Research underscores Truvada's potency in preventing the transmission of HIV

The new study, available online today in Science Translational Medicine, builds on the 2010 "iPrEx" clinical study in which Dr. Grant and his colleagues found that Truvada—which had been used for years to treat HIV-positive patients—could also prevent new infections in people likely to come in contact with the virus. But questions about the drug's real-world effectiveness at preventing HIV transmission remained—particularly concerning the issue of adherence to a regimen of taking a pill every day.

"After the initial iPrEx study, there was concern that the protective effect of Truvada was fragile, and that individuals taking the drug would need to adhere perfectly to daily regimen for it to work," said Dr. Grant, who is also a professor at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), with which Gladstone is affiliated. "This new study suggests that Truvada can help block the virus even if the person on a daily regimen doesn't always adhere perfectly."

Perfect adherence to drug regimens is notoriously difficult for people to accomplish. But finding out whether patients are taking medications as prescribed is also challenging—they tend to over-report their adherence because they think that is what the clinicians want to hear. So the research team had to find a better way to calculate Truvada's effectiveness while taking into account differing adherence levels.

The team developed a clinical trial in which they gave different amounts of the drug (two, four or seven doses per week) to a cohort of 24 people without HIV. This resulted in different drug concentrations in blood drawn from each participant, thereby mimicking different levels of adherence. They then used a model to compare the drug concentrations in the blood of these participants to the concentrations of original iPrEx study participants in order to determine how well iPrEx participants adhered to the daily regimen, and how well they were protected against HIV at different levels of adherence.

"Surprisingly, we found that the iPrEx participants didn't have to adhere perfectly to the drug regimen to reap Truvada's benefits," said Dr. Grant. "Even in those patients who didn't adhere perfectly, their risk of contracting HIV still dropped by more than 90%—offering a high level of protection against the virus."

Traditionally, adherence to preventative drugs such as Truvada has been measured in qualitative terms, such as "adequate" or "perfect." But this study is the first to establish an objective, quantitative method that estimates drug concentration levels and then correlates those levels with the drug's effectiveness at preventing transmission. These results could open the door to the exploration of ways to optimize dosing—which would make it less costly, more convenient and more adaptable to people's habits.

"Our immediate next step, however, is to take the methods we've developed and create simple yet powerful tools that can measure drug adherence to help doctors monitor how well Truvada is working in their patients," said Dr. Anderson. "Yet until these and other efficacy studies of alternative dosing strategies have been completed, the only regimen that that should be used in clinical practice is the FDA-approved one Truvada each day."

"Patients should still take one pill a day to achieve the best results, and we encourage people to explore multiple methods to prevent HIV—such as regular condom use, early treatment of HIV infection in partners, good communication and male circumcision," Dr. Grant said. "We hope that our findings lead to more effective use of prevention tools that finally squash the HIV/AIDS epidemic."

Journal reference: Science Translational Medicine

Provided by Gladstone Institutes