ACR updates guidelines for use of DMARDs and biologic drugs in treating rheumatoid arthritis

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) has released the 2012 recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The guidelines published today in the ACR journal, Arthritis Care & Research, are an update to the 2008 recommendations and address the issues of initiating and switching drugs, screening for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation, immunization, and the use of biologics in high-risk RA patients.

More than one million Americans suffer with RA—a chronic disease that causes pain, swelling and inflammation in the lining of the joints—and 75% of those affected are women according to the ACR. DMARDs such as methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine may be used individually or in combination with to treat RA. Biological agents include the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors adalimumab, cerotlizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab or infliximab; or the non-TNF biological drugs, abatacept, tocilizumab or rituximab. Biologics should not be used together.

"Effective of RA is essential to control disease progression and improve quality of life for patients," says Dr. Jasvinder Singh with the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the principal investigator for the 2012 update of the ACR RA guidelines for the use of DMARDs and biological agents. "With additional advancements in RA therapies since 2008, it was important to update recommendations that help guide rheumatologists in treating RA patients receiving DMARDs or biologic therapies."

The 2012 DMARD and recommendations included a number of areas but concentrated on four updated sections:

  • Indications for use and switching of DMARDs and biologics
  • Use of biologic agents in high-risk RA patients with hepatitis, cancer, or congestive heart failure
  • Screening for TB in RA patients starting or receiving biologic drugs
  • Vaccination in patients starting or receiving DMARDS or biologics
Dr. Singh further explains, "The recommendations for DMARD and biologic treatment provide a guide for rheumatologists who care for RA patients. However, these guidelines should not replace important physician-patient discussions or individual clinical decisions that take into account assessments of risk-benefits, patient preferences, and economic considerations."

The authors suggest that low disease activity or remission should be the goal for each RA patient, but each patient's therapy target should be specific to their particular health needs. One of the noted changes from the 2008 guidelines is more aggressive treatment in with early RA that is within six months of symptom onset. Researchers believe the recommended change to more intensive early therapy is that earlier treatment may provide better outcomes; joint damage in RA is irreversible, making prevention of damage an important goal; and preserving physical function and health-related quality of life is necessary to reduce disability.

A related editorial is also available today in & Research. Co-author Dr. David Daikh, Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco and Chief of Rheumatology at the VA Medical Center comments, "The treatment of RA is a rapidly changing field with new therapies regularly becoming available. As this field evolves, the recommendations for treatment with DMARDs and biologic drugs will need to be modified in the future and the ACR must be nimble in keeping these as current as possible."

More information: "2012 Update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology Recommendations for the Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Biologic Agents in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis." Jasvinder A. Singh, Daniel E. Furst, Aseem Bharat, Jeffrey R. Curtis, Arthur F. Kavanaugh, Joel M. Kremer, Larry W. Moreland, James O'Dell, Kevin L. Winthrop, Timothy Beukelman, S. Louis Bridges Jr., W. Winn Chatham, Harold E. Paulus, Maria Suarez-Almazor, Claire Bombardier, Maxime Dougados, Dinesh Khanna, Charles M. King, Amye L. Leong, Eric L. Matteson, John T. Schousboe, Eileen Moynihan, Karen S. Kolba, Archana Jain, Elizabeth R. Volkmann, Harsh Agrawal, Sangmee Bae, Amy S. Mudano, Nivedita M. Patkar, and Kenneth G. Saag. Arthritis Care & Research; Published Online: April 2, 2012 (DOI: 10.1002/acr.21641).

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New guidelines for treating rheumatoid arthritis

Jul 22, 2008

Proven combinations of medicines and the introduction of new anti-arthritis drugs have significantly improved the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), according to guidelines issued by the American College of Rheumatology ...

Fostamatinib proven to be safe but not effective

Jan 27, 2011

In a previous study, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who failed to respond to methotrexate were shown to experience positive results with fostamatinib disodium (R788), an oral spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitor that ...

Recommended for you

ACR: Most hospitalizations for gout are preventable

Nov 18, 2014

(HealthDay)—Most hospitalizations for a primary diagnosis of gout are preventable, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, held from Nov. 14 to 19 in ...

TNF inhibitors may increase cancer risk in the eye

Nov 17, 2014

One of the family of drugs prescribed for rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions is called TNF inhibitors. They act by dampening part of the immune system called tumor necrosis factor (TNF). In one of the ...

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.