How foods are 'sized' affects how much we eat

How foods are 'sized' affects how much we eat
David Just, left, and Brian Wansink have co-authored a study that shows that whether foods are labeled small, regular or double-sized influences how much people will consume – and how much they'll pay for them. Credit: Robyn Wishna

(Medical Xpress)—Portions, such as 8, 12 or 16 ounces – are given different labels – small, medium or large – at different restaurants.

However, how a portion is described size-wise impacts how much we eat and how much we're willing to pay for our , reports a new study from Cornell published online June 13 in the journal Health Economics.

The research shows that consumers use such labels to dictate how much food they think is a "normal" portion, and then adjust their intake accordingly. "People are willing to pay more for a portion that sounds larger, but they also are apt to eat more of an enormous portion if they believe it is 'regular' to do so," said David R. Just, associate professor at Cornell's Dyson School of . Just conducted the study with Brian Wansink, the John S. Dyson Professor of Marketing at Cornell. Both are affiliated with the Cornell Food and Brand Lab.

In their study, the researchers served either one or two cups of spaghetti, for example. For some participants, the small and large portions were labeled "half-size" and "regular," respectively, giving the impression that the larger two-cup portion was the norm. For other participants, the same portions were labeled "regular" and "double-size" – implying that the smaller one-cup portion was the norm.

"These varying concepts of 'regular' made all the difference in how much people would spend and subsequently eat," said Just. "Participants ate much more when their portion was labeled "regular" than when it was labeled "double-size." In fact, participants who thought their portion was "double-size" left 10 times the food on their plate."

Exploring how portion labels impact the willingness of patrons to pay, the researchers let participants bid on each portion. When the portion was labeled "half-size," participants were willing to pay only half when the same portion was labeled "regular." The labels, rather than the visual appearance of each serving, acted as indicators.

"The huge impact of size labels suggests that both and producers could benefit from standardization of food size-labeling," said Wansink. "Clearly defining the actual amount of food in a 'small' or a 'large' would inform customers of just how much food they are ordering every time they ask for a certain size. Until then, take the time to think about what portion you're really getting when you order your standard 'medium' meal."

The study, "One Man's Tall is Another Man's Small: How the Framing of Portion Size Influences Food Choice," was funded by the Cornell Food and Brand Lab.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Impact of portion size on overeating is hard to overcome

Apr 16, 2013

People given large servings of food eat more than those given smaller servings, even after they have been taught about the impact of portion size on consumption, research from the University of New South Wales shows.

Recommended for you

Mums trust mums on the net, according to study

6 minutes ago

Facebook groups for mothers are overtaking the traditional mums-and-bubs and playgroup environments as a source of trusted advice, and offers a largely untapped marketing tool for businesses wanting to sell ...

Social networks key to improving health in New Zealand

26 minutes ago

Turning conventional thinking about health and healthcare on its head by championing social networks is vital if New Zealanders want to improve their health outcomes, and ultimately save the nation money, says a leading public ...

User comments