Why men 'exhibit warrior tendencies'

Human ancestral history of inter-tribal war has programmed men to exhibit warrior behaviour. Image courtesy of the Pitt Rivers Museum.

A new study has looked into how our psychology concerning war and conflict may have been shaped by our evolutionary past.

Following a review of current academic literature by , and anthropologists, the study concludes that men are biologically programmed to be warriors because of our deep ancestral history of inter-tribal war and . Meanwhile, females have evolved a response to threats from male outsiders where they 'tend and befriend' as a way of protecting their , suggests the study. 

In a paper published in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, researchers from Oxford, VU Amsterdam, and Michigan universities argue that although these responses may have evolved as a way of coping with threats posed by outsiders, they 'might not be functional in modern times and are often counter-productive'.

The researchers suggest that the study may help us to understand the evolutionary and biological roots of the aggressive behavior between 'tribal' factions in today’s world. The study points out that in modern cultures, this 'evolved' behavior can be observed in large-scale conflicts between countries and nations as well as in relatively small-scale skirmishes, such as between supporters of rival football teams or street gangs. 

Professor Mark van Vugt, Research Fellow at the Institute for Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology (ICEA) at the University of Oxford, said: "A solution to conflict, which is an all too common problem in societies today, remains elusive. One reason for this might be the difficulty we have in changing our mindset, which has evolved over thousands of years. Our review of the academic literature suggests that the human mind is shaped in a way that tends to perpetuate conflict with "outsiders".  

"Our research finds that conflict between rival groups of men has presented opportunities to gain access to mates, territory and increased status. We believe this has resulted through natural selection in an evolved amongst men to initiate and display acts of intergroup aggression."

The study examines current literature by evolutionary that supports what is known as the 'male warrior hypothesis'. It finds that self-report surveys consistently show that men are, on average, more likely than women to demonstrate prejudice and discrimination against men who are viewed as outsiders – and this is true across different cultures and times.

The study cites research showing that men prefer group-based social hierarchies and are more likely to strongly identify with their own group than women. Studies that show how men are more motivated to work closely together within their group if they are competing against another group are also cited.

Current academic literature demonstrates how across all cultures have been more likely than women to initiate violence in order to win the fight, the study concludes. It also says the benefits for the males of this strategy, amongst humans and among other species, are that they gain more in the group at their disposal, which results in them being more likely to successfully reproduce.

Professor Van Vugt said: "We see similar behavior in chimpanzees. For example, the males continuously monitor the borders of their territory. If a female from another group comes along, she may be persuaded to emigrate to his group. When a male strays too far, however, he is likely to be brutally beaten and possibly killed."

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Prejudice linked to women's menstrual cycle

Jun 22, 2011

Women's bias against male strangers increases when women are fertile, suggesting prejudice may be partly fueled by genetics, according to a study by Michigan State University psychology researchers.

Recommended for you

Dyscalculia: Burdened by blunders with numbers

12 hours ago

Between 3 and 6% of schoolchildren suffer from an arithmetic-related learning disability. Researchers at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (LMU) in Munich now show that these children are also more likely to exhibit deficits ...

Free help for expecting and new mums at risk of depression

13 hours ago

With postnatal depression affecting almost one in seven women giving birth in Australia, QUT and the White Cloud Foundation have launched an innovative model of care to provide early access to treatment for expecting and ...

A blood test for suicide?

17 hours ago

Johns Hopkins researchers say they have discovered a chemical alteration in a single human gene linked to stress reactions that, if confirmed in larger studies, could give doctors a simple blood test to reliably predict a ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Corban
5 / 5 (2) Jan 24, 2012
So basically, to get the genes in line with modernity, we need to pull a Lysistrata: women should favor the men who aren't warmongers, resulting in the warmongers being selected out. However, this suffers from union dynamics: if everyone doesn't agree, the dissenters can break the strike and accrue massive benefit.

In this case, the warmonger guys can stomp all over the pacifists and get all the women.

Or, some of the ladies have an even bigger pool of (disenfranchised) warmongers to choose from.
ArtflDgr
not rated yet Jan 24, 2012
then corban, the one group that renegs on that, rules the world... as is happening between the country that practices ideological pronouncements claiming that the other does it,when the other actually doesnt... in the land of the blind the one eyed woman is king...
dan42day
not rated yet Jan 25, 2012
Life has always been a competition for resources and reproduction. From the first simple single cells through today. I don't think that can ever be changed.
kochevnik
not rated yet Jan 25, 2012
Eunuchs are the best. They won't take your women, endanger your children or be involved in sex scandals or engage in nepotism, and they've passed a great test of loyalty. Some of the most persevering societies were administered by eunuchs.
finitesolutions
not rated yet Jan 28, 2012
You should not compare humans with chimpanzees. Humans' ultimate goals is to .....
finitesolutions
not rated yet Jan 28, 2012
Humans' ultimate goal might be to fill in the ciints!
Tausch
not rated yet Jan 29, 2012
Where is Otto?
Although this is behaviorism the commentator Otto might feel his views as vindicated with the sentiments express as 'research' from the researchers this article reports.