PRAGUE-12 trial: Randomized open multicenter study

August 28, 2012

The PRAGUE-12 trial is a randomized open multicenter study comparing cardiac surgery with MAZE versus cardiac surgery without MAZE in patients with coronary and/or valvular heart disease and with atrial fibrillation.

Surgical ablation of the to restore regular sinus rhythm is widely used in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing . The restoration of sinus rhythm might decrease the risk of heart failure, stroke and death during long-term follow up.(1) However, despite its promise, this theoretical benefit has never been clearly established - previous randomised studies have been small and performed in a selected group of patients undergoing .

Now, a multicentre study of surgical ablation (using the MAZE procedure) organised by and cardiac surgeons at the Cardiocenter in Prague, Czech Republic, has assessed its long-term impact in patients with AF referred for cardiac surgery (for /repair, or combined surgery). The study tested the hypothesis that the MAZE procedure would increase sinus rhythm prevalence one year after surgery without increasing peri-procedural complications, and possibly improve the long-term (mortality, heart failure, stroke, bleeding).

Results of the study, presented here today by Professor Petr Widimsky from the Cardiocenter of Charles University, Prague, first confirmed that the MAZE procedure performed during cardiac surgery does indeed improve the likelihood of sinus rhythm presence one year post-operatively. However, said Professor Widimsky, this effect was significant only among patients with permanent pre-operative AF. Further results also showed that the MAZE procedure had a neutral effect (neither negative nor positive) on mortality, stroke or other hard clinical end-points during one year follow up.

The primary efficacy outcome of the study was the presence of sinus rhythm (with no episode of atrial fibrillation) during 24-hour ECG monitoring one year after surgery. The primary safety outcome was the combined endpoint of death/myocardial infarction/stroke or transient ischemic attack/new onset renal failure requiring hemodialysis at 30 days.

Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary safety outcome registered after one year, bleeding complications, heart failure, use of anticoagulation at one year, use of antiarhythmis drugs at one year, pacemaker or cardioverter implantation, and catheter .

Detailed results showed that the MAZE procedure prolonged total surgical time by 20 minutes (220 min. MAZE vs. 200 min. no-MAZE). Holter monitoring one year after surgery revealed sinus rhythm without any AF episodes in 60.2% of MAZE patients vs. 35.5% of the no-MAZE group (p=0.002). The combined safety endpoint (MACE) at 30 days was positive in 10.3% MAZE vs. 14.7% no-MAZE (not significant). There was no change in either the left ventricular ejection fraction or in the left atrial diameter. All-cause one year mortality was 16.2% in the MAZE group and 17.4% in the no-MAZE group (not significant). Stroke occurred in 2.7% MAZE vs. 4.3% no-MAZE (p=0.319).

There was a slight trend towards more hospitalisations for during one year among non-MAZE patients (26.1%) than among MAZE 23.4% (p=0.680). Major bleeding occurred in 9.9% MAZE vs. 9.8% non-MAZE (p=0.654).

When patients were divided into subgroups based on AF type at randomisation, there was no difference between the MAZE and non-MAZE groups in the presence of sinus rhythm at one year among paroxysmal or persistent AF patients. There was, however, a highly significant increase in sinus rhythm restoration rate among patients with permanent AF treated by MAZE at one year (53.2% vs. 13.9%, p<0.001). The number of true responders (that is, the percentage of patients who had AF at the time of surgery and sinus rhythm at one year) was 56% MAZE vs. 17% non-MAZE (p=0.000029).

More information: 1. The MAZE procedure is a surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation in which several incisions are made on the left and right atriums of the heart to form scar tissue. The scar tissue inhibits the transmission of electrical signals, thereby reducing the incidence of the arrhythmia.

Related Stories

New procedure treats atrial fibrillation

June 28, 2011

Doctors at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis are performing a new procedure to treat atrial fibrillation, a common irregular heartbeat.

The big risk factor for stroke that you may not know you have

September 15, 2011

A cardiac condition called atrial fibrillation, the most common cardiac arrhythmia, can increase your risk of stroke by 500 percent. That's why Anne B. Curtis, MD, Charles and Mary Bauer Professor and Chair of the University ...

Recommended for you

Heart attack treatment hypothesis 'busted'

July 6, 2015

Researchers have long had reason to hope that blocking the flow of calcium into the mitochondria of heart and brain cells could be one way to prevent damage caused by heart attacks and strokes. But in a study of mice engineered ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.