Hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery can perform non-emergency angioplasty safely and effectively

(Medical Xpress) -- Patients who have non-emergency angioplasty to open blocked heart vessels have no greater risk of death or complications when they have the procedure at hospitals without cardiac surgery backup. That is the conclusion of a national a study to assess the safety and effectiveness of such procedures at community hospitals.

Results of the study, called the Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team Elective Study (C-PORT-E), are being presented on March 25 at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) annual meeting in Chicago.  The study also will be published online by the New England Journal of Medicine to coincide with the ACC presentation.

The study, led by Johns Hopkins cardiologist Thomas Aversano, evaluated the nine-month outcomes of 18,867 patients who were randomly assigned to have elective heart artery-opening angioplasty or stenting at hospitals with or without cardiac surgery capability.

“Our composite endpoints in the study—death, heart attack, and blockage again in the vessel that was opened with angioplasty—showed  similar results at nine months whether the procedure was performed at a with or without cardiac surgery backup,” says Aversano, who is an associate professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

He says that there was a small difference among the two groups regarding the need for revascularization—a second procedure to open the same vessel.

“We found that more patients treated at community hospitals without surgery backup required a repeat procedure within 9 months. The size of the difference in repeat procedure rates between hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery is small, between 11 and 17 additional procedures for every 1,000 treated patients.”   He adds, “The reason for the difference is not clear except that it may reflect a more conservative approach at treating the blockage among interventional cardiologists at hospitals without cardiac surgery capability.”

The study included 60 hospitals in 10 states without cardiac surgery backup. In order to participate in the study, those hospitals had to perform a minimum of 200 angioplasty procedures each year and develop a formal angioplasty development program to prepare their staff and establish protocols and policies.

Emergency angioplasty is performed during a heart attack, when a vessel needs to be opened right away to restore blood flow in the heart. Non-emergency procedures are offered to patients with blockages that may be causing chest pain.

During angioplasty, a tiny balloon is inflated within a coronary artery to push away plaque that is causing a blockage in the vessel. Stents, which act like tiny scaffolds, also can be put in place to keep the artery open. In rare cases, the procedure can cause a tear in the vessel or closing of the artery, requiring open heart surgery to repair the problem.

Until a recent change in guidelines by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association, non-emergency angioplasty was not recommended at    without backup in case there were complications that required emergency surgery. Dr. Aversano says results of the study support the change in the guidelines.

The researchers do not believe that every hospital should be performing angioplasty. However, they wanted to know if hospitals that already offer emergency angioplasty to open blocked coronary arteries in patients can also safely and effectively perform elective angioplasty.

About 850,000 angioplasties are performed in the United States each year. “The goal of our study,” says Aversano, “is to give health care planners the best possible information on which to base their decisions about the allocation of resources, so that patients can have access to the highest quality of care.”

The CPORT study centers, which include Johns Hopkins, Duke University and Clinical Trials and Surveys Corp. (formerly the Maryland Medical Research Institute), are funded by the hospitals participating in the study.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Results of RIBS IV trial reported

3 hours ago

A new clinical trial comparing the use of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and drug-eluting balloons (DEB) in treating in-stent restenosis (ISR) from drug-eluting stents found that EES provided superior late angiographic results ...

Results of DKCRUSH-VI trial reported

3 hours ago

A new study found that fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided provisional side branch (SB) stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions yields similar outcomes to the current standard of care. The DKCRUSH-VI clinical trial ...

Results of IVUS-CTO trial reported at TCT 2014

3 hours ago

A new study found that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) -guided intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) could improve outcomes compared to a conventional angiography-guided approach during percutaneous ...

Results of OCT STEMI trial reported at TCT 2014

3 hours ago

The first randomized trial to examine serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was reported at the 26th annual Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific ...

INR variability predicts warfarin adverse effects

9 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Unstable anticoagulation predicts warfarin adverse effects regardless of time in therapeutic range, according to a study published online Sept. 2 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Ou ...

User comments