Severe maternal complications less common during home births

June 13, 2013

Women with low risk pregnancies who choose to give birth at home have a lower risk of severe complications than women who plan a hospital birth, finds a study published in BMJ today.

However, the authors stress that the overall risk of severe problems is small and the results are significant only for who have previously given birth – not for first-time mums.

The relative safety of planned home births is a topic of continuous debate, but studies have so far been too small to compare severe between planned home and planned hospital birth among low risk women.

Of all Western countries, the Netherlands has the highest percentage of home births, assisted by a primary care midwife.

So a team of Dutch researchers decided to test whether low risk women at the onset of labour with planned home birth have a higher rate of rare but severe outcomes (known as severe acute maternal morbidity or SAMM) than those with planned hospital births.

This was defined as admission to an , , eclampsia or major obstetric haemorrhage (requiring a large ). Other adverse complications included postpartum haemorrhage (severe loss of blood after delivery) and manual removal of the placenta.

Using data from a national study into maternal morbidity and national birth registry data from 1 August 2004 to 1 August 2006, they identified over 146,000 low risk women in primary care at the onset of labour.

Results were adjusted for several factors including , , ethnic background and socioeconomic status.

Of the 146,752 women included in the study, 92,333 (63%) had a planned home birth and 54,419 (37%) a planned hospital birth.

For women having their first baby (nulliparous women), the rate of severe outcomes for a planned home birth was 2.3 per 1000 compared with 3.1 per 1000 for a planned hospital birth. The rate of postpartum haemorrhage was 43.1 per 1000 for a planned home compared with 43.3 per 1000 for a planned hospital birth.

For women who had previously given birth (parous women), the rate of severe outcomes for a planned home birth was 1 per 1000 compared with 2.3 per 1000 for a planned hospital birth. The rate of postpartum haemorrhage was 19.6 per 1000 for a planned home compared with 37.6 per 1000 for a planned hospital birth.

Adverse outcomes were less common among planned home births than among planned hospital births but differences were only statistically significant for women who had previously given .

The researchers emphasise that their findings may only apply to regions where midwives are well trained to assist women at home births and where facilities for transfer of care and transportation in case of emergencies are adequate.

However, they say the fact that they did not find higher rates of severe complications among planned home births "should not lead to complacency" and that "every avoidable adverse maternal outcome is one too many."

Overall, they conclude: "Low risk women in primary care with planned at the onset of labour had a lower rate of severe acute maternal morbidity, postpartum haemorrhage, and manual removal of placenta than those with planned . These differences were statistically significant for parous women."

Explore further: Pregnant women at low risk of complications can safely be offered a choice of where to give birth

More information: www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.f3263

Related Stories

Cautions over rise in unbooked births

July 2, 2012

(Medical Xpress) -- The number of births that have occurred without medical assistance in Victoria have doubled over 17 years exposing more women and newborns to increased health risks, according to new research.

Birth is no reason to go to hospital, review says

September 19, 2012

A new Cochrane Review concludes that all countries should consider establishing proper home birth services. They should also provide low-risk pregnant women with information enabling them to make an informed choice. The review ...

Advocacy for planned home birth not in patients' best interest

November 13, 2012

Advocates of planned home birth have emphasized its benefits for patient safety, patient satisfaction, cost effectiveness, and respect for women's rights. A clinical opinion paper published in the American Journal of Obstetrics ...

Recommended for you

Does mom's cellphone startle the fetus?

May 6, 2015

(HealthDay)—The sounds emitted by cellphones carried by pregnant women may rattle the sleep-and-wake cycles of their fetuses, new research suggests.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.