An apple a day isn't enough

Adults from 30 to 60 years old, especially those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, aren't consuming the daily recommended levels of fruits and vegetables. Quebecers, however, eat more of nature's produce than their fellow Canadians.

These are some of the findings of a new Concordia University study, published by , which sheds light on who reaches in their fridge crisper often enough to gain the of a comprised of .

"People from the Atlantic to the western provinces consume fruits and less frequently compared to Quebecers," says lead author Mesbah Sharaf, a PhD candidate in Concordia's Department of Economics. "This could be due to cultural influence, since Quebec is a predominantly a French-speaking province with a long history of farming, fruits, vegetables and ."

Co-author Sunday Azagba, who is also a PhD candidate in the Concordia Department of Economics, says: "This study furthers our understanding of how finances or lifestyle influence fruit and to eventually target groups to promote better nutrition policies."

The researchers analyzed data collected from almost 94,000 people, aged 18 to 69 years, from the Canadian Community . They looked at factors such as gender, education, income, marital and smoking status to reveal differences in how often people of various backgrounds consume fruits and vegetables.

The analyses revealed that people with low education and low income ate fruits and vegetables less frequently — about 4.5 times per day. Individuals with higher education and income, for their part, ate nature's produce a little over five times per day.

"There are also significant disparities in the frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption by demographics and lifestyle," Azagba says.

Men, singles, smokers, people in their 40s and households with no children, for example, reached for the fruit bowl less often. The research team also found that:

  • Quebecers went to the crisper more often than their counterparts in any other province. (The territories were not included).
  • Women tended to munch on fruit and vegetables more frequently (5.4 times a day) than men (4.5 times).
  • Those who have a weak social network didn't have as much appetite for fruit and vegetables as those who have strong networks of friends.
  • People with a higher level of education ate carrots and apples more frequently — regardless of other demographic and lifestyle factors.
Getting the message out

Eating a daily minimum of five servings of fruits and vegetables is proven to have a slew of health benefits. According to the World Health Organization and the Food and Agricultural Organization, an adequate intake of farm produce reduces the risks of diabetes, strokes, obesity and high blood pressure.

Despite this evidence, the study authors found fruit and vegetable consumption for most people is below the daily recommended value. They suggest that people may be encouraged to eat more broccoli and berries by raising their awareness of the health benefits through media and community-based nutrition programs, as well as through government subsidies of such produce.

"There is no one-size-fits-all strategy to promote healthy eating behaviour; a multifaceted approach would be required to successfully address the low consumption of fruit and vegetables, especially among people from low ," says Sharaf.

More information: www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/118

Provided by Concordia University

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Obesity and stress pack a double hit for health

2 hours ago

If you're overweight, you may be at greater risk for stress-related diseases like type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer, according to a new study by Brandeis University.

Sales influence consumer food shopping habits

4 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Consumers are more likely to buy high-calorie foods (HCF), but not low-calorie foods (LCF) on sale, according to a study published in the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Preventing Ch ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (5) Jan 10, 2012
Well the researchers might also be interested to know that we were actually CREATED as vegetarians!!!
If you are not familiar with this statement, it comes from the bible. I'm unfortunately not at liberty to quote the verses but you can look it up in genesis 1:29.
So here we are, about 6000 years after our creation and we're discovering that the person who made us definitely knew what was best for us. And He still does know what is best - after all He DESIGNED us.
aroc91
5 / 5 (3) Jan 10, 2012
How about genesis 1:28, douche? I have dominion over animals and I also have canine teeth, so I'm going to eat all the tasty ones I like. We can digest meat for a reason.

Kaboom! You've been lawyered.
Deathclock
5 / 5 (1) Jan 10, 2012
Well the researchers might also be interested to know that we were actually CREATED as vegetarians!!!
If you are not familiar with this statement, it comes from the bible. I'm unfortunately not at liberty to quote the verses but you can look it up in genesis 1:29.
So here we are, about 6000 years after our creation and we're discovering that the person who made us definitely knew what was best for us. And He still does know what is best - after all He DESIGNED us.


This is stupid. We are omnivores, we are VERY clearly omnivores.

Here is a website advocating vegetarianism that argues that humans are omnivores:

http://www.vrg.or...omni.htm