Raiders of the lost blood spots

By Nonie Arora
Blood Spots Assessed by CDC

Almost every newborn in the United States is pricked on the heel within hours of birth for a few drops of blood that are then tested for conditions like PKU, sickle cell anemia, and cystic fibrosis. But then the sample is often put on small piece of blotter paper and filed away by the state. Few parents know about these millions of residual dried blood spots.

Alex Kemper, Duke professor of pediatrics and community and family medicine, spoke at the Genomics and Personalized Medicine Forum on the “raiders” of these lost , researchers who might use them to improve public health. Along with issues of science, he addressed the negative public reaction to research using stored blood spots. “Why does the government have my DNA?”

Dried blood spots have many uses beyond early detection of diseases. They can be used to improve quality of current screening tests and new screening approaches. In a few cases, dried blood spots have been valuable in forensic analysis to identify an abducted child. In this era of increasingly personalized medicine, being able to use blood spots for genomic analysis would provide answers to new research questions, Kemper said.

However, the differences in the way blood spots are stored present research challenges. Kemper is very interested in how environmental toxins affect children’s health. When his research team attempted to use dried blood spots to study how flame-retardants affect thyroid problems, they ran into a major problem. Because blood spots are often stored in an environment more like the warehouse from Raiders of the Lost Ark than a controlled lab environment, the specimens were too contaminated to use for research.

Besides the inherent quality concerns, the public is wary of researchers using blood spots because of the lack of consent and confidentiality. (See “Texas Newborn Bloodspot Saga”) Should researchers be able to use blood spots from infants without consent from ? Should the blood spots be anonymized to protect privacy even though anonymization limits the types of research that can be performed?

These questions do not have easy answers.

States differ on legislation about the retention, confidentiality, and parental control of blood spots. Some states have no rules at all. Kemper claimed that many of these laws are currently in “a state of flux” because of pending lawsuits and changing public perceptions. As the rules change, one thing is almost certain: improving the genetic literacy of the public is essential to advancing uses of dried blood spots.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Student seeks to improve pneumonia vaccines

12 hours ago

Almost a million Americans fall ill with pneumonia each year. Nearly half of these cases require hospitalization, and 5-7 percent are fatal. Current vaccines provide protection against some strains of the ...

Seabed solution for cold sores

14 hours ago

The blue blood of abalone, a seabed delicacy could be used to combat common cold sores and related herpes virus following breakthrough research at the University of Sydney.

Better living through mitochondrial derived vesicles

Aug 19, 2014

(Medical Xpress)—As principal transformers of bacteria, organelles, synapses, and cells, vesicles might be said to be the stuff of life. One need look no further than the rapid rise to prominence of The ...

Zebrafish help to unravel Alzheimer's disease

Aug 19, 2014

New fundamental knowledge about the regulation of stem cells in the nerve tissue of zebrafish embryos results in surprising insights into neurodegenerative disease processes in the human brain. A new study by scientists at ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tkjtkj
not rated yet Mar 13, 2012
re: "..As the rules change, one thing is almost certain: improving the genetic literacy of the public is essential to advancing uses of dried blood spots."

yes , that is 'oNe thing' but there are others equally important, if not more-so:
Eg, the public must become assured and confident that government/science access and use of genetic information is adequately provided by very strong privacy laws!! I personally do not think this is possible, given news reports on near-daily basis involving inappropriate access to internet data collections. Further, why are governments storing this information??? It is patently outrageous that once the collected samples have satisfied 'neonatal testing' that the samples are not returned to the parent !!