Research shows that anti-fungal medicine may increase vulnerability to influenza and other viruses

Scientists at the University of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS) and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute have discovered evidence that a widely used anti-fungal medicine increases susceptibility to flu infection in mice and cell cultures. Published online in Cell Reports, the study shows that Amphotericin B, commonly given to cancer and bone marrow transplant patients to fight invasive fungal infections, neutralizes an important anti-viral protein, making it easier for viruses to infect cells.

These findings suggest that taking the antifungal therapy may be functionally immunocompromised and vulnerable to influenza and potentially other viruses.

"While these studies don't confirm that such an interaction may translate into clinical relevance for patients, it does suggest that some vigilance is warranted, especially for patients who are undergoing treatment for cancer and may already have suppressed immune systems," said Abraham Brass, MD, PhD, assistant professor of microbiology & physiological systems and senior author of the study.

Paul Kellam, PhD, professor from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and co-author of the study said, "This is an important discovery and the consequences for patients on certain anti-fungal treatments should now be investigated. Preventative flu vaccinations, rapid antiviral therapy or alternative anti-fungal treatment could be offered to these patients when at risk of flu infection."

Found in nearly all human cells, IFITM3 works to alter the cell membrane, making it more difficult for viruses, such as the influenza virus, to penetrate the cell's outer layer. When IFITM3 is inactive, influenza viruses can more readily infiltrate and infect the cell. Previous studies by Drs. Kellam and Brass and their colleagues have also shown that people who have a genetic variant in the IFITM3 gene are more susceptible to influenza.

Brass and his lab were working to understand how IFITM3 protects cells from viral infection when they discovered the link between Amphotericin B and influenza. "Several in the lab became contaminated with a fungus," said Brass. "We treated them with Amphotericin B, not knowing it would have an effect on IFITM3 activity. Surprisingly, when we tested for influenza infection we found no IFITM3 activity in the normal, wild type, cells. At that point, we began to suspect that Amphotericin B was having an effect on IFITM3."

This unexpected revelation opened up a new line of inquiry that revealed that Amphotericin B was preventing IFITM3 from fending off the influenza virus. "When we treated lung cancer cells with the anti-fungal drug, we saw the anti-viral protection normally provided by IFITM3 disappear," said Christopher R. Chin, research associate in the Brass lab and co-first author of the study.

To better appreciate the effects Amphotericin B has on IFITM3, Brass teamed up with Kellam to treat mice with the anti-fungal drug. The pair found that once the mice contracted influenza, they displayed the same, more severe flu symptoms as mice completely lacking the protective IFITM3 gene. In the absence of the virus, the mice treated with the Amphotericin B showed no signs of illness.

This research indicates that patients undergoing Amphotericin B anti-fungal treatments could potentially lose the protective effects of IFITM3, increasing the risk of infections in patients with already compromised immune systems.

"Sometimes a very useful drug can also have unforeseen effects," said Brass. "We now see that a major part of the body's natural defenses to is rendered inactive by Amphotericin B in cells and mice. It's our hope that reporting the consequences of this interaction may stimulate further translational studies and potentially guide patient care."

Both Kellam and Brass agree that further work is now needed to evaluate if this effect has any clinical significance for patients receiving Amphotericin B-based treatments.

More information: Cell Reports, Lin et al.: "Amphotericin B Increases Influenza A Virus Infection by Preventing IFITM3-mediated Restriction." dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.10.033

Related Stories

New findings into conquering influenza

Jan 29, 2013

Reseachers from the University of Melbourne and The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI) have discovered a new protein that protects against viral infections such as influenza.

Study reveals natural process that blocks viruses

Apr 17, 2013

The human body has the ability to ward off viruses by activating a naturally occurring protein at the cellular level, setting off a chain reaction that disrupts the levels of cholesterol required in cell membranes to enable ...

Fatty acids could lead to flu drug

Mar 07, 2013

Flu viruses are a major cause of death and sickness around the world, and antiviral drugs currently do not protect the most seriously ill patients. A study published March 7th by Cell Press in the journal Cell reveals that a ...

Recommended for you

Long wait yet for Ebola vaccine: experts

2 hours ago

It will be months, at least, before a vaccine becomes available to tackle Ebola, experts said Thursday as researchers reported success in early, safety tests with a leading candidate.

Sierra Leone to miss target for beating Ebola: UN

2 hours ago

The United Nations' Ebola response mission admitted Thursday it was going to miss its target for beating the deadly epidemic in Sierra Leone due to a chronic shortage of hospital beds.

Global Ebola toll rises to 5,689: WHO

7 hours ago

The World Health Organization said Thursday that the global death toll from the Ebola virus had increased to 5,689 out of a total of 15,935 cases of infection, mainly in western Africa.

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.