopkins have found that in the most severe ...
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (4)
So you don't eat microbes?
Vegetarians are just people who don't eat animals visible to the naked eye. A rather arbitrary distinction. (ome don't even make that distinction by including fish in their diet but not meat)
We are products of evolution (omnivores). Claiming that a balanced/healthy eating habit is a matter of choice or culture is the act of someone who completely disregards physiology.
Yes, I'd rather have lab-grown meat sooner than later instead of the farming of animals. But until then we shouldn't try to apply morality and ethics over and above the applicable scope to thes areas.
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
It amaze me how people can decide not to eat meat, and not only that, they take on not feeding meat to growing children. And when they encounter bigger children raised with protein, they get mad!!!! they want the whole human race to get short and unhealthy. Vegetarianism is destructive to humans.
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Everything eats everything else, from birth to death, it's just how it is, like the Oroboros.
There's absolutely no shame in eating, nor shame in being eaten :)
I composted several deer in Pa and used the compost on organic crops, that really threw the veg-heads on the farm for a loop...
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The article has nothing to do with eating predators. It only talks about meat (at one point it talks about cows and pigs). I don't know where you get that angle from.
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
You're just fabricating reality. Most of animals are strictly specialized to their food. We aren't typical meat eaters, as our ability to digest meat isn't very high by our very nature.
http://www.news.c...89982696
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
http://www.youtub...dmRGFVNM
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Children, you say 'OMNIVORE". Sound it out...om-nee.vor...!
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
That's why eating raw vegetables is pretty pointless for humans. Yes, they contain lots of vitamins - moreso than their processed/cooked variations - but our digestive system is totally unable to get at them.
Always remember:
Usable content of a thing is: Amount you put in MINUS amount which comes out unused (be it calories, vitamins, ... ).
Looking at the length of our intestinal tract we're much closer to predators:
(Predator have a 4:1 to 6:1 ratio of body length to length of intestinal tract - with humans having a 5:1 ratio. Herbivores are more in the 12:1 (horse) to 20:1 (cow) range). Similar differences exist taken the total surface areas as a ratio.)
Also there's a number of unsaturated hydrocarbons we need for the brain which can only be gotten via animal products.
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
I do have a problem with factory farming where the animals live miserable lives waiting to be slaughtered. That's why I get much of my meat from local butchers who offer products from small local farms that treat their animals with respect and raise them free of un-necessary antibiotics. It costs more, but it is worth it to me.
These animals would not have gotten the chance to experience life if they had not been raised by humans for food. The end of their lives comes quickly with little time for suffering in contrast to those species that live in the wild (or even most of us humans).
These people need to stop taking Disney so seriously, the Lion King was not a vegan!
Nov 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
I usually agree with your insightful posts, but I have to disagree on this. There are scores of studies that showed the benefits of consuming fresh vegetables. According to you, eating fresh salads is a waste of time and money - millions around the world will beg to differ. Without going into details, consuming processed food and plenty of read meat (as per popular western diets) has been shown times and again as the fastest way to get colon cancer, hypertension, diabetes, and a whole lot more.
Nov 26, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
There is a reason why we put vinegar on salads (or cook vegetables). It is a form of 'pre digestion' (just like spider dissolve their prey outside their bodies before sucking up the remainging goo). Vinegar (or heat) break down the sturdy cell walls in vegetables and allow us to get at the nutrients. Vitamins A,D,E and K are also only soluble in oily substances (this is why we use oil in salads or cooking fats like oil or butter). Without that we can't really get at them.
Cooking and using chemicals like vinegar to help in digestion is all right.
But chowing down on a raw carrot is pretty pointless if you think you're going to get any vitamins that way.
As an aside: Most salads are pretty devoid of vitamins to begin with. They are big leaves. No point for a plant to put valuable resources in there.
Nov 26, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Nov 26, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
From a purely practical point of view huamn flesh would be optimal. After all: what do we try to do with the stuff we eat? We build human flesh out of it.
Human flesh should contain the most perfect mix of stuff we need to build our own.
B12 and iron are really some things which you cannot get in sufficient quantities even through the most well balanced vegetarian diet (much less a vegan diet). The reason why people don't notice is because adults have a large reservoir of these - which can last for years until depleted. This is why it's criminal negligence to raise kids on a vegetarian diet (they don't have these reservoirs yet)
Certainly we can reduce our meat intake drastically from what is the norm - but eliminating meat is going too far.
Nov 26, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Nov 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Nov 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Yes, and if we process it into small green wafers and say it's made from plankton, maybe even the vegetarians would eat it!
Hmmm, what should we call it...
Nov 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
If all food stuff were to be synthesized, then rationalizations to eat life become meaningless.
Imagine an effort to rationalize all synthetic food stuff.
An effort as great as the rationalizations for all plastics.
Nov 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
You missed the point, like Ray Charles target shooting.
Find one organism, on earth, who's body is not constantly consumed and rebuilt throughtout it's " life ". Then maybe explain why you seem to think that a collection of lives ( a body ) is a singular life belonging soley to you.
It's not, that's an illusory quality based on egotistical thinking.
You think you aren't being eaten right this very minute ?
I would disagree.
Nov 27, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
So - I've actually no problem with the consummation of animals in such a pleasant unobtrusive way. Why I should have, after all?
Nov 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I think not.
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Ummmm....really? Where's the big body of evidence supporting this ludicrous claim?
Let me guess. It comes from the Ronald McDonald research institute for meat-eating society-builders.
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
What kind of psycho-babble, higher-order-of-life philosophical nonsense are you spouting here?
First, I don't think there's any reasonable chance we'll be inhabiting the "rest of the universe" anytime soon. Hell, we're lucky if we can get a probe to land on Mars without a malfunction. So, I think we have a few years to work on our philosophical underpinnings.
Second, how the hell would you know what the "proper frame of mind" is for exploring the universe?
Are you claiming to be an alien lifeform, come here to teach us about how to eat properly?
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
It's not exactly destructive but it's not constructive, either.
The metastudy from 1999 concluded that the only difference is in ischaemic heart disease where vegetarians came out better than meat eaters. Bizzarely fish eaters have an even lower risk.
Even though the heart disease value is significant the study was only adjusted for age, sex, and smoker status while acknowledging that excercise level was higher in the vegetarian group. And I think that there area number of studies out there that show that excercise has a positive influence on the risk for heart disease.
Basically it boils down to: vegetarians don't live longer or healthier - they just die of different causes.
If you want to go vegetarian for perceived philosophical, ethical or environmental reasons (less resources per Btu of food produced) - fine.
But for health reasons? That's just kidding yourself.
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Even as a meat-loving carnivore (OK, I eat a few veggies), I'm well aware that there is a very large body of research over decades supporting a low or no-meat diet as a means of extending life and living what life you have with greater health.
Wait, is your last name Atkins by any chance?
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
http://www.ajcn.o...16S.full
The lifestyle has no significant impact on the cause or prevalence of death (except heart disease - and as noted: fish eaters were even better off than vegtarians in that regard).
People who had turned to vegetarian living for less than 5 years before entering the study even had an increase in cause of death by lung cancer.
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Random thoughts:
1) Are you just pretending to be unaware of the many, many, studies that have been published in some of the world's most-renowned peer-reviewed journals over the last 50 years that claim just the opposite?
2) The AJCN isn't exactly JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association). It's been criticized for lack of standards (below), but the 1999 study was widely reported. The study was also roundly criticized.
http://www.weight...ons.html
3) A good summary of multiple studies. http://www.facebo...80077549
4) Another good summary. http://veganhealt.../dxrates
Anyway, I'm getting ready to have chicken stir-fry for lunch, so what do I care...
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Do you propose setting up "natural death" farms so that humans can have enough to eat from organisms that have lived without interference?
And what do you propose to do about natural predators, who make a practice of killing and eating prey that therefore has not had the chance to live a "full, natural life"?