Medical myth: Reading from a screen harms your eyes

October 19, 2012 by Harrison Weisinger in Health

Medical myth: Reading from a screen harms your eyes

Enlarge

There is simply no evidence to support this old wives tale. Credit: FLICKR/zandwacht

The time most of us spend looking at a screen has rapidly increased over the past decade. If we're not at work on the computer, we're likely to stay tuned into the online sphere via a smart phone or tablet. Shelves of books are being replaced by a single e-book reader; and television shows and movies are available anywhere, any time.

So what does all this extra mean for our eyes?

Well, you'll be pleased to hear that like many good eye myths, there is simply no evidence to support this old wives' tale.

Once we reach the age of ten years or so, it is practically impossible to injure the eyes by looking at something – the exception, of course, being staring at the sun or similarly bright objects. Earlier in life, what we look at – or rather, how clearly we see – can affect our vision because the between the eye and brain are still developing.

When we read off a piece of paper, light from the ambient environment is reflected off the surface of the paper and into our eyes. The at the back of the eye captures the light and begins the process of converting it into a signal that the brain understands.

The process of reading from screens is similar, except that the light is emitted directly by the screen, rather than being reflected.

Some people worry about the "radiation" coming from screens but there's nothing unhealthy about it. The radiation is, for the most part, just , which is why we can see the screen in the first place. Most of the other emissions that lie outside of the are either and unharmful, or absorbed by one of the front few layers of the eye, including the tear film.

Medical myth: Reading from a screen harms your eyes

It’s practically impossible to injure the eyes by looking at something – except for the sun. Credit: Flickr/ZNash

In the past, people used to buy screen covers to dim the light being emitted from their screen. I suspect this did little more that dim the light – causing them to squint and strain. I like bright, shiny screens but the choice between a shiny and matt screen is really only one of personal preference.

Many people complain that prolonged periods looking at a screen gives them headaches and sore eyes. This is perhaps a reflection of the fact that, when looking at a screen and focusing on nearby objects, our eyes are not really doing what they've been designed for. The eye evolved predominantly to be able to look out over fields for potential food or for hungry lions, with the occasional requirement to look at things up close.

We can look up close when the lens inside the eye "accommodates". This requires contraction of muscles inside the eye. When we fixate on a nearby object (say, a screen), we also must turn our eyes inwards. This is called convergence.

With hours on a screen, the muscles of accommodation and convergence can fatigue and give rise to the symptoms we know as eye strain. In my experience, this is one of the most common causes of headache in people who work on screens all day.

This is not to say that screens cause permanent harm – the symptoms should spontaneously resolve when you take a break. Otherwise, spectacles can do a little of the focusing work required to look at a screen.

Many people also report that their eyesight deteriorated shortly after starting a new (screen-based) job. Invariably, this coincides either with an increased reading (papers or a computer screen) or reaching middle age.

Medical myth: Reading from a screen harms your eyes
Enlarge

By our mid-forties, reading up close without glasses may be difficult. Credit: Wiertz SA bastien

From the age of 12 or so, our ability to accommodate is gradually declining as the lens inside the eye stiffens. By the early 40s, accommodation has reduced to the point where reading up close can be problematic. Those stubborn enough to persist eventually present with eyestrain.

The next question about reading from a screen is "does size matter"?

The answer is probably not. If the reader is able to focus on the screen (by accommodating, assisted by the correct spectacle prescription or a combination of the two), then font size won't be an issue. When not impaired by eye disease of optics, the human can resolve right down to phone-book sized letters and smaller.

If anything, the increased brightness of your smart phone or e-book will help you to see the fine print.

I admit that when a friend of mine suggested that I start to read on a tablet, I gave him the oft-heard response, "I prefer the feel of books" or one of its many variants.

But I have since changed my tune, and I confess to being a fully-fledged e-book addict. Not only has buying books become something I can do 24/7, but I can now read in bed without annoying my wife by keeping the light on!

Source: The Conversation search and more info website

This story is published courtesy of the The Conversation (under Creative Commons-Attribution/No derivatives).

4.8 /5 (4 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

robertcollier4
Oct 19, 2012

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
For computer screens - your text should be that which is "lighted up" - thus the background should be black and the text should be white. Then - you are "seeing" the text. instead of staring into a big bulb and seeing outlines.
Tausch
Oct 19, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
That's a lot of ink if this had taken foothold starting with Gutenberg. Appears that practicality entered the picture.
No one objects to blueprints.

Before Gutenberg perhaps Nature played a role - the "big bulb" for humans has always been the Sun for all objects viewed.
Your case in point can be demonstrated with the Rosetta Stone.

Your view is interesting.
Lantern5
Oct 19, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Please, take a look at the following article and comments, is for the welfare of young women in their families: Pap smears to protect against a must cervical cancer
Rank 4.8 /5 (4 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Prenatal exposure to traffic is associated with respiratory infection in young children

Living near a major roadway during the prenatal period is associated with an increased risk of respiratory infection developing in children by the age of 3, according to a new study from researchers in Boston.

Health created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Combined wood and tobacco smoke exposure increases risk and symptoms of COPD

People who are consistently exposed to both wood smoke and tobacco smoke are at a greater risk for developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and for experiencing more frequent and severe symptoms of the disease, ...

Health created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Having a nighttime critical care physician in the ICU doesn't improve patient outcomes, research finds

With little evidence to guide them, many hospital intensive care units (ICUs) have been employing critical care physicians at night with the notion it would improve patients' outcomes. However, new results from a one-year ...

Health created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Study finds air pollution and noise pollution increase cardiovascular risk

Both fine-particle air pollution and noise pollution may increase a person's risk of developing cardiovascular disease, according to German researchers who have conducted a large population study, in which both factors were ...

Health created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Early IV nutrition for certain patients does improve survival or reduce ICU length of stay

The early (within 24 hours of intensive care unit [ICU] admission) provision of intravenous nutrition among critically ill patients with contraindications (a condition that makes a particular procedure potentially inadvisable) ...

Health created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


Do salamanders hold the solution to regeneration?

Salamanders' immune systems are key to their remarkable ability to regrow limbs, and could also underpin their ability to regenerate spinal cords, brain tissue and even parts of their hearts, scientists have ...

Scientists identify molecular trigger for Alzheimer's disease

Researchers have pinpointed a catalytic trigger for the onset of Alzheimer's disease – when the fundamental structure of a protein molecule changes to cause a chain reaction that leads to the death of neurons ...

Study shows premature birth interrupts vital brain development processes leading to reduced cognitive abilities

Researchers from King's College London have for the first time used a novel form of MRI to identify crucial developmental processes in the brain that are vulnerable to the effects of premature birth. This new study, published ...

Leading explanations for whooping cough's resurgence don't stand up to scrutiny

Whooping cough has exploded in the United States and some other developed countries in recent decades, and many experts suspect ineffective childhood vaccines for the alarming resurgence.

CT radiation risk less than risk of examination indicator

(HealthDay)—For young adults needing either a chest or abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT), the short-term risk of death from underlying morbidity is greater than the long-term risk of radiation-induced ...

Music therapy reduces anxiety, use of sedatives for patients receiving ventilator support

New research suggests that for some hospitalized ICU patients on mechanical ventilators, using headphones to listen to their favorite types of music could lower anxiety and reduce their need for sedative medications.