The party in your brain

A team of political scientists and neuroscientists has shown that liberals and conservatives use different parts of the brain when they make risky decisions, and these regions can be used to predict which political party a person prefers. The new study suggests that while genetics or parental influence may play a significant role, being a Republican or Democrat changes how the brain functions.

Dr. Darren Schreiber, a researcher in neuropolitics at the University of Exeter, has been working in collaboration with colleagues at the University of California, San Diego on research that explores the differences in the way the brain functions in American liberals and conservatives. The findings are published in the journal on 13 February.

In a prior experiment, participants had their brain activity measured as they played a simple gambling game. Dr. Schreiber and his UC San Diego collaborators were able to look up the political party registration of the participants in public records. Using this new analysis of 82 people who performed the gambling task, the academics showed that Republicans and Democrats do not differ in the risks they take. However, there were striking differences in the participants' brain activity during the risk-taking task.

Democrats showed significantly greater activity in the left insula, a region associated with social and self-awareness. Meanwhile Republicans showed significantly greater activity in the right amygdala, a region involved in the body's fight-or-flight system. These results suggest that liberals and conservatives engage different when they think about risk.

In fact, brain activity in these two regions alone can be used to predict whether a person is a Democrat or Republican with 82.9% accuracy. By comparison, the longstanding traditional model in political science, which uses the party affiliation of a person's mother and father to predict the child's affiliation, is only accurate about 69.5% of the time. And another model based on the differences in brain structure distinguishes liberals from conservatives with only 71.6% accuracy.

The model also outperforms models based on differences in genes. Dr. Schreiber said: "Although genetics have been shown to contribute to differences in political ideology and strength of party politics, the portion of variation in political affiliation explained by activity in the amygdala and insula is significantly larger, suggesting that affiliating with a political party and engaging in a partisan environment may alter the brain, above and beyond the effect of heredity."

These results may pave the way for new research on voter behaviour, yielding better understanding of the differences in how liberals and conservatives think. According to Dr. Schreiber: "The ability to accurately predict party politics using only while gambling suggests that investigating basic neural differences between voters may provide us with more powerful insights than the traditional tools of political science."

Related Stories

Political views are reflected in brain structure

Apr 07, 2011

We all know that people at opposite ends of the political spectrum often really can't see eye to eye. Now, a new report published online on April 7th in Current Biology reveals that those differences in political orientation are ti ...

Recommended for you

Damage to brain networks affects stroke recovery

6 hours ago

(Medical Xpress)—Initial results of an innovative study may significantly change how some patients are evaluated after a stroke, according to researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. ...

Dopamine leaves its mark in brain scans

6 hours ago

Researchers use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify which areas of the brain are active during specific tasks. The method reveals areas of the brain, in which energy use and hence oxygen ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dr_talal
not rated yet Feb 14, 2013
So may be they want now to control voter behavior by some way that they can let them voite for who they want to win , amazing .
vlaaing peerd
not rated yet Feb 14, 2013
hmm, from a foreigner pov, both parties are considered conservative, how could this almost indistinguishable difference in political choice cause such effects in the brain?

Have the americans become so polarised in this that the "either with us or against us" is causing a new north and south?

Allow me to explain, over here we have a multitude of different political parties: liberals, democrats, religous democrats, religious conservatives, socialists, communists, xenofobes, greenies, elderly representatives and in all sorts of combinations.

Over time the political landscape changes and it's not uncommon for parties to gradually shift their views or dissolve in other parties, neither is it uncommon for voters to regularly change their vote to different parties, depending on how their situation at that moment in their lives is.

So, political views might not be so hardwired in the brain since we're less "fixed" unto a political view. If there's any generalistation I could make...
vlaaing peerd
not rated yet Feb 14, 2013
...it would probably be that the young and very old tend to lean over to more progressive views and the middle aged towards a more conservative view. This (mere personal observation) however doesn't correspond to the resulst in this article.

All in all it's very interesting that a 2-party system could influence a persons brainwiring and therefore probably will effect sociological and cultural behaviour as well.

Which makes me wonder if a 2 party system would cause a more polarised, black and white view on life vs the messy landscape we have here?

Time to bring this research over to Europe I say :)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.