Antidepressant use during pregnancy not linked to autism

by Amy Norton, Healthday Reporter
Antidepressant use during pregnancy not linked to autism
Large study finds little connection between mother's use of drugs like Prozac and children's autism risk.

(HealthDay)—Despite some concerns to the contrary, children whose moms used antidepressants during pregnancy do not appear to be at increased risk of autism, a large new Danish study suggests.

The results, published Dec. 19 in the New England Journal of Medicine, offer some reassurance, experts said.

There have been some hints that called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) could be linked to autism. SSRIs are the "first-line" drug against depression, and include medications such as fluoxetine (Prozac), sertraline (Zoloft), citalopram (Celexa) and paroxetine (Paxil).

In one recent U.S. study, mothers' SSRI use during pregnancy was tied to a twofold increase in the odds that her child would have autism. A Swedish study saw a similar pattern, though the risk linked to the drugs was smaller.

But both studies included only small numbers of children who had autism and were exposed to antidepressants in the womb.

The new study is "the largest to date" to look at the issue, using records for more than 600,000 children born in Denmark, said lead researcher Anders Hviid, of the Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen.

And overall, his team found, there was no clear link between SSRI use during pregnancy and children's autism risk.

Hviid cautioned that the finding is still based on a small number of children who had autism and prenatal exposure to an SSRI—52, to be exact. The researchers noted that it's not possible to rule out a small increase in autism risk.

But, Hviid said, "at this point, I do not think this potential association should feature prominently when evaluating the risks and benefits of SSRI use in pregnancy."

Commenting on the findings, Christina Chambers, director of the Center for the Promotion of Maternal Health and Infant Development at the University of California, San Diego, stated, "I think this study is reassuring."

One "important" point, Chambers added, is that the researchers factored in mothers' diagnoses—which ranged from depression to eating disorders to schizophrenia.

"How much of the risk is related to the medication, and how much is related to the underlying condition?" Chambers said. "It's hard to tease out."

In theory, she noted, depression or other mental health disorders could contribute to autism risk because those moms may be more likely to make unhealthy lifestyle choices, such as smoking or drinking.

In this study, Hviid's team did initially see a slightly increased risk of autism among children whose mothers used SSRIs during pregnancy. But once the researchers factored in the psychiatric disorders themselves, that statistical link fell away.

On top of that, there was a slight increase in autism risk among children whose mothers had used an SSRI in the two years before pregnancy, but not during pregnancy.

Hviid said that all suggests it's the underlying conditions, rather than the drugs, that are associated with a small autism risk—though the reasons, he added, are unknown.

The study, which was funded by the Danish government, is based on records from Denmark's national system of health databases. Of nearly 627,000 children born between 1996 and 2005, just under 3,900 were later diagnosed with autism.

Among those children, 52 were born to mothers who filled an SSRI prescription during pregnancy. There were just over 6,000 other children whose mothers used the antidepressants during but did not develop autism.

Both Hviid and Chambers said the findings do not prove that SSRIs carry no autism risk. And a connection is biologically plausible, Hviid said.

No one knows what causes autism, which affects an estimated one in 88 . But it involves a disruption in fetal brain development. It's thought that serotonin—the chemical that SSRIs target—contributes to early brain development, and in animals, altered serotonin levels can affect brain function and behavior.

"It's still worthwhile to continue to study this," Chambers said.

But, she added, based on the human studies so far, "if there is any increased risk of autism, it appears small."

And for any one woman, Chambers said, that possible risk would have to be balanced against the risks of leaving major depression untreated.

"For some women, the optimal situation may be to take an SSRI, even if there is an association [with ]," Chambers said.

Hviid agreed, saying that's a decision that has to be left up to women and their health care provider.

More information: The non-profit MotherToBaby California has more on medication use during pregnancy.

Paper Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Related Stories

Recommended for you

How does the brain develop in individuals with autism?

Nov 12, 2014

Geneticists at Heidelberg University Hospital's Department of Molecular Human Genetics have used a new mouse model to demonstrate the way a certain genetic mutation is linked to a type of autism in humans and affects brain ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mike_Massen
not rated yet Dec 19, 2013
In last 3 months of pregnancy the fetus takes a sizable amount of copper from the mother, such that the fetus' liver has approx 4 times that of an adult at birth.

Angiogenesis is dependent on good copper levels in the mother and then for transfer to the fetus, especially for the young immature brain there is a matching necessary of neurons/neural pathway & capillary growth.

Without sufficient copper during the first 18months or so the baby's brain may not develop well with respect to brain growth/nutrients in relation to capillaries.

If the mother is copper deficient, as some 80% are on a typical processed western diet, then the baby is likely to also be deficient...

Homeostatic levels of keys minerals are very important, for copper its 100ug/Kg/Day.

For an average male of 70Kg that represents 7mG/day, yet most on a typical western diet would be lucky to get 300 micro grams/day - isnt this a huge disparity ?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.