FDA's voluntary antibiotics guidelines fail to protect public health

December 12, 2013 by Tim Parsons

Experts at the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future (CLF), say that new Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voluntary guidelines on antibiotic use in food animal production are unlikely to reduce the widespread use of the drugs in food animals or address the public health crisis of increasing antibiotic resistance. Decades of scientific research, including studies led by CLF researchers, have linked the misuse of antibiotics in food animals to rising antibiotic resistance in human pathogens.

Guidance for Industry #213, the FDA document released today that outlines the new guidelines, asks drug companies to voluntarily withdraw approvals to use in food animals for "growth promotion," while keeping approvals to use these drugs for "disease prevention." In both cases, antibiotics are fed to animals at low doses, often throughout their lives, making bacteria resistant to drugs used to treat infections.

"Problems can arise whenever antibiotics are fed to animals at low doses for long periods of time," said Keeve Nachman, PhD, MHS, a CLF scientist with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health's departments of Environmental Health Sciences and Health Policy and Management. "Whether you call it growth promotion or disease prevention, this makes antibiotics less effective for treating sick people."

Many antibiotics are approved for both growth promotion and disease prevention at similarly low doses and without limits on how long they may be used. This means that even if all growth promotion approvals were withdrawn voluntarily, many antibiotics could still be used in similar ways. Under the guidelines, drug companies and the food animal industry could label such use "disease prevention."

"The FDA may care whether companies call it growth promotion or disease prevention, but the bacteria do not," said Nachman. "If antibiotics are used in the same ways, they will have the same effects."'"The widespread misuse of antibiotics in food animal production reduces the effectiveness of drugs we heavily rely on to keep the public and our families safe," said Robert Lawrence, MD, director of CLF and a professor with the Bloomberg School's Department of Environmental Health Sciences. "An infection that is now considered relatively easy to treat could once again prove fatal should antibiotics continue to be misused in food animal production and exacerbate this growing crisis."

"The agency needs to change how antibiotics are used, but these guidelines will only change how they are labeled," adds Nachman. "Instead of issuing voluntary guidelines, the FDA should use its regulatory authority to protect public health by withdrawing all approvals to use antibiotics for and growth promotion."

Explore further: Canada should ban off-label antibiotic use in agriculture: CMAJ

Related Stories

Antibiotics – friend and foe?

November 18, 2013

European Antibiotic Awareness Day is marked on the 18th November every year. This year in Norway, a seminar for health care providers about antibiotic use and resistance will be held, as well as several local events around ...

Global effort is needed to keep antibiotics working

November 19, 2013

A global approach is needed to address the unfolding burden of antibiotic resistance, say the authors of a new report, published this week in Lancet Infectious Diseases. The report coincides with the European Antibiotic Awareness ...

Recommended for you

Drunk driving laws don't match the research

July 25, 2016

Emergency physicians learn to be prepared for anything thrown at us in the clinical arena. Personal life is a different story. Last year a drunk driver with multiple prior offenses and no valid driver's license smashed a ...

How to increase the fat burned during exercise

July 19, 2016

During exercise, oxidation of fat and carbohydrates depends on the intensity and duration of the activity. A new study analyses the effect of consuming an alkaloid, p-synephrine, on the burning of lipids and refutes the value ...

Clock controls junk food appeal

July 22, 2016

When it comes to extra kilojoules, a little more self-restraint won't go astray as the day progresses. New research from Flinders University and Liverpool University has studied the urge to snack more later in the day, even ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.