Canada should remove section of Criminal Code that permits physical punishment of children

To promote good parenting, Canada should remove section 43 of its Criminal Code because it sends the wrong message that using physical punishment to discipline children is acceptable, argues Dr. John Fletcher, Editor-in-Chief, CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) in an editorial.

Section 43 of the Criminal Code of Canada states "…a parent is justified in using force by way of correction…if the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances."

The debate over whether spanking children is acceptable as a disciplinary tool for parents or whether it is violence against children is heated and ongoing. Although spanking was an accepted form of discipline for past generations, attitudes have shifted.

"So heated is this debate, and so long-running, that the question of whether spanking is morally 'right or wrong' is probably intractable," writes Dr. Fletcher. "A more promising line of enquiry, however, is whether the of children is effective."

A recently published analysis in that summarizes 20 years' of research on the topic suggests that physical punishment of children can result in increased and in adulthood.

Rather than making spanking of children a crime, emphasis should be placed on educating parents on alternative forms of discipline. This could be done through parenting programs, which have been successful in teaching and helping improve children's behaviour, offering them in the early years and when children enter school.

"Surely any bias should be toward protecting children, who are the most vulnerable," Dr. Fletcher writes. "To have a specific code excusing parents is to suggest that assault by a parent is a normal and accepted part of bringing up children. It is not. While section 43 stands, it is a constant excuse for parents to cling to an ineffective method of child discipline when better approaches are available. It is time for Canada to remove this anachronistic excuse for poor parenting from the statute book."

More information: www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.121070

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Spanking Can Make Children More Aggressive Later: Study

Apr 12, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Children who are spanked frequently at age 3 are more likely to be aggressive when they’re 5, even when you account for possible confounding factors, according to a new study co-authored by Tulane University ...

Don't spank or scream: Tips for taming unruly kids

Jun 10, 2011

Do you ever swat your child on the behind? Let’s hope not. Over the past few decades, numerous studies have concluded that spanking isn’t the best or most effective way to discipline a child successfully.

Recommended for you

Mothers don't speak so clearly to their babies

Jan 23, 2015

People have a distinctive way of talking to babies and small children: We speak more slowly, using a sing-song voice, and tend to use cutesy words like "tummy". While we might be inclined to think that we ...

Explainer: What is sexual fluidity?

Jan 23, 2015

Sexual preferences are not set in stone and can change over time, often depending on the immediate situation the individual is in. This has been described as sexual fluidity. For example, if someone identifies as heterosexual but th ...

Lucky charms: When are superstitions used most?

Jan 23, 2015

It might be a lucky pair of socks, or a piece of jewelry; whatever the item, many people turn to a superstition or lucky charm to help achieve a goal. For instance, you used a specific avatar to win a game and now you see ...

Low-income boys fare worse in wealth's shadow

Jan 22, 2015

Low-income boys fare worse, not better, when they grow up alongside more affluent neighbors, according to new findings from Duke University. In fact, the greater the economic gap between the boys and their neighbors, the ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Tom_Hennessy
3 / 5 (4) Sep 04, 2012
One must remember , this opinion is coming from someone who thinks people who are intersexual are , medically , normal.
freethinking
2.3 / 5 (3) Sep 04, 2012
Progressive garbage. Truth #1, Progressives DO NOT CARE about children just control, this is another example.
ForFreeMinds
1 / 5 (1) Sep 10, 2012
This is a good example of government taking away freedom from parents, to increase their control over us.

What is a parent to do when their child engages in behavior that endangers or harms other people or their property? The government says don't touch them, just talk to them (of course, with no physical discipline and no way to enforce non-physical discipline, the kid will just talk back, walk away, or otherwise ignore their parents). Then the parent is held liable for the damage their kids do, and they will be sent to jail if they discipline their kid. Talk about a no win situation.

I propose that government employees be personally responsible for damage caused by kids, since they want to take away the freedom from other parents to discipline their children. Then parents can just call up some government worker to let them use force to discipline the kids, or pay for the damages out of their personal pockets (not taxpayers).

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.