Implanted device predicts epilepsy seizures in humans

May 1, 2013

For the first time, a small device implanted in the brain has accurately predicted the onset of seizures in some adults who have epilepsy that doesn't respond to drugs, according to a small proof-of-concept study published Online First in The Lancet Neurology.

"Knowing when a seizure might happen could dramatically improve the quality of life and independence of people with epilepsy and potentially allow them to avoid such as driving or swimming, or to take drugs to stop before they start, rather than continuously as at present", explains lead author Mark Cook from the University of Melbourne in Australia.

The technology, developed by NeuroVista, is designed to detect in the brain that precedes a seizure using electrodes implanted between the skull and which constantly monitor electrical activity (electroencephalography; EEG) data. The are connected to a second device implanted under the skin of the chest which transmits this information wirelessly to a hand-held device that calculates the probability of a seizure. Three coloured lights warn patients of the high (red), moderate (white), or low (blue) risk of an impending seizure.

More than 60 million people worldwide have epilepsy, 30–40% of these patients are unable get their seizures under control with existing treatments.

The Australian feasibility study included 15 people with aged 20–62 years who experienced between two and 12 seizures per month and had not had their seizures controlled despite use of at least two anti-epileptic drugs.

During the first month after , the system was set for detection only while EEG data containing a minimum of five seizures was collected and analysed to construct an individualised algorithm of seizure likelihood.

The researchers measured the system's performance, , and safety for 4 months after implant and 4 months following activation.

During the initial data collection, the system correctly predicted seizures with a "high warning" sensitivity greater than 65%, and worked to a level better than chance, in 11 of the 15 adults. In eight of the 11 patients who went on to have the device activated and to use the system for 4 months, sensitivity ranged from 56% to 100%.

The technology appears to be relatively safe, with a similar safety profile to other implanted devices such as deep brain stimulators for Parkinson's disease. Three patients experienced serious device-related adverse events, with two requiring the device to be removed.

Strikingly, the study also revealed substantial disparities between reported and detected events, with most participants greatly underestimating the number of their seizures. For example, one patient who reported having 11 seizures per month actually had 102. "Our findings have pronounced implications for trials of new epilepsy treatments which often rely on patient-reported events as the primary efficacy endpoint", write the authors.

Cook is optimistic that if the findings are replicated in larger, longer studies, this technology will improve management strategies including developing methods of preventing seizures using direct electrical stimulation or fast-acting drug therapies.

Writing in a linked Comment, Christian Elger and Florian Mormann from the University of Bonn Medical Centre in Germany say, "[These results] are a major milestone in epileptology [the study of epilepsy], showing for the first time (to our knowledge) that prospective seizure prediction is possible…[but] whether this performance is also sufficient for clinical application is unclear; this will depend on how well patients tolerate false alarms or missed seizures, and will ultimately need to be decided on an individual basis. Nevertheless, the presented results suggest that at least some patients would view the warning device as beneficial."

More information: www.thelancet.com/journals/lanneurol/article/PIIS1474-442(13)70075-9/abstract

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Surprising similarity in fly and mouse motion vision

July 29, 2015

At first glance, the eyes of mammals and those of insects do not seem to have much in common. However, a comparison of the neural circuits for detecting motion shows surprising parallels between flies and mice. Scientists ...

Research grasps how the brain plans gripping motion

July 28, 2015

With the results of a new study, neuroscientists have a firmer grasp on the way the brain formulates commands for the hand to grip an object. The advance could lead to improvements in future brain-computer interfaces that ...

New research rethinks how we grab and hold onto objects

July 28, 2015

It's been a long day. You open your fridge and grab a nice, cold beer. A pretty simple task, right? Wrong. While you're debating between an IPA and a lager, your nervous system is calculating a complex problem: how hard to ...

It don't mean a thing if the brain ain't got that swing

July 27, 2015

Like Duke Ellington's 1931 jazz standard, the human brain improvises while its rhythm section keeps up a steady beat. But when it comes to taking on intellectually challenging tasks, groups of neurons tune in to one another ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.