US Supreme Court sets hearings on Obama health reform

The US Supreme Court will hear evidence challenging President Barack Obama's health care reform -- which has come under fire from Republicans -- over three days in March, a spokeswoman said Monday.

A ruling against the landmark legislation, The Act, would be a major blow for Obama and his Democratic Party as he battles to win a second term in November 2012 elections.

A spokeswoman for the Supreme Court said oral evidence would be taken on March 26, 27 and 28 from challengers of the reform.

Opponents say the most controversial feature of the law, a mandate that says individuals must buy health insurance or face a tax penalty, violates rights enshrined under the US Constitution.

A challenge on the individual mandate, from the state of Florida, will be heard on March 27 and two hours have been set aside that day, according to schedules published on the Supreme Court website.

A second challenge to the law by 26 US states and small businesses that want to completely strike down Obama's reforms, will be given one hour on March 28.

The legislation, a key plank of Obama's 2008 White House campaign which passed into law amid much fanfare in 2010, was later taken up by the nation's top bench of nine judges.

Republican opponents argue that the government has no power to compel people to buy health insurance.

On November 8, a US appeals court upheld the constitutionality of Obama's health care overhaul, ruling that mandating people to buy health insurance or face a tax was not a violation of individual rights.

In August, a in Georgia ruled that the individual mandate exceeded the powers of Congress, but also said that the remainder of the was within the bounds of the constitution.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US Supreme Court to hear challenge to Obama health care

Nov 14, 2011

The US Supreme Court Monday agreed to take up the case of President Barack Obama's landmark health care reform, which has come under fire from rival Republicans, in a move which could weigh on next year's elections.

US appeals panel upholds Obama health care law

Nov 08, 2011

A US appeals court panel Tuesday upheld the constitutionality of President Barack Obama's landmark health care overhaul, in the latest legal challenge to the law which is expected to end up at the Supreme Court.

Obama asks Supreme Court to rule on health care

Sep 28, 2011

President Barack Obama's administration Wednesday asked the US Supreme Court to uphold his historic health care law, likely sparking an explosive legal showdown in the heat of the 2012 election.

Recommended for you

AMA examines economic impact of physicians

15 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Physicians who mainly engage in patient care contribute a total of $1.6 trillion in economic output, according to the American Medical Association (AMA)'s Economic Impact Study.

Less-schooled whites lose longevity, study finds

15 hours ago

Barbara Gentry slowly shifts her heavy frame out of a chair and uses a walker to move the dozen feet to a chair not far from the pool table at the Buford Senior Center. Her hair is white and a cough sometimes interrupts her ...

How to keep your fitness goals on track

15 hours ago

(HealthDay)—The New Year's resolutions many made to get fit have stalled by now. And one expert thinks that's because many people set their goals too high.

Suddenly health insurance is not for sale

Apr 18, 2014

(HealthDay)— Darlene Tucker, an independent insurance broker in Scotts Hill, Tenn., says health insurers in her area aren't selling policies year-round anymore.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nerdyguy
1 / 5 (3) Dec 20, 2011
Good, maybe we can finally have a chance to dump this bloated hippo of a law and try again.
Dichotomy
1 / 5 (2) Dec 20, 2011
I somewhat agree. There is a fair amount of dirty water in with the baby, but I agree with certain provisions with the legislation such as providers not being able to drop you once you start using their services. Insurance is supposed to be in lieu of unexpected substantial life expenses, not in addition to...