British neuroscientist proposes drug alternatives to alcohol for drinkers

by Bob Yirka weblog
Wine

(Medical Xpress)—Former chair of Britain's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, David Nutt is on a mission. He and his team at Imperial College in London are convinced that developing drugs that simulate the sensations that arise in people when drinking alcoholic beverages is an idea whose time has come. Nutt has been espousing his ideas to the British press (including the BBC) and to online magazines.

Drinking alcohol is a dangerous business, there's no arguing that. Not only does it cause people to crash when driving, it lowers inhibitions causing people to engage in risky behavior. As if all that weren't enough, more than casual use can lead to liver and/or brain damage. Nutt notes that if alcohol were invented today, every nation would outlaw its production and use. But since that's not going to happen, he's advocating it be replaced by other, safer types of drugs.

More specifically, he's suggesting the development of drugs that specifically target subsystems of the neurotransmitter system—the one that's involved in producing the warm relaxed buzz when exposed to alcohol. Such drugs are of the class known as benzodiazepines—others include Xanax and Valium. Nutt says such drugs could be developed that have all the advantages of alcohol, without the negatives. People could get "drunk" without a follow-up hangover. They could also do so as often as they want without getting addicted or hurting their bodies in other ways. Better yet, because such drugs would target the brain directly, antidotes for them could be made as well. That would mean taking a pill before getting in the car to kill the buzz and allow for immediate safe driving.

Unfortunately, as Nutt has found, there are few in the spirits business willing to sponsor his research—there's a lot of money being made selling after all. Undaunted, Nutt has noted that there is a precedent—not too long ago cigarette companies refused to even think about getting in the e-cigarette business, now most of them are the very companies making and selling them.

Nutt has said that he's narrowed down five components that could be used to make the faux alcohol and has even tested them on himself. The only thing stopping him, he claims, is lack of capital for research. It's not entirely clear if Nutt's media marketing campaign will work (or if he's considered setting up a crowd-sourcing project) but if it does, he at least seems convinced that it would mean the end of many of the problems associated with use and abuse.

More information: via The Guardian

Related Stories

New 'matrix of harm' for drugs of abuse

Mar 23, 2007

A new study published today in the Lancet proposes that drugs should be classified by the amount of harm that they do, rather than the sharp A, B, and C divisions in the UK Misuse of Drugs Act.

Making sense of addiction terminology

Feb 03, 2012

A new editorial released this week offers clarity and structure on confusing drug and alcohol addiction terminology for prescribers, users and regulators. "Through a glass darkly: can we improve clarity about mechanism and ...

Recommended for you

With kids in school, parents can work out

14 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Back-to-school time provides an opportunity for parents to develop an exercise plan that fits into the family schedules, an expert suggests.

Obama offers new accommodations on birth control

18 hours ago

The Obama administration will offer a new accommodation to religious nonprofits that object to covering birth control for their employees. The measure allows those groups to notify the government, rather than their insurance ...

Use a rule of thumb to control how much you drink

18 hours ago

Sticking to a general rule of pouring just a half glass of wine limits the likelihood of overconsumption, even for men with a higher body mass index. That's the finding of a new Iowa State and Cornell University ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Eikka
1 / 5 (1) Nov 12, 2013
"Nutt notes that if alcohol were invented today, every nation would outlaw its production and use. "


I note that many nations did outlaw its production and use at various stages of history. And then promptly reversed the decision.

"People could get "drunk" without a follow-up hangover. They could also do so as often as they want without getting addicted or hurting their bodies in other ways. "


And so they would, too much so because without immediate ill consequences there would be little moderation as to when and how much one should be drunk. As a consequence, people would become rather dull and slow witted, which is another kind of harm that is readily apparent in the other kind of drug that doesn't leave a hangover: cannabis.
krundoloss
not rated yet Nov 12, 2013
Sounds like Synthahol from Star Trek, TNG.
gjbloom
5 / 5 (1) Nov 12, 2013
Benzodiazepines? The class of drugs whose sudden withdrawal can cause convulsions, psychosis, catatonia, and even death? Sure. I mean, what could possibly go wrong with that?
LaPortaMA
not rated yet Nov 12, 2013
Dumb-as-dirt idea demonstrating no understanding of the dis-ease of alcoholism.
To wit, we were warned against doing this in treating alcoholics in 1977.
andyrdj
not rated yet Nov 17, 2013
"Dumb-as-dirt idea demonstrating no understanding of the dis-ease of alcoholism.
To wit, we were warned against doing this in treating alcoholics in 1977."


Please expound in detail why you think this is so - it's too interesting an issue to just leave it as an off the cuff remark. What tests, for example, have been done that would hint at a new drug's likely ineffectiveness - you are certainly making a bold claim given that the new drug isn't even there on the table to analyse.