US top court wrestles with final health law hearings
Supreme Court justices battled Wednesday over the fate of US President Barack Obama's health care reforms, with liberals fighting to salvage the rest of the law if a key provision is declared unconstitutional.
The court's conservative wing questioned whether the law could survive if it is stripped of its key plank -- that all Americans must buy insurance. But they also wrestled with whether it should be struck down in its entirety.
The liberal justices argued that that was a matter for the Congress, rather than the top court, to decide.
"Why should we involve the court in making a legislative judgment?" Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Paul Clement, the lawyer representing 26 states who said the law should be struck down in its entirety.
Sotomayor contended it might be better to let Congress fix the law.
"If we strike down one provision, we're not taking that power away from Congress. Congress could look at it without the mandatory coverage provision and say this model doesn't work, let's start from the beginning," she said.
Clement responded that the requirement to buy health care was too tightly intertwined with other core provisions of the law to be separated, and that without it, the law would become "a hollow shell."
"I mean, you can't possibly think that Congress would have passed that hollow shell without the heart of the act."
The 90-minute session came on the third and final day of blockbuster hearings into the reforms, which have huge implications for the nation and the 2012 presidential elections.
"The administration remains confident that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is constitutional," White House deputy press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters after Wednesday's sessions wrapped up.
The justices held a separate hearing Wednesday on the reform's expansion of Medicaid, the public insurance program for the poor, which states oppose as coercive because they stand to lose all federal Medicaid funding if they refuse to go along with it.
The justices explored whether conditions the federal government attaches to money it gives the states can be so onerous as to be coercive, with the court dividing sharply along ideological lines.
Solicitor General Donald Verrilli closed the government's case with a final plea, not on Medicaid but the law as a whole: "I ask that the ACA be upheld."
"It's a very funny conception of liberty to force somebody to purchase insurance," Clement said in his rebuttal.
The issue of "severability" -- whether the whole law collapses if one provision is deemed unconstitutional -- took on added impetus amid doubts raised about the so-called "individual mandate."
The states challenging the health care law argue that the individual mandate creates a mammoth subsidy to insurance companies that make possible other requirements of the law.
Those include requirements that companies sell insurance to anyone who applies and forbids them denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions or raising their rates without limit.
Antonin Scalia, one of the most conservative justices, asked: "Can you see a prior case when we are asked to strike down the heart of the case and leave the rest in effect?"
But conservative chief Justice John Roberts said Congress "would have passed parts of the hollow shell," noting as did more liberal justices that many of the law's provisions were unrelated to the individual mandate.
Although the individual mandate appeared in trouble late Tuesday, some analysts said the outcome was less clear after Wednesday's session on "severability."
"The net effect may well have shored up support for the individual insurance mandate itself," wrote court-watcher Lyle Denniston in the authoritative Scotusblog.
The justices are not expected to rule on the law before June, meaning that the potentially explosive decision is likely to land right in the thick of the heated presidential campaign.
The health care law -- Obama's signature domestic achievement -- encompasses the most ambitious reform of the troubled US health care system in decades, seeking to extend health insurance to 32 million Americans who now lack it.
But since it was signed into law in 2010, the reform has divided public opinion and emerged as a major issue in the presidential campaign, attacked by Republicans as an assault on individual liberties.
Polls show weak public support for the law, with one tracking poll showing that only one in three Americans currently support the individual mandate.
(c) 2012 AFP
- Final day of Supreme Court health law hearings Mar 28, 2012 | not rated yet | 0
- US Supreme Court to decide Nov 10 on health care case Oct 26, 2011 | not rated yet | 0
- Top US court gets to heart of health reform debate Mar 27, 2012 | not rated yet | 0
- US Supreme Court opens health care reform case Mar 26, 2012 | not rated yet | 0
- US Supreme Court reveals splits on health mandate Mar 27, 2012 | not rated yet | 0
- Motion perception revisited: High Phi effect challenges established motion perception assumptions Apr 23, 2013 | 3 / 5 (2) | 2
- Anything you can do I can do better: Neuromolecular foundations of the superiority illusion (Update) Apr 02, 2013 | 4.5 / 5 (11) | 5
- The visual system as economist: Neural resource allocation in visual adaptation Mar 30, 2013 | 5 / 5 (2) | 9
- Separate lives: Neuronal and organismal lifespans decoupled Mar 27, 2013 | 4.9 / 5 (8) | 0
- Sizing things up: The evolutionary neurobiology of scale invariance Feb 28, 2013 | 4.8 / 5 (10) | 14
Classical and Quantum Mechanics via Lie algebras
Apr 15, 2011 I'd like to open a discussion thread for version 2 of the draft of my book ''Classical and Quantum Mechanics via Lie algebras'', available online at http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0810.1019 , and for the...
- More from Physics Forums - Independent Research
More news stories
(Medical Xpress)—Health care spending is much higher for older Americans than for younger adults and children, on average, and analysts have said that increasing spending leads to longer life expectancy.
Health 2 minutes ago | not rated yet | 0
(Medical Xpress)—High blood pressure is something that has traditionally been a problem in Scotland, but might there be a link to our climate?
Health 12 minutes ago | not rated yet | 0
(Medical Xpress)—A report published today shows a 2.6% decrease in the amount of alcohol sold per adult in Scotland in the year following the introduction of the Alcohol etc. (Scotland) Act in October 2011.
Health 22 minutes ago | not rated yet | 0
New mothers throughout Australia are needed to help QUT sleep researchers investigate whether the disrupted sleep experienced by mothers when caring for their new baby raises the risk of injury while driving.
Health 1 hour ago | not rated yet | 0
(Medical Xpress)—Scientists supported by the National Institutes of Health have a new theory as to why a woman's fertility declines after her mid-30s. They also suggest an approach that might help slow ...
52 minutes ago | not rated yet | 0 |
The University of Gothenburg Vaccine Research Institute (GUVAX) announces successful results in a placebo controlled phase I study of an oral, inactivated Escherichia coli diarrhea vaccine.
42 minutes ago | not rated yet | 0
(Medical Xpress)—Preschoolers universally recognize that one's choices are not always free – that our decisions may be constrained by social obligations to be nice to others or follow rules set by parents ...
52 minutes ago | not rated yet | 0
Medical researchers discover new ways to target, develop and design drugs to prevent and treat viral infection
Researchers at the University of Alberta have discovered a new drug target, developed a new drug and identified a new way to design drugs—all of which could be a winning combination in the battle against viruses.
1 hour ago | not rated yet | 0 |
Is it permissible to harm one to save many? Those who tend to say "yes" when faced with this classic dilemma are likely to be deficient in a specific kind of empathy, according to a report published in the scientific journal ...
4 hours ago | not rated yet | 0 |
(Medical Xpress)—Do ethicists engage in better moral behavior than other professors? The answer is no. Nor are they more likely than nonethicists to act according to values they espouse, according to researchers from the ...
1 hour ago | 5 / 5 (1) | 0