Latest data confirms high failure rates for metal-on-metal hip replacements

March 12, 2012

Ten days after the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced that patients who have received stemmed metal-on-metal (MOM) hip replacements will need annual check-ups, The Lancet publishes "unequivocal evidence" from the largest database on hip replacements in the world, confirming that stemmed MOM implants are failing at much higher rates than other types, particularly those with larger head sizes and those implanted in women, in whom failure rates are up to four-times higher. The authors call for a ban on the use of stemmed MOM hip implants.

Although the use of stemmed MOM has declined in England and Wales, recent data suggest they are still extensively used in the USA, with 35% of hip replacements using MOM implants in 2009. The use of large-head stemmed MOM implants became popular because it was believed that they reduced the likelihood of dislocation and were highly resistant to wear.

In this study, a team led by Ashley Blom from the University of Bristol, UK, analysed data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales including more than 400 000 hip replacements (of which 31 171 were MOM) undertaken between 2003 and 2011 that were tracked for up to 7 years after surgery. They estimated failure rates for stemmed MOM implants based on different head sizes and compared them with implants made from ceramic and polythene.

Stemmed MOM failed much more quickly than other types of bearing , with a 5-year revision rate of 6.2%. Failure was related to head size, with larger heads failing earlier, corresponding to a 2% increase in the risk of failure for each 1mm increase in head size. By contrast, ceramic-on-ceramic implants did better with larger head sizes.

In women, failure rates for stemmed MOM implants were up to four-times higher than those of other bearing surfaces, and were also higher compared with men even with the same head size.

The authors conclude: "Metal-on-metal stemmed articulations give poor implant survival compared with other options and should not be implanted. All patients with these bearings should be carefully monitored, particularly young women implanted with large diameter heads."

In an accompany Comment, Art Sedrakyan from Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, warns of the current situation in the USA: "The National Institutes of Health is interested in new discoveries and, until recently, not in infrastructure for comparative safety and effectiveness...There is also substantial pressure from Congress not to stifle innovation and to undertake faster reviews...[These practices] fail to recognise that only a large national, or even worldwide, registry can address the needs when more than 10 000 products are on the market for the same purpose."

He adds: "Policy makers need to appreciate that registry data alone are not a substitute for good premarketing studies, which should include testing of implants. When failures take a long time to develop, many faulty products can enter the market. In the case of the ASR and metal-on-metal implants it took 4-5 years before evidence was accumulated and reported. We are left with more than 500 000 patients with metal-on-metal prostheses in USA and more than 40 000 in the UK who are at elevated risk of device failure, which will inevitably result in the burden of further surgical treatment as well as billions of dollars in costs to taxpayers."

Explore further: New hip implants no better than traditional implants

More information:

Related Stories

UK says metal hip replacements more troublesome

September 16, 2011

(AP) -- People who get metal hip replacements are more likely to need a replacement compared to those who get a traditional plastic one, according to a new report from a large British registry.

Lifelong checks for metal hip implant patients

March 1, 2012

The UK government's health regulator has advised new checks for patients who have undergone large head metal-on-metal hip replacements, following a major investigation by Newcastle University engineers.

UK demands data on breast implant ruptures

January 4, 2012

(AP) -- Britain's health secretary has demanded that private U.K. clinics supply data by the end of the week on how many French-made PIP breast implants have ruptured in Britain.

Recommended for you

International study proves old blood is as good as new

October 24, 2016

It's been long thought that when blood transfusions are needed, it may be best to use the freshest blood, but McMaster University researchers have led a large international study proving that it is not so.

Study finds mixed results for use of mesh for hernia repair

October 18, 2016

Among patients undergoing incisional hernia repair, the use of mesh to reinforce the repair was associated with a lower risk of hernia recurrence over 5 years compared with when mesh was not used, although with long-term ...

Traditional surgery style worthwhile, says piles trial

October 10, 2016

Results of a five year trial on haemorrhoids (commonly known as piles), jointly sponsored by NHS Highland and the University of Aberdeen, have this week been published in The Lancet, one of the world's oldest and best known ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.