Tough choice looms on 9/11 health lawsuits

By DAVID B. CARUSO , Associated Press
In this Oct. 11, 2001 file photo, firefighters make their way over the ruins of the World Trade Center through clouds of dust and smoke at ground zero in New York. More than 1,600 people suing over their exposure to World Trade Center dust must decide by Jan. 2 whether to keep fighting in court, or drop their lawsuits and apply for benefits from a government fund. (AP Photo/Stan Honda, Pool, File)

(AP) -- More than 1,600 people who filed lawsuits claiming that their health was ruined by dust and smoke from the collapsed World Trade Center must decide by Jan. 2 whether to keep fighting in court, or drop the litigation and apply for benefits from a government compensation fund.

For some, the choice is fraught with risk.

set aside $2.76 billion last winter for people who developed illnesses after spending time in the ash-choked .

But to be considered for a share of the aid, all potential applicants must dismiss any pending lawsuits by the deadline and give up their right to sue forever over 9/11 . Anyone with a lawsuit still pending on Jan. 3 is barred from the program for life.

The is attractive because it spares the sick from having to prove that their is related to 9/11, and that someone other than the terrorists put them in harm's way. But applicants won't know for months, or even years, how much money they might eventually receive from the program. That means some people may give up their lawsuits and find out later that they only qualify for a modest payment.

Others face a deeper problem. People exposed to trade center dust have blamed it for hundreds of illnesses, but currently the fund only covers a limited number of , including asthma, scarred lungs and other problems. That list does not currently include any type of cancer, which scientists have yet to link to trade center toxins.

But the very possibility that cancer could, someday, be covered has led some plaintiffs to drop their lawsuits anyway.

"In a sense, I've weighed my options and rolled the dice believing that the country I helped is not going to let me down," said former New York City police detective John Walcott, who retired after being diagnosed with in 2003.

He decided a few days before Christmas to drop his case, saying he had come to believe he would never get anything out of the legal system.

"The court system was set up for attorneys to make a lot of money," he said. He added that at age 47, he is tired of a court fight that had no end in sight. "I'm done with 9/11. I can't go forward with my life and family and live in peace with this hanging over me."

The special master overseeing the compensation fund, Sheila Birnbaum, acknowledged that the deadline would put some people in a tight spot, especially if they have an illness that isn't currently covered by the fund.

"That is one of the dilemmas," she said.

Birnbaum noted, though, that the law gives her no wiggle room. Anyone who has a lawsuit active on Jan. 3 will be disqualified from consideration, she said, even if their illness is later deemed to be covered.

"It's a hard decision that they have to make," she said.

The lengthy application process for the fund began in October, and Birnbaum said she expected thousands to apply. She could not say how many might do so by the time the fund closes years from now.

Lawyers who represent people with pending cases said they have been going over the pros and cons with their clients for several months, to see which option might suit them better.

"It's a complicated analysis," said attorney Gregory Cannata, whose firm represents about 100 people, including laborers brought in to repair damaged buildings and cleaners who swept tons of dust from office suites.

Cannata said that for the most part, his clients have decided to stick with their lawsuits, in part because of the possibility of a larger payout than they might receive under the government program.

Police officers, firefighters and city contractors who cleared away the 9/11 rubble make up only a small slice of the people facing the dilemma. Most of the more than 5,000 city workers who filed lawsuits claiming that the city had failed to protect them from the dust settled their cases in 2010, before the compensation fund was created.

Walcott was one of a few who rejected the deal, worth more than $700 million. Under the law, people who settled previously will be allowed to apply for government benefits. Any award they receive will be reduced by whatever they got from the legal settlement.

The tough decisions won't end Jan. 2.

In addition to people with legal claims already pending, thousands more New Yorkers have become ill because of exposure to the dust. They will have to decide in the coming years whether to sue someone over their illness or try their luck in the government program.

If too many people apply for aid from the compensation fund - including people with common illnesses that may, or may not, have anything to do with 9/11 toxins - the nearly $2.8 billion set aside by Congress may get exhausted quickly. Adding just 1,000 people with cancer to the program could eat up $1 billion, said Noah Kushlefsky, an attorney with the firm Kreindler & Kreindler.

"The real question is, how many more cases are there out there?" Kushlefsky said.

Enough, it seems, to keep both the courts and the 9/11 fund administrators busy for some time yet.

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

9/11 rescuers agree huge compensation deal

Nov 19, 2010

More than 10,000 rescue workers sickened by toxic dust and debris after the September 11 attacks Friday accepted a huge 625-million-dollar compensation payout, the government insurer said.

US appeals court considers wiretapping lawsuits

Aug 31, 2011

(AP) -- A federal appeals court panel in Seattle will consider Wednesday whether to revive two cases claiming the government has monitored the communications of millions of Americans since 9/11.

Japan facing vaccination lawsuits

Feb 25, 2008

The Japanese government is bracing for a flood of damage suits from hundreds of people who contracted hepatitis B through mandatory childhood vaccinations.

Dusty legacy of 9/11 still a medical mystery

Sep 01, 2011

(AP) -- Like a lot of New Yorkers who spent time near the smoking ruins of the World Trade Center, Lorraine Ashman needs to take a deep breath before listing all the health problems that have afflicted her over the past ...

Recommended for you

The hunt for botanicals

Dec 19, 2014

Herbal medicine can be a double-edged sword and should be more rigorously investigated for both its beneficial and harmful effects, say researchers writing in a special supplement of Science.

Mozambique decriminalises abortion to stem maternal deaths

Dec 19, 2014

Mozambique has passed a law permitting women to terminate unwanted pregnancies under specified conditions, a move hailed by activists in a country where clandestine abortions account for a large number of maternal deaths.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nanobanano
4 / 5 (1) Dec 26, 2011
That's $1.7 Million per person.

You know what? Shit happens.

Nobody showed up and give my family $1.7 million per person when our house burned down.

That's life.

If you want compensation for a terrorist attack, vote for Presidents and Senators who will actually force the terrorists and rogue nations to PAY you compensation, in stead of the Politically Correct panzies we've had in office for 30 years now.

Like I said, Random shit happens to everybody.

If you get a $1.7 million just for being scared shitless one time and getting sick, then why shouldn't I get the same for being traumatized from a house fire?

And yeah, pretty much everyone in the construction and housing industry is exposed to all this shit: concrete dust, asbestos, fiberglass insulation, etc, 40 hours per week (or more). Why not go ahead and give all carpenters, concrete finishers, and electricians a check for $1.7 million too? They deserve it more than these wall street bums anyway.
Vendicar_Decarian
1 / 5 (2) Dec 26, 2011
NanoTard seems to fill his diaper whenever anyone talks about money.

Conservatives are like that.

He conveniently forgets that under orders by the Bush Administration, the official government word was that the air in New York was fresh and safe for all concerned after 911.

It has subsequently been shown that they were lying through their teeth, as Conservatives always do.

Given that these responders were lied to by the Republican Bush Administration, about the air quality that they were forced to endure, they have every right to compensation.

That compensation should come directly from the coffers of the Lying Republican party.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.