Visual perception: Vertical disparity corrects stereo correspondence

August 27, 2013
Concentric (left) and radial (right) patterns with vertical magnification of one eye’s image used in the experiment. These patterns produced basically the same percept of surface slant although they contained different directions of local horizontal disparity.

It is well known that humans perceive 3D structures of scenes using the horizontal difference of images observed by our eyes— referred to as horizontal (binocular) disparity. It is also known that vertical disparity produces the sensation of surface slant about the vertical axis.

Intriguingly, it is not clear how the visual system uses vertical disparity for 3D perception. It could be used in the process of stereo correspondence, in the process of correcting horizontal disparity or in both processes.

Here, Hiroyuki Mitsudo and Ayumi Sakai at Kyushu University and Hirohiko Kaneko at Tokyo Institute of Technology report that vertical size disparity is used to correct stereo correspondence for the perception of surface slant.

Perceived slant of stereoscopic patterns consisting of random dots, concentric lines, and radial lines was measured. One of the two images was magnified vertically, in other words, vertical size disparity was introduced into the .

The results showed that despite the differences in the local horizontal disparity, perceived slants were similar for the three patterns.

The results are consistent with the idea that the visual system uses vertical disparity in the process of establishing local stereo correspondence.

Explore further: Two brain halves, one perception

More information: Mitsudo, H., Sakai, A. and Kaneko, H. Vertical size disparity and the correction of stereo correspondence, Perception 42, 385-400 (2013). (DOI): 10.1068/p7387

Related Stories

Two brain halves, one perception

September 1, 2011

Our brain is divided into two hemispheres, which are linked through only a few connections. However, we do not seem to have a problem to create a coherent image of our environment – our perception is not "split" in two ...

New evidence of an unrecognized visual process

November 24, 2011

(Medical Xpress) -- We don’t see only what meets the eye. The visual system constantly takes in ambiguous stimuli, weighs its options, and decides what it perceives. This normally happens effortlessly. Sometimes, however, ...

Recommended for you

In analyzing a scene, we make the easiest judgments first

September 3, 2015

Psychology researchers who have hypothesized that we classify scenery by following some order of cognitive priorities may have been overlooking something simpler. New evidence suggests that the fastest categorizations our ...

Forensic examiners pass the face matching test

September 1, 2015

The first study to test the skills of FBI agents and other law enforcers who have been trained in facial recognition has provided a reassuring result - they perform better than the average person or even computers on this ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.