The Medical Minute: Food allergies -- testing and diagnosis

May 9, 2012 By Tracy B. Fausnight, M.D.

A peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Milk and cookies. Comfort food, or food to fear?

Food allergies affect 4 percent of adults and 5 percent of young children. Many more people suspect that they have food allergies when they may not. Before you change your diet, which may put you at risk for or may affect your quality of life, it is important that you receive the . You should meet with your physician to discuss your concerns and to undergo further evaluation.

Your doctor often will perform testing when you have certain symptoms that occur shortly after eating, most often associated with a particular food. These symptoms may include a rash, such as hives or eczema; mouth or throat itching, throat tightness or trouble breathing; vomiting, or diarrhea; or a drop in blood pressure.

Both allergy skin testing and allergy blood testing are commonly used to test for food allergies. Skin testing involves gently placing a small amount of a food extract under the skin using a plastic needle-like device (I work with children, so we do not use needles). If you are allergic, there will be redness and swelling at the skin test site. The testing is safe, the results are available within minutes and they can be discussed at the same office visit. With blood testing, I can look at the level of specific allergy antibody to the food that is present. However, the results from this test are not usually available the same day.

Positive tests, either by skin or by blood, only indicate the presence of allergy antibody to the food. The presence of allergy antibody alone does not mean that you will have a reaction when eating the food. There are other reasons why these tests can be positive. Your history is very important. An is trained to interpret the skin testing, , and patient history to help determine if there is a true food allergy.

Also, testing alone cannot predict how you will react to a type of food. The larger the skin test reaction and the higher the amount of allergy antibody on the blood test can predict the likelihood of a reaction, but not the severity of a reaction. For example, people with larger skin test reactions to peanut are more likely to have a reaction when exposed to peanut as compared to people with small reactions to peanut; however, they are not more likely to have more severe reactions.

If your history is consistent with a food allergy and the testing supports the diagnosis, then a physician supervised oral challenge—eating the food suspected of causing a problem—is often not necessary. If the diagnosis is uncertain, then an oral challenge is extremely important in determining if there is a true food allergy. Also, many children outgrow their food allergies. Food challenges are essential to see if a has been outgrown. A food challenge is the definitive test for food allergies – if a person can eat the food without any reactions, he or she is not allergic to it, no matter what the testing shows.

Explore further: Children restricting diets based on incomplete allergy information

Related Stories

Test to improve peanut allergy diagnosis

March 20, 2012

(Medical Xpress) -- Researchers from Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and the University of Melbourne have identified a new way to accurately test for peanut allergy.

Recommended for you

Epigenomic changes are key to innate immunological memory

August 31, 2015

A research team led by Keisuke Yoshida and Shunsuke Ishii of the RIKEN Molecular Genetics Laboratory has revealed that epigenomic changes induced by pathogen infections, mediated by a transcription factor called ATF7, are ...

Team finds early inflammatory response paralyzes T cells

August 18, 2015

In a discovery that is likely to rewrite immunology text books, researchers at UC Davis have found that early exposure to inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 2, can "paralyze" CD4 T cells, immune components that help ...

SIV shrugs off antibodies in vaccinated monkeys

August 11, 2015

New research on monkeys vaccinated against HIV's relative SIV calls into question an idea that has driven AIDS vaccine work for years. The assumption: a protective vaccine only needs to stimulate moderate levels of antibodies ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.