Dopamine not about pleasure (anymore)

by Christine Buckley
John Salamone, professor of psychology, at his office.

(Medical Xpress)—To John Salamone, professor of psychology and longtime researcher of the brain chemical dopamine, scientific research can be very slow-moving.

"It takes a long time for things to change in science," he says. "It's like pulling on the of an ocean liner, then waiting for the huge ship to slowly turn."

Salamone has spent most of his career battling a particular long-held scientific idea: the popular notion that high levels of brain dopamine are related to experiences of . As increasing numbers of studies show, he says, the famous is not responsible for pleasure, but has to do with motivation.

He summarizes and comments on the evidence for this shift in thinking in a Nov. 8 review in the Cell Press journal Neuron.

In the early 1980's, explains Salamone, the National Institute on Drug Abuse put out a call for research on the for drug abuse and .

The research that ensued built support for the idea that when the brain produced elevated amounts of dopamine, it was accompanied by perceptions of pleasure. The chemical quickly became known for this relationship, which was thought to be important for responding to drugs and other motivational substances, such as food.

The chemical, which was formerly only thought to play a small role in movement, became over the subsequent decades among the most well-known and important in the brain. It turned out to be so important that it found its way into , with dozens of self-help books and websites explaining its relationship to feelings of happiness and reward.

But over time, Salamone's studies and those of others started revealing problems. In animals, can spike after stress, such as losing a fight with another animal. Soldiers dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder also show activity in dopamine-rich when hearing recorded gunshots and other combat sounds.

So if dopamine was really the pleasure element, then why all this association with negative experiences?

Salamone's research over the past 15 years has attempted to find an answer to that question. His work involves artificially raising or lowering dopamine levels in animals, then giving them a choice between two rewards with different value, which can be obtained through different amounts of work.

For example, what will a rat do when on one end of a corridor there's a pile of food, but on the other end there's a pile of food twice as big with a small fence to jump over on the way?

As Salamone's studies have showed, animals with lowered levels of dopamine almost always choose the easy, low-value reward, while animals with normal levels don't mind exerting the effort to jump the fence for the high-value reward.

Other studies in humans have corroborated these results, such as research with depressed patients.

"Often, depressed people say they don't want to go out with their friends," says Salamone. But it's not that they don't experience pleasure, he says – if their friends were around, many depressed people could have fun.

"Low levels of dopamine make people and other animals less likely to work for things, so it has more to do with motivation and cost/benefit analyses than pleasure itself," he explains.

In essence, says Salamone, this is how amphetamines work, which increase dopamine levels and help people motivate to focus on tasks at hand.

"When you give people amphetamines, you see them putting more effort into things," he says.

The big implications of this change in understanding come at the level of overlapping motivational symptoms of depression with those seen in other disorders such as schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease. Symptoms of fatigue may be related to low levels of dopamine or changes in other parts of the same brain circuitry.

On the one hand, this lack of perceived energy is maladaptive, because it reduces the tendency to interact with the environment. But, Salamone says, it could also reflect the body's attempt to save energy in a crisis.

He points out that new ideas in science are traditionally met with criticism. But after all the mounting evidence, he says he's no longer regarded as "a crazy rebel," but simply someone who thought differently.

"Science is not a collection of facts. It's a process," he says. "First we thought dopamine was involved only in movement. Then that faded and we thought it was pleasure. Now we've gone beyond that data on pleasure."

Although he has thought about writing a popular-press book, he's not sure he really wants to go to the public and "debunk" the dopamine hypothesis of pleasure and reward. But if he ever does, one thing is for sure.

"I can sum up all this work with one phrase, which would make a great book title," he says. ": it's not about pleasure anymore."

Related Stories

Gene therapy reduces cocaine use in rats

Apr 16, 2008

Researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory have shown that increasing the brain level of receptors for dopamine, a pleasure-related chemical, can reduce use of cocaine by 75 percent in rats ...

Receptor limits the rewarding effects of food and cocaine

Jul 12, 2011

(Medical Xpress) -- Researchers have long known that dopamine, a brain chemical that plays important roles in the control of normal movement, and in pleasure, reward and motivation, also plays a central role in substance ...

Obesity predisposition traced to the brain's reward system

Jul 29, 2008

The tendency toward obesity is directly related to the brain system that is involved in food reward and addictive behaviors, according to a new study. Researchers at Tufts University School of Medicine (TUSM) and colleagues ...

Recommended for you

Turning off depression in the brain

6 hours ago

Scientists have traced vulnerability to depression-like behaviors in mice to out-of-balance electrical activity inside neurons of the brain's reward circuit and experimentally reversed it – but there's ...

Rapid whole-brain imaging with single cell resolution

7 hours ago

A major challenge of systems biology is understanding how phenomena at the cellular scale correlate with activity at the organism level. A concerted effort has been made especially in the brain, as scientists are aiming to ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Tausch
5 / 5 (1) Dec 03, 2012
Constructive criticism is a process. A process is always necessary.
Always insufficient. Always incomplete.
Science is never-ending.

The source of association is existence.
Only then can you imagine you never were.
Finding no evidence is not evidence of (non)existence.

Write your book. It's a process.