Some heart patients may respond differently to anti-platelet drugs

The cause of heart attacks or strokes among some patients treated with anti-platelet drugs may be different than for patients who have undergone surgical procedures to restore blood flow, according to researchers at Duke Medicine.

The finding—reported Nov. 4, 2012, at the 's Scientific Sessions annual meeting and published in the – provides new insights into a subset of with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) whose risk for cardiovascular events remained unchanged despite taking medicine that successfully reduced platelet clotting function.

"Platelet-rich after artherosclerotic plays a major role in the occurrence of ACS events, including heart attack and stroke," said senior author Matthew T. Roe, M.D., MHS, a cardiologist at Duke and member of the Duke Clinical Research Institute. "It seems intuitive that by reducing the clotting tendency with anti-platelet drugs, we would see a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events, but our study shows that for some patients, this may be a more complex interaction."

Roe and colleagues analyzed data from the TRILOGY ACS study, a large international trial that compared two platelet inhibitor drugs called P2Y12 blockers—prasugrel and – together with . Both drugs block an important pathway that leads to the clumping activity of platelets. This pathway is believed to be important in the occurrence of heart attacks in patients who have been treated with cardiac stents.

The main TRILOGY ACS study enrolled more than 9,000 patients with who were treated with medication only instead of receiving such as angioplasty or stenting. The rial showed no significant difference in adverse cardiovascular events between the anti-platelet drugs over 30 months.

More than 2,500 TRILOGY ACS participants took part in a platelet function sub-study, providing blood samples that were analyzed at nine different points over 30 months to determine how the patients' platelet function responded to prasugrel vs. clopidogrel. The periodic blood tests identified a condition known as "high on-treatment platelet reactivity," or HPR. HPR has previously been found in up to half of patients treated with clopidogrel and has been linked to a higher risk of adverse outcomes for patients who undergo coronary stent placement.

Researchers found that a blood test measuring platelet aggregation showed prasugrel was more effective than clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet clotting function and that a smaller percentage of patients treated with prasugrel had HPR. But the researchers did not see a significant difference between the incidence of death, heart attacks or strokes among the study participants, regardless of whether they were taking clopidogrel or prasugrel. And the blood tests, which correlate low scores with more potent platelet inhibition, did not independently identify patients at risk for cardiovascular events.

"We could not show that there was a reliable cut point with this blood test for discriminating between patients who are at risk for an event vs. and those who are not at risk based on platelet aggregation measurements," Roe said. "That's interesting, because previous studies with patients undergoing coronary stent placement have shown that the measurement was independently predictive. It may be that in this population of medically treated ACS patients, the correlation isn't robust and that these patients may respond differently to these types of platelet inhibitors."

Roe said these findings may explain the main outcome of the primary TRILOGY ACS trial, which reported no significant difference between prasugrel and clopidogrel in reducing , especially during the first 12 months.

"The TRILOGY ACS function study is a landmark for many reasons," said Paul A. Gurbel, M.D., director of the Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research at Sinai Hospital of Baltimore and lead author. "It is the largest study of its kind conducted prospectively in a major clinical trial. Whereas data from observational studies in over 20,000 patients treated with stents support a strong and independent relation of HPR to risk for ischemic event occurrence, the same was not observed prospectively in this study of medically treated patients. The reasons for this disparity may be related to the stent implantation itself or other unknown factors. This is an area for future research."

Related Stories

Global platelet reactivity and high risk ACS patients

Aug 28, 2012

Global platelet reactivity is more effective than responsiveness to clopidogrel in identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients at high risk of ischemic events, according to research presented at ESC Congress 2012.

Results of the TRIGGER-PCI trial reported at TCT 2011

Nov 09, 2011

A clinical trial comparing prasugrel to clopidogrel for patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HCPR) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was ended early due to relatively few occurrences of ...

Anti-clotting drugs yield similar results

Aug 26, 2012

The first trial to study patients with acute coronary syndrome who do not undergo coronary stenting or bypass surgery found no significant difference between two anti-clotting drugs – prasugrel and clopidogrel – in preventing ...

Recommended for you

Most seniors eligible for statin Rx under new guidelines

Nov 25, 2014

(HealthDay)—Most older Americans qualify for treatment with statins under new guidelines for the treatment of blood cholesterol released late last year by the American College of Cardiology and the American ...

Asymptomatic atherosclerosis linked to cognitive impairment

Nov 25, 2014

In a study of nearly 2,000 adults, researchers found that a buildup of plaque in the body's major arteries was associated with mild cognitive impairment. Results of the study conducted at the University of Texas (UT) Southwestern ...

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.