Elderly benefit from using implantable defibrillators

This infographic from the article outlines the elderly may benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillators as much as younger people. Credit: American Heart Association journal Circulation; D. Lee

The elderly may benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillators as much as younger people, according to new research in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.

An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a small battery-powered device placed under the skin of the chest which delivers to restore a normal heartbeat if it detects a dangerous abnormal rhythm.

Overall health—not age alone—should determine how well patients will do after getting an ICD and help guide decisions about who should receive one, researchers said.

"Whether elderly patients benefit from the devices has been controversial and research on the topic is lacking," said Douglas S. Lee, M.D., Ph.D., lead author and scientist at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and cardiologist at the Peter Munk Cardiac Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. "The issue is important as the population ages and the number of elderly people living with heart disease grows."

Researchers studied 5,399 patients who had ICDs implanted because of poor due to a prior heart attack or , or after being resuscitated from .

"Older patients were just as likely to experience an appropriate from the device to treat a life-threatening heart rhythm. However, older patients experienced more non-cardiac and cardiovascular hospitalizations and higher associated rates of death overall," said Lee, who is also associate professor of medicine at the University of Toronto.

Other study findings include:

  • Among those who received an ICD with heart failure or after heart attack, 38.5 percent were 70 years or older and 7 percent were 80 years or older.
  • Among those who received an ICD after surviving a cardiac arrest, 42.5 percent were 70 years or older and 10.9 percent were in their 80s.
  • Older age correlated with increased risk of death after ICD implantation in both groups. For example, among those undergoing ICD implantation for prevention of cardiac arrest, 2 in every 100 patients ages 18-49 died whereas 10 in 100 died among those 80 years and older.
  • Use of the devices was equally effective among younger and older patients in restoring heart rhythm after a serious life-threatening rhythm disorder occurred. Across all age groups, ICDs more often delivered appropriate electrical shocks when implanted after cardiac arrest than when used to prevent the first cardiac arrest.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Dual chamber defibrillators pose higher risk of complications

May 14, 2013

A device commonly used to treat dangerous heart rhythms may cause more issues for patients than a simpler version of the same device. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) prevents sudden cardiac death by detecting ...

Recommended for you

Gene variant raises risk for aortic tear and rupture

Apr 17, 2014

Researchers from Yale School of Medicine and Celera Diagnostics have confirmed the significance of a genetic variant that substantially increases the risk of a frequently fatal thoracic aortic dissection or full rupture. ...

Considerable variation in CT use in ischemic stroke

Apr 17, 2014

(HealthDay)—For patients with ischemic stroke there is considerable variation in the rates of high-intensity computed tomography (CT) use, according to a study published online April 8 in Circulation: Ca ...

Beating the clock for ischemic stroke sufferers

Apr 17, 2014

A ground-breaking computer technology raises hope for people struck by ischemic stroke, which is a very common kind of stroke accounting for over 80 per cent of overall stroke cases. Developed by research experts at The Hong ...

User comments