Study calls for reform of laws on the use and destruction of IVF embryos

Study calls for reform of laws on the use and destruction of IVF embryos
UTS researchers claim more support is needed for IVF participants.

UTS Law researchers this week released a report that shows a more flexible and responsive approach is required to support IVF participants to make their own decisions about frozen embryos.

More than 120,000 are now in storage across Australia. While most will be used in future , many will never be needed, leading to difficult choices for parents, according to the research.

The report by Professors Jenni Millbank, Anita Stuhmcke and Isabel Karpin draws on the experience of over 400 past and present IVF patients in over twenty clinical sites across Australia, spanning two decades of experiences.

Patients are confused by overlapping and complicated rules concerning the use or destruction of frozen embryos held in storage after IVF.

"Current rules around stored IVF embryos are intrusive and disrespectful," Professor Millbank said.

"Law should not set blanket storage periods that enforce destruction of embryos after a set period; nor should it prevent donation if that is desired."

Professor Anita Stuhmcke said she believed patients need to receive better information and more options prior to engaging in treatment and be supported in making their own informed choices.

"Policies and practices in modern day IVF must acknowledge the emotional significance of embryos, particularly to the women who underwent painful and to create them" Professor Karpin said.

The report identified 57 recommendations for changes to law, policy and practice in this area, covering matters such as storage limits, use after the death of a partner and embryo donation for reproduction.

Key Recommendations include:

  • A clear 'ready reckoner' outlining options on the storage and disposition of embryos, accompanied by explanations of their legal effect
  • Standard 'exit counselling' at the end of IVF or time of family completion
  • On death, decisions on embryos rest with the surviving partner
  • Accessible external dispute resolution body and appeals process
  • No compelled destruction of embryos, including as a result of storage limits
  • Patients should decide the manner of destruction of their , including, but not limited to, taking them home for their own form of disposal
  • Greater support for embryo donation for reproduction

More information: To access the full list of key recommendations, as well as fact sheets and case studies, visit allabouttheembryo.net .

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Solution to spare embryos

May 17, 2012

An overwhelming majority of South Australians would rather see spare embryos used and not discarded, a Flinders University study has found.

Recommended for you

Prolonged, heavy bleeding during menopause is common

11 hours ago

Women going through menopause most likely think of it as the time for an end to predictable monthly periods. Researchers at the University of Michigan say it's normal, however, for the majority of them to experience an increase ...

Italy IVF patient pregnant with wrong embryos

Apr 13, 2014

A woman who underwent fertility treatment at a clinic in Rome became pregnant with the twins of another couple after their embryos were mixed up, press reports said Sunday.

Abuse not tied to pain severity in chronic pelvic pain

Apr 11, 2014

(HealthDay)—A history of adolescent or adult abuse is not associated with pain severity, but is linked to pain-related disability and depression in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP), according to a study ...

User comments