Direct-to-consumer genetic testing kits vary in predictions of disease risk

July 17, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—An in-depth analysis and comparison study conducted by investigators at Emory's Rollins School of Public Health demonstrated variations in predicted disease risks by companies that offer direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Led by Cecile Janssens, PhD, research professor of Epidemiology, the team investigated DNA test results from three "direct- to-consumer" genome testing companies (23andMe, deCODEme, and Navigenics) to assess and compare their predictive abilities. Results show that predicted risks differed among the companies and were contradictory for certain traits in certain individuals.

The complete findings are available in the online edition of Genetics in Medicine.

"Although two of the companies that we studied are no longer operating, and sequencing is becoming less expensive and testing such as this is increasingly popular," explains Janssens. "The methods used for predicting these types of results are of important concern."

Test results provided by the three companies indicated an individual's risks for a large number of diseases. The study was conducted by creating DNA data for a hypothetical population of 100,000 individuals which is a less expensive and equally valid method for demonstrating the variations in predicted risk among the companies.

Predicted risks were calculated using the prediction methods of the three companies, obtained from their websites. Predicted risks were assessed and compared for six diseases: , prostate cancer, , Crohn disease, age-related , and .

The variations in predicted risks were explained by three factors:

  • The companies considered a different number of genetic variants in the risk calculations. Generally a larger difference in the number of variants implied more variation in predicted risks.
  • All three companies used an estimate for the average population disease risk as a starting point for their predictions. Differences in average risks affect predicted risks of all consumers to the same extent. For example, when the average odds is two times higher, all predicted odds are also two times higher.
  • The companies applied different mathematical formulas. The formulas of two companies led to an overestimation of risks when predicted risks were higher and even predicted risks that were higher than 100 percent.

"Our study provides insight into the methodology and performance of risk estimation for personal genome tests," Janssens explains. "Future efforts to design predictive models will benefit from understanding the strengths and limitations of these current models and formulas."

Explore further: DTC genetic tests neither accurate in their predictions nor beneficial to individuals

More information:

Related Stories

Genetic testing kits get closer look in Loyola study

July 15, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—Several companies sell genetic testing directly to consumers, but little research has been done on how consumers experience such tests. The tests have raised questions about the validity and accuracy of ...

Recommended for you

New class of RNA tumor suppressors identified

November 23, 2015

A pair of RNA molecules originally thought to be no more than cellular housekeepers are deleted in over a quarter of common human cancers, according to researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine. Breast cancer ...

Batten disease may benefit from gene therapy

November 11, 2015

In a study of dogs, scientists showed that a new way to deliver replacement genes may be effective at slowing the development of childhood Batten disease, a rare and fatal neurological disorder. The key may be to inject viruses ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.