Autistic adults have unreliable neural responses, study finds

The top panel shows a map of the brain responses to the visual stimulation; they are similar across autism and control groups. The bottom left panel shows visual system responses of two individuals – one with autism and one control. The average responses - across trials - are similar in terms of amplitude and shape, yet the trial-by-trial variability is much larger in the individual with autism (error bars are much larger). The bottom right panel shows that this is not a consequence of different head motion between the two individuals as both moved their head to a similar degree. Credit: Carnegie Mellon University

Autism is a disorder well known for its complex changes in behavior—including repeating actions over and over and having difficulty with social interactions and language. Current approaches to understanding what causes these atypical behaviors focus primarily on specific brain regions associated with these specific behaviors without necessarily linking back to fundamental properties of the brain's signaling abilities.

New research led by Carnegie Mellon University neuroscientists takes the first step toward deciphering the connection between general brain function and the emergent behavioral patterns in autism. Published in the journal Neuron, the study shows that autistic adults have unreliable neural sensory responses to visual, auditory and somatosensory, or touch, stimuli. This poor response reliability appears to be a fundamental neural characteristic of autism.

"Within the autism research community, most researchers are looking for the location in the brain where autism happens," said Ilan Dinstein, a in Carnegie Mellon's Department of Psychology and lead author of the study. "We're taking a different approach and thinking about how a general characteristic of the brain could be different in autism—and how that might lead to behavioral changes."

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
New research led by Carnegie Mellon University neuroscientists takes the first step towards deciphering the connection between general brain function and the emergent behavioral patterns in autism. Published in the journal Neuron, the study shows that autistic adults have unreliable neural sensory responses to visual, auditory and somatosensory, or touch, stimuli. This poor response reliability appears to be a fundamental neural characteristic of autism. Credit: Carnegie Mellon University

For the study, 14 adults with autism and 14 without—all between the ages of 19 and 39—completed sensory experiments while inside a (fMRI) machine located at CMU's Scientific Imaging and Brain Research center. To test the visual system's , participants were shown a pattern of moving dots. The auditory stimulation consisted of pure tones presented to both ears, and short air puffs were used to stimulate the somatosensory senses. The fMRI measured each individual's during the experiments.

In all of the primary cortices, visual, auditory and somatosensory, the within-individual response reliability was significantly lower—by 30-40 percent—in autism; meaning, there was not a typical, predictable response from trial to trial. Thus, in the individuals with autism, there was significant intra-individual variability, with responses varying from strong to weak. Non-autistic adults had replicable and consistent responses from trial to trial.

"This suggests that there is something very fundamental that is altered in the cortical responses in individual's with autism," said Marlene Behrmann, professor of psychology at CMU and a leading expert on using brain imaging to understand autism. "It also begins to build a bridge between the kind of genetic changes that might have given rise to autism in the first place—and the kind of changes in the brain that are responsible for autistic behavioral patterns.

"And, what I think is so powerful is that we sampled visual, auditory and somatosensory senses. We were unbelievably thorough and attacked every sensory modality and showed the same pattern of unreliability across all three senses."

Across participants, the signal-to-noise ratio within the brain was weaker in the autism group. Signal-to-noise is a ratio of the average signal strength in comparison to the trial-by-trial variability. Credit: Carnegie Mellon University

The study also presents the first time that researchers have investigated multiple sensory systems—at a primary level—within the same autistic individual.

"One of the problems with autism is that there is considerable variability in symptoms across individuals," Dinstein said. "In this case, we have a tremendous amount of data on each individual and each of their three sensory systems. And, we see the same unreliability across all of them in autism relative to the controls."

While this study focused on adults, the team plans on taking the research further to study how the details of sensory unreliability play out in younger autistic groups.

"We are not suggesting that unreliable sensory—visual, auditory, touch—responses cause autism," said David Heeger, professor of psychology and neural science at New York University. "But rather that autism might be a consequence of unreliable activity throughout the brain during development. We've measured it in sensory areas of the brain but we hypothesize that the same kind of unreliability might be what's limiting the development of social and language abilities in the areas that subserve those functions."

In addition to expanding to determine when and how basic neural processing affects autism, the research may have clinical implications.

"The poor cortical response reliability observed in the individuals with autism in this study may represent a biomarker which could contribute to better define Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) subtypes," said Pauline Chaste, a visiting research scholar at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center who was not affiliated with the research but studies how genetic mutations affect psychiatric disorders. "This is very important because of the great heterogeneity of phenotype in ASD which makes the definition of subphenotypes critical for genetic studies as well as for treatment studies. Thus, the use of this biomarker may help to define new targets for treatment but also to assess efficacy. Moreover this study brings new insight into understanding atypical sensory sensitivity in , which is a major concern for a vast majority of patients and remains sorely underexplored."

More information: Dinstein et al.: "Unreliable evoked responses in autism." DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.026

Related Stories

New research may lead to improved diagnosis of autism

May 31, 2011

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may provide an early and objective indicator of autism, according to researchers at Columbia University in New York City, who used the technique to document language impairment ...

Weaker brain 'sync' may be early sign of autism

Jun 22, 2011

In a novel imaging study of sleeping toddlers, scientists at the University of California, San Diego Autism Center of Excellence report that a diminished ability of a young brain's hemispheres to "sync" with one another could ...

Recommended for you

Researchers unlock mystery of skin's sensory abilities

Dec 19, 2014

Humans' ability to detect the direction of movement of stimuli in their sensory world is critical to survival. Much of this stimuli detection comes from sight and sound, but little is known about how the ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jeddy_Mctedder
1 / 5 (3) Sep 19, 2012
the 'science' on autism ought to be taken with a huge grain of salt. if the proper function of the brain is not understood, which it isn't, and we only learn what is 'normal' by finding pathologies and studying them---we are heading down a very slippery path if we are too confident in believing that we have a firm and precise understanding of the proper function of the brain, let alone the pathology. precisely when in comes to a wholistic 'diagnosis' such as autism. which is a wide spread and poorly understood set of symptoms , rather than a particular 'disease' onto itself.
Sonhouse
5 / 5 (3) Sep 19, 2012
So you would take all the neurological research and chuck it and substitute what, bible study?
knutsonp
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 20, 2012
Autism certainly manifests itself as a systemic disease. However, the brain may not even be the source of the problem. I have watched my son recover from acute autism to high-functioning autism primarily as a function of diet. There is research pointing to gut dysfunction -- improper/incomplete digestion of gluten and casein caused by damaged digestive tracts -- products of which appear as opiates, and interfere with mental functions. That being said, autism was accompanied by perpetual loose stools, a problem which has disappeared with the remission of autistic behavior. We started with the GFCF diet, and for a year we have been on the SCD diet, with hope that his digestive system will heal, and full recovery will be soon realized.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.