To perform with less effort, practice beyond perfection

February 9, 2012

Whether you are an athlete, a musician or a stroke patient learning to walk again, practice can make perfect, but more practice may make you more efficient, according to a surprising new University of Colorado Boulder study.

The study, led by CU-Boulder Assistant Professor Alaa Ahmed, looked at how test subjects learned particular arm-reaching movements using a . The results showed that even after a reaching task had been learned and the corresponding decrease in muscle activity had reached a stable state, the overall to the test subjects continued to decrease. By the end of the task, the net metabolic cost as measured by and carbon dioxide exhalation had decreased by about 20 percent, she said.

"The message from this study is that in order to perform with less effort, keep on practicing, even after it seems as if the task has been learned," said Ahmed of CU-Boulder's integrative physiology department. "We have shown there is an advantage to continued practice beyond any visible changes in performance."

A paper on the subject was published in the Feb. 8 issue of the . Co-authors on the study include postdoctoral fellow Helen J. Huang and Professor Rodger Kram, both in CU-Boulder's integrative physiology department. The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

The study involved 15 right-handed test subjects who used a handle on a robotic arm, similar to a joystick, to control a cursor on a computer screen. The tasks involved starting from a set position to reach for a target on the screen and involved both inward and outward arm movements, Ahmed said.

As part of the study, test subjects had to exert more energy in some reaching movements when the robotic arm created a force field, making subjects "push back" as they steered the cursor toward the target. With repeated practice of moving the robotic arm against the force fields, the subjects learned the task by not only cutting down on errors, but effort as well, according to Ahmed.

The test subjects first performed a series of 200 reaching trials with no force field to push against, then two sets of 250 trials each when pushing back against the force field. The experiment ended with another 200 trials with no force field, said Ahmed. A metronome was used to signal the test subjects to move the robotic arm every two seconds toward the target during the trials.

Each of the wore a nose clip and breathed through a mouthpiece to chart the rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production, a measure of metabolism. The research team also collected surface electromyographic data by placing electrodes on the six upper limb muscles used during reaching tasks: the pectoralis major, the posterior deltoid, the biceps brachii, the triceps long head, the triceps lateral head and the brachioradialis.

"What is unique about our study is that we are the first group to measure metabolic cost in addition to muscle activity while performing a physical reaching task," said Huang, who performed most of the research and was first author on the Journal of Neuroscience paper. "The results are very surprising and challenge the widely held assumption that muscle activity entirely explains changes in metabolic cost."

The study suggests that efficient movements ultimately involve both efficient biomechanics and efficient neural processing, or thinking. "We suspect that the decrease in metabolic cost may involve more efficient brain activity," Ahmed said. "The brain could be modulating subtle features of arm , recruiting other muscles or reducing its own activity to make the movements more efficiently."

The results could be applicable, for example, to stroke patients who have to re-learn to walk, Ahmed said. "The rehabilitation process should not necessarily stop if the patient reaches a plateau in performance," Ahmed said. Continued practice reduces the metabolic cost of the task, an indication the brain still may be learning something," she said.

"Using the robotic system, we can understand the principles underlying the control of human movement and can apply those ideas to design rehabilitation programs that may allow stroke patients to re-learn their movements faster, to retain that learning and to transfer that learning to other tasks as well," she said.

So whether it is playing a musical piece over and over again even after you have the notes and timing down cold, or throwing a ball or swinging a racket after your coach tells you things look great, there appears to still be a benefit to practicing, Ahmed said. "Just because someone can perform the task well doesn't mean there is not added benefit to continued practice."

Explore further: In motor learning, it's actions, not intentions, that count

Related Stories

In motor learning, it's actions, not intentions, that count

June 23, 2011

Albert Einstein defined insanity as "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." Practicing the same task repetitively, though, tends to be the default procedure when trying to learn a new motor ...

Recommended for you

Wiring rules untangle brain circuitry

December 1, 2015

Our brains contain billions of neurons linked through trillions of synaptic connections, and although disentangling this wiring may seem like mission impossible, a research team from Baylor College of Medicine took on the ...

Can physical exercise enhance long-term memory?

November 25, 2015

Exercise can enhance the development of new brain cells in the adult brain, a process called adult neurogenesis. These newborn brain cells play an important role in learning and memory. A new study has determined that mice ...

New insights on how cocaine changes the brain

November 25, 2015

The burst of energy and hyperactivity that comes with a cocaine high is a rather accurate reflection of what's going on in the brain of its users, finds a study published November 25 in Cell Reports. Through experiments conducted ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Feb 09, 2012
Something genuinely new, and even applicable in everyone's own life. A very good article!
not rated yet Feb 09, 2012
How do you get to Carnegie Hall?
not rated yet Feb 09, 2012
Fewer reps build more muscle.
not rated yet Feb 10, 2012
Except increasing muscle is not a motor skill. It's a metabolic reaction. Fewer reps do not make you a better guitarist.
not rated yet Feb 10, 2012
yes, the implication is that muscles reach an optimum size and response pattern for the performance of the task after which the interactions between cortex, brain stem and cerebellum can be optimised. This makes perfect sense when you consider that each time a neuron's membrane depolarises and a synapse fires, energy is required to restore them. If the brain is using about 20% of our metabolic energy then it stands to reason that finding all the energy minima for any given repeated task must pay handsomely for the individual, in their personal long-term.
not rated yet Feb 11, 2012
High 'elevationists' feel vindicated.
not rated yet Feb 12, 2012
Learning involves lots of thinking that's necessary to direct one's attention towards the object at hand, perceive information, process the information, direct one's attention towards action/interaction with the object, receive feedback (proprioceptive, visual, auditory, tactile), process the feedback, adjust one's actions, receive more feedback, etc.

There comes a time when thought - as thought is normally understood - is no longer necessary. It is sometimes said that one's body or cellular intelligence, or physical intelligence, takes over from what was formerly directed by one's intellectual (thinking) intelligence. Whatever physical intelligence actually is relative to whatever intellectual intelligence actually is in terms of the electrochemical mechanics involved, physical intelligence is incredibly faster and more efficient than intellectual intelligence. Learning to do something really well requires going beyond the need to think your way through doing it.
not rated yet Feb 13, 2012
I fail to see how this is "surprising" as the article subtitle claims, or "new" as the first comment says. Martial Arts in general have been using a "practice beyond perfection" philosophy for thousands of years, and among masters it is intuitively understood that even if two martial artists execute the same movements "perfectly", the one with more practice will expend less energy doing so.

It is, however, very good to see it finally being observed and studied scientifically in a serious context.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.