Scientific breakthrough reveals secret to successful exercise programmes

Scientific breakthrough reveals secret to successful exercise programmes
Cyclists during the trial which identifies an optimum athletic training intensity.

Do you feel like exercise just leaves you fatigued without any real improvements? A study of cyclists by scientists at the University of Stirling has uncovered the secret to successful training, a discovery which could help us all lead healthier lives.

Health and Exercise scientists from Scotland's University for Sporting Excellence put 12 cyclists through their paces during a 29-week trial to determine optimum intensity.

"Quantity and quality of training has provided a quandary for coaches and athletes for many years, but this study is the first of its kind to provide an answer to the problem," explained Dr Stuart Galloway, who led the study.

Split into two groups, six cyclists completed a block of 80% low and 20% whilst the second group pedalled at 55% low and 45% moderate intensity.

After a four week , the groups then switched over and the results showed the block combining high and low intensity exercise sessions increased both power and performance twice as much as the block with low and moderate intensity training.

Dr Galloway added: "It is a case of training smarter. We found in these that if you can make the hard sessions harder and the easy sessions easier then you will likely see better progress. tend to spend a lot of their training in a bracket which in our study showed much smaller improvements.

"For the wider public, most people were advised to do moderate-level for around three hours a week then more recently, high intensity bouts of exercise such as spin cycling classes or interval running have been presented as the best option. We would suggest that while high intensity is still important, it's the combination with low intensity which has the biggest impact."

This combination is also beneficial when it comes to aiding recovery, a vital component in improving physical health.

Dr Angus Hunter, senior lecturer in exercise physiology and co-author on the study, said: "Muscle fatigue can be detrimental to a successful long-term programme, but our study suggests that a much quicker recovery occurs when adopting the low and high intensity combination. Your muscles may be fatigued more quickly when you work at a high intensity, but they recover more quickly too.

"We understand that for an athlete, their training intensity will vary depending on whether they are building towards a competition or in the off-season, but this study offers a good model to enable you to hit your peak."

The full study, completed in partnership with colleagues at University College Dublin, can be viewed in the Journal of Applied Physiology.

Related Stories

Building muscle without heavy weights

Apr 26, 2012

Weight training at a lower intensity but with more repetitions may be as effective for building muscle as lifting heavy weights says a new opinion piece in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism.

Recommended for you

Report highlights progress, challenges in health IT

13 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Progress has been made toward widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), although there are still barriers to adoption of advanced use of EHRs, according to a report published ...

Training your brain to prefer healthy foods

13 hours ago

It may be possible to train the brain to prefer healthy low-calorie foods over unhealthy higher-calorie foods, according to new research by scientists at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center ...

Outdoor enthusiasts need a lightning plan

14 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Those partaking in outdoor sports and activities need to be aware of the threat posed by lightning and take appropriate safety measures, experts say.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

nanotech_republika_pl
not rated yet Jan 18, 2013
So they showed that high intensity is more beneficial to make improvements than low intensity exercise, but I don't think they showed that low intensity training during recovery is better than no training during recovery. Did they?
Kron
5 / 5 (1) Jan 19, 2013
A 20 minute low-intensity run with 10 full-speed sprints ('til exhaustion) - is better for you than - a 20 minute run with 10 minutes low-intensity and 10 minutes moderate-intensity running ('til exhaustion).
So they showed that high intensity is more beneficial to make improvements than low intensity exercise,

No. They showed that high intensity mixed with low intensity IS BETTER THAN moderate intensity mixed with low intensity. If you take running for an example the study shows that: a low speed run with sprints thrown in IS BETTER THAN a low speed run with moderate speed running thrown in.
but I don't think they showed that low intensity training during recovery is better than no training during recovery. Did they?

For cardiovascular benefits the key is to keep the heart-rate up.

Sprinting, jogging, sprinting, jogging... keeps the heart-rate elevated..

Sprinting, stopping, sprinting, stopping... allows heart-rate to fall to rest.