Restrictive transfusion strategy safe for acute GI bleeding

Restrictive transfusion strategy safe for acute GI bleeding
For patients with severe acute gastrointestinal bleeding, a restrictive transfusion approach is safe and effective compared with a liberal approach, according to a study published in the Jan. 2 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

(HealthDay)—For patients with severe acute gastrointestinal bleeding, a restrictive transfusion approach is safe and effective compared with a liberal approach, according to a study published in the Jan. 2 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Càndid Villanueva, M.D., from the Hospital de Sant Pau in Barcelona, Spain, and colleagues conducted a to compare the efficacy and safety of a restrictive transfusion strategy (461 patients; transfusion when hemoglobin level fell below 7 g/dL) with a liberal transfusion strategy (460 patients; transfusion when fell below 9 g/dL) for severe acute .

The researchers found that 51 percent in the restrictive-strategy group and 15 percent in the liberal-strategy group did not receive a transfusion (P < 0.001). In the restrictive-strategy group, the probability of survival at six weeks was significantly higher (95 versus 91 percent; hazard ratio for death with restrictive strategy, 0.55). Further bleeding and adverse events occurred in significantly fewer patients in the restrictive-strategy group versus the liberal-strategy group (10 versus 16 percent and 40 versus 48 percent, respectively). For patients who had bleeding associated with a peptic ulcer, the probability of survival was non-significantly increased in the restrictive-strategy group. For patients assigned to the liberal-strategy group, but not the restrictive-strategy, portal-pressure gradient increased significantly within the first five days.

"Our results suggest that, in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding, a strategy of not performing transfusion until the falls below 7 g per deciliter is a safe and effective approach," the authors write.

One author disclosed a financial tie to Sequana Medical.

More information: Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Related Stories

AABB releases new guidelines for red blood cell transfusion

date Mar 26, 2012

AABB (formerly known as the American Association of Blood Banks) recommends a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy for stable adults and children, according to new guidelines being published in Annals of Internal Me ...

Recommended for you

Score IDs patients with upper extremity DVT at low risk

date 56 minutes ago

(HealthDay)—For patients with upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), six easily available factors can be used to create a score that identifies those at low risk of adverse events during the first ...

Combined drug treatment combats kidney disease

date 11 hours ago

A recent discovery by drug researchers whereby coupling specific cell membrane receptors has altered kidney cell function has triggered a re-think of how to treat chronic kidney disease (CKD) more effectively.

Active substance targeting dreaded hospital germs

date 11 hours ago

In the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), scientists have conducted clinical studies on an active substance against the dreaded hospital pathogen Staphylococcus aureus: a highly effective protein from bacteriophages ...

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.