Researchers show that suppressing the brain's 'filter' can improve performance in creative tasks

Researchers place the electrodes of this tDCS system so that the current passes through the area of the brain being studied.

(Medical Xpress)—The brain's prefrontal cortex is thought to be the seat of cognitive control, working as a kind of filter that keeps irrelevant thoughts, perceptions and memories from interfering with a task at hand.

Now, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have shown that inhibiting this filter can boost performance for tasks in which unfiltered, creative thoughts present an advantage.

Their work was published in the journal Cognitive Neuroscience.

Previous studies have shown that the prefrontal cortex—in particular, the left prefrontal cortex—is one important area of the brain that supports cognitive control. As a test of whether reduced cognitive control might be advantageous in some circumstances, Thompson-Schill's team designed an experiment that involved inhibiting the activity of the left prefrontal cortex in adults while they completed a creative task.

In this task, participants are shown pictures of everyday objects and are asked to quickly come up with uses for them that are out of the ordinary, such as using a baseball bat as a rolling pin. Participants see a sequence of 60 objects, one every nine seconds, and the researchers measure how long it takes for them to come up with a valid response, or if they are unable to do so before the next picture appears.

The researchers hypothesized that high levels of cognitive control would be a detriment to coming up with these kinds of uncommon uses.

"When we use objects in daily life, our cognitive control helps us focus on what the object is typically used for and 'filters out' irrelevant properties," Chrysikou said. "However, to come up with the idea of using a as a rolling pin, you have to consider things like its shape and the material it's made of."

"The real takeaway," Thompson-Schill said, "is that when you give people a task for which they do not know the goal—such as showing them an object and asking, 'What else can you do with this thing'—anything that they would normally do to filter out irrelevant information about the object will hurt their ability to do the task."

An example of the kind of images particpants saw, along with an example of a valid response for an uncommon use.

Experiments to test such hypotheses have been aided by new ways of non-invasively manipulating neurons in specific areas of the brain, inducing a variety of temporary changes in and performance.

The method Thompson-Schill's team used, called transcranial direct current stimulation, or tDCS, involves passing a weak electrical charge through the brain, aiming the charge's path so it intersects with areas thought to be associated with an ability or behavior. This charge can influence the electrical activity that constitutes cell-to-cell communication in those areas.

"TDCS is believed to induce incremental shifts in the electrical potential of neuronal membranes, making it more or less likely that neurons will reach their threshold for firing," Hamilton said. "In this instance, we employed stimulation in a way that would make it harder for neurons to fire, thereby diminishing behaviorally relevant activity in that part of the ."

Participants were first split into groups corresponding to three experimental conditions: one would receive tDCS to their left prefrontal cortex for the duration of the task, another would receive it to their right prefrontal cortex and a third would receive what amounted to a placebo. TDCS produces a slight tingling sensation on the scalp when it is first applied, so those in the third group received only a brief period of stimulation before the task began, rather than throughout.

As additional controls, each of these three groups was also split in half, with one set completing the uncommon-use task and the other simply stating what the object is normally used for. And all participants also completed a task that involved remembering strings of numbers, a common exercise in psychological experiments that has been shown not to require the prefrontal cortex.

"We wouldn't want to think that the stimulation affected everything," Thompson-Schill said. "So if we found an effect when participants were remembering numbers, we'd be worried about our interpretation of the data."

As expected, none of the experimental conditions affected ' performance when asked to recall the sequences of numbers, or when they were asked to say the common uses of the objects they saw. But there was a marked difference between those who received tDCS to their left prefrontal cortex and those who didn't when completing the uncommon-use task.

The right prefrontal cortex and placebo groups couldn't come up with uncommon uses for an average of 15 out of 60 objects, whereas those whose left prefrontal cortices were being inhibited only missed an average of eight.

The latter group was also able to provide correct responses an average of a second faster than the former two.

"A second faster difference is huge in psychology research. We're used to seeing differences measured in milliseconds," Thompson-Schill said. This is probably the biggest effect I've seen over my 20 years in research."

These results lend credence to the idea that high levels of may be a disadvantage in some circumstances, such as in early development.

"We differ from non-human primates in having a long period of immaturity in our prefrontal cortex," Thompson-Schill said, "so we started considering whether this might not be an unfortunate accident of nature but rather a feature of our species' developmental path.

The slow development of the is one reason children fail at many attention-based tasks but excel at imaginative ones. It may also aid children in rapidly acquiring new knowledge.

"There are things that are important to not filter, in particular when you are learning," Thompson-Schill said. "If you throw out information about your environment as being irrelevant, you miss opportunities to learn about those things."

More information: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/1… 17588928.2013.768221

Related Stories

Cognition Without Control

Feb 24, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Kids' inability to filter out distractions is a good thing. In fact, it's precisely what makes them such prodigious learners of language.

How the brain copes with multi tasking alters with age

Jan 17, 2013

The pattern of blood flow in the prefrontal cortex in the brains alters with age during multi-tasking, finds a new study in BioMed Central's open access journal BMC Neuroscience. Increased blood volume, measured using oxygen ...

Recommended for you

'Dimmer switch' for mood disorders discovered

5 hours ago

Researchers at University of California, San Diego School of Medicine have identified a control mechanism for an area of the brain that processes sensory and emotive information that humans experience as ...

How stress tears us apart

14 hours ago

Why is it that when people are too stressed they are often grouchy, grumpy, nasty, distracted or forgetful? Researchers from the Brain Mind Institute (BMI) at EPFL have just highlighted a fundamental synaptic ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

NikFromNYC
2.3 / 5 (6) Mar 14, 2013
Wine works too.
mooika
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 15, 2013
Sounds like an effort to "induce" the brain function of an ADHD brain. Creativity and quick learning or making associations has never been a problem for me. But do not ask me to pay bills or be on time. Is it possible for this testing to allow non ADHD subjects experience what our days are like....and while they are now "free" to experience creative thoughts, experiment and see if their executive function and control has been comprimised.
ormondotvos
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 15, 2013
It was obvious in the Sixties that LSD was a disinhibitor. PCP is way too crude.
Sinister1811
2 / 5 (4) Mar 15, 2013
I do agree that certain illicit drugs, or alcohol, could provide a similar effect.
arq
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 15, 2013
I have this problem or capability depending on whether you see it as one or the other. I consider myself creative and i have mild ADD......my mind gets distracted a lot from the mental task at hand.
Midcliff
1 / 5 (1) Mar 15, 2013
So it may be true that marijuana inspires creativity.