(Medical Xpress)—Naturally, our brain activity waxes and wanes. When listening, this "oscillation" synchronizes to the sounds we are hearing. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute have found that this influences the way we listen. Hearing abilities also "oscillate" and depend on the exact timing of one's brain rhythms. This discovery that sound, brain, and behaviour are so intimately coupled will help us to learn more about listening abilities in hearing loss.
Our world is full of cyclic phenomena: For example, many people experience their attention span changing over the course of a day. Maybe you yourself are more alert in the morning, others more in the afternoon. Bodily functions cyclically change or "oscillate" with environmental rhythms, like light and dark, and this in turn seems to govern our perception and behaviors. One might conclude that we are slaves to our own circadian rhythms, which in turn are slaves to environmental light–dark cycles.
A hard-to-prove idea in neuroscience is that such couplings between rhythms in the environment, rhythms in the brain, and our behaviors are also present at much finer time scales. Molly Henry and Jonas Obleser from the Max Planck Research Group "Auditory Cognition" now followed up on this recurrent idea by investigating the listening brain.
This idea holds fascinating implications for the way humans process speech and music: Imagine the melodic contour of a human voice or your favorite piece of music going up and down. If your brain becomes coupled to, or "entrained" by, these melodic changes, Henry and Obleser reasoned, then you might also be better prepared to expect fleeting but important sounds occurring in what the voice is saying, for example, a "d" versus a "t".
The simple "fleeting sound" in the scientists' experiment was a very short and very hard-to-detect silent gap (about one one-hundredth of a second) embedded in a simplified version of a melodic contour, which slowly and cyclically changed its pitch at a rate of three cycles per second (3 Hz).
To be able to track each listener's brain activity on a millisecond basis, Henry and Obleser recorded the electroencephalographic signal from listeners' scalps. First, the authors demonstrated that every listener's brain was "dragged along" (this is what entrainment, a French word, literally means) by the slow cyclic changes in melody; listeners' neural activity waxed and waned. Second, the listeners' ability to discover the fleeting gaps hidden in the melodic changes was by no means constant over time. Instead, it also "oscillated" and was governed by the brain's waxing and waning. The researchers could predict from a listener's slow brain wave whether or not an upcoming gap would be detected or would slip under the radar.
Why is that? "The slow waxings and wanings of brain activity are called neural oscillations. They regulate our ability to process incoming information", Molly Henry explains. Jonas Obleser adds that "from these findings, an important conclusion emerges: All acoustic fluctuations we encounter appear to shape our brain's activity. Apparently, our brain uses these rhythmic fluctuations to be prepared best for processing important upcoming information".
The researchers hope to be able to use the brain's coupling to its acoustic environment as a new measure to study the problems of listeners with hearing loss or people who stutter.
Explore further:
Noisy surroundings take toll on short-term memory
More information: Henry, M.J. & Obleser, J. (2012). "Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Online: Early Edition (EE), November 12, 2012.

Tausch
not rated yet Nov 14, 2012A good statistical parametric mapping from a (acoustical) approach.
http://en.wikiped..._mapping
Tausch
not rated yet Nov 14, 2012http://phys.org/n...ise.html
Does stochastic resonance have a place in brain activity?
PleonasticAxiom
1 / 5 (1) Nov 14, 2012PleonasticAxiom
not rated yet Nov 14, 2012Does this sound crazy?
Tausch
5 / 5 (1) Nov 15, 2012Stochastic resonances is an off-the-charts, extreme concept.
If noise does not exist, then filters can not form.
cyberCMDR
5 / 5 (2) Nov 17, 2012Tausch
not rated yet Nov 19, 2012The further removed an acoustical event from your 'repertoire' of sounds experienced, the greater the 'difficulty' to assign a 'consensus' meaning to the acoustical event you experience.
A hypothesis.
One can only guess to what aspect of sound you have in mind.
Timbre?
The researchers assert 'the timing'(your expression for temporal aspects of sound) is fundamental to all senses the brain is able to process. Going far beyond the difficulty arising from timbre, assuming timbre is what you meant.
Your word 'associate' is key to assigning meanings to sounds in whatever form we are able to experience them.