Guidelines for prostate screening widely ignored

April 24, 2012 in Cancer

Guidelines for prostate screening widely ignored

Enlarge

A surgical team performs a robotic prostatectomey at the University of Chicago Medicine Credit: Bruce Powell for the University of Chicago Medicine

New research confirms that the controversial decision by Warren Buffet – the 81-year-old CEO of Berkshire Hathaway – to undergo a blood test screening for prostate cancer despite his age is hardly unusual. Despite recommendations in 2008 from the United States Preventive Services Task Force against testing for prostate cancer in men aged 75 years or older, almost half of men in that age group continue to get screening tests.

In 2005, before the recommendations were released, 43 percent of age 75 and above elected to take the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. In August 2008, the stated it "recommends against the service," arguing "there is moderate or high certainty the service has no net benefit or that the harms outweigh the benefits."

Survey results from 2010, however, published in the April 25, 2012, issue of JAMA, found that two years after the Task Force's recommendations were announced, the rate for that group of men had gone up slightly, to 43.9 percent. This is higher than the rates for men in their 40s (12.5 percent) or 50s (33.2 percent), who are more likely to benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Only men aged 60 to 74 were more likely to get the screening test (51.2 percent).

"PSA screening for more than 40 percent of men 75 or older is inappropriate," said study author Scott Eggener, MD, assistant professor of surgery at the University of Chicago Medicine. "Selective screening is reasonable to consider for the healthiest men over age 75, but for the large majority of men in this age group, early detection can lead to treatment of a disease that will probably never cause a problem. A substantial proportion of men over 75 with an elevated PSA will die from something else before a prostate cancer interferes with the quality or duration of their life."

"Our data are likely an underestimate," the authors note. They worked with information from the 2005 and 2010 Cancer Control Supplements, part of the annual National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which gathers information through in-person interviews and is a representative sample of the US population. "Self-reported screening rates in the NHIS," they note, "are predominantly lower compared with medical record extraction."

The revised draft recommendations presented in October 2011 by the USPSTF are even more critical of PSA screening than the 2008 version, suggesting there was not enough evidence that PSA screening improves health outcomes to routinely recommend the test for men at any age. "Prostate-specific antigen–based screening results in small or no reduction in prostate cancer–specific mortality," the Task Force concludes. It is associated with "harms related to subsequent evaluation and treatments, some of which may be unnecessary." These draft recommendations are not finalized yet but are expected to be forthcoming soon.

Clinical practice patterns following the 2011 USPSTF recommendations "should be monitored," the study authors conclude. Even if PSA screening is discouraged in the final USPSTF recommendation, "I'm not anticipating a massive change in utilization," Eggener said, based on a general tendency for individuals and physicians to support cancer screening, evidence that fewer men are dying of since the introduction of PSA, subsequent confusion about the recommendation among the general public, and ongoing concern about the disease.

Provided by University of Chicago Medical Center search and more info website

not rated yet  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

SDrapak
Apr 24, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
"early detection can lead to treatment of a disease that will probably never cause a problem"

This is not an issue about whether to give the test or not then, it's about whether to give the follow-up treatment if disease is found. Which is under the control of the doctors.
There's no reason to stick your head in the sand and pretend the disease isn't there if it is. It's always better to be informed about your health, regardless of what you do about it.
Rank not rated yet
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Small cancer risk following CT scans in childhood and adolescence confirmed

The gap between life expectancy in patients with a mental illness and the general population has widened since 1985 and efforts to reduce this gap should focus on improving physical health, suggest researchers in a paper ...

Cancer created 3 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Changing cancer's environment to halt its spread

By studying the roles two proteins, thrombospondin-1 and prosaposin, play in discouraging cancer metastasis, a trans-Atlantic research team has identified a five-amino acid fragment of prosaposin that significantly reduces ...

Cancer created 4 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Novel RNA-based classification system for colorectal cancer

A novel transcriptome-based classification of colon cancer that improves the current disease stratification based on clinicopathological variables and common DNA markers is presented in a study published in PLOS Medicine this w ...

Cancer created 5 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Low radiation scans help identify cancer in earliest stages

A study of veterans at high risk for developing lung cancer shows that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can be highly effective in helping clinicians spot tiny lung nodules which, in a small number of patients, may indicate ...

Cancer created 6 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Poliovirus vaccine trial shows early promise for recurrent glioblastoma

An attack on glioblastoma brain tumor cells that uses a modified poliovirus is showing encouraging results in an early study to establish the proper dose level, researchers at Duke Cancer Institute report.

Cancer created 8 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


If you can remember it, you can remember it wrong

(Medical Xpress)—Native peoples in regions where cameras are uncommon sometimes react with caution when their picture is taken. The fear that something must have been stolen from them to create the photo ...

B vitamins could delay dementia

(Medical Xpress)—Despite spending billions of dollars on research and development, drug companies have been unable to come up with effective treatments for dementia and Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Now, A. ...

New sleeping pill poised to hit US markets

An experimental sleeping pill from US drug company Merck is effective at helping people fall and stay asleep, according to reviewers at the US Food and Drug Administration, which could soon approve the new drug.

Reducing caloric intake delays nerve cell loss

Activating an enzyme known to play a role in the anti-aging benefits of calorie restriction delays the loss of brain cells and preserves cognitive function in mice, according to a study published in the May ...

Insight into the dazzling impact of insulin in cells

Australian scientists have charted the path of insulin action in cells in precise detail like never before. This provides a comprehensive blueprint for understanding what goes wrong in diabetes.

Antidepressant reduces stress-induced heart condition

A drug commonly used to treat depression and anxiety may improve a stress-related heart condition in people with stable coronary heart disease, according to researchers at Duke Medicine.