JC metric accurate for elective early-term delivery

December 14, 2013
JC metric accurate for elective early-term delivery

(HealthDay)—The exclusion criteria for the current Joint Commission (JC) measure PC-01 identify most valid indications, represented by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, for planned early-term deliveries, according to research published online Dec. 6 in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Steven L. Clark, M.D., of the Hospital Corporation of America in Nashville, Tenn., and colleagues reviewed 205 cases of elective early-term deliveries that were noncompliant with JC metric PC-01 to determine the completeness of the exclusion criteria list.

The researchers found that 55 percent of compliance fallouts involved stated indications that were not recognized by the medical community. For the remaining cases, 25 percent had valid indications not represented by an ICD-9-CM code; 10 percent resulted from valid indications represented by ICD-9-CM codes not included on the JC exclusion list; 8 percent resulted from imprecise physician charting; and 2 percent represented chart abstraction errors. Because of the small denominator of cases that meet the current JC ICD-9-CM code criteria for indicated elective early-term deliveries, even one justified outlier each quarter would drop compliance rates below a 95 percent benchmark for about 60 percent of facilities.

"Our data validate the current JC exclusion criteria for this measure, which identify the vast majority of valid indications for early-term delivery used by obstetrician-gynecologists and identifiable with ICD-9-CM codes," the authors write. "Finally, we caution against statistically invalid comparisons and benchmarking using this metric, which could discredit and diminish the acceptance of this vital performance measure."

One author is an employee of the Joint Commission.

Explore further: ICD-9 codes underestimate statin-linked rhabdomyolysis

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Related Stories

ICD-9 codes underestimate statin-linked rhabdomyolysis

April 18, 2012

(HealthDay) -- Use of diagnostic codes, such as International Classification of Diseases -- Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, may result in misclassification of rare, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including the risk of rhabdomyolysis ...

AAFP, other physician groups request stop to ICD-10

January 15, 2013

(HealthDay)—The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) has joined the American Medical Association and other physician organizations to request that the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) halt implementation ...

Practices are not prepared for implementation of ICD-10

June 20, 2013

(HealthDay)—Physician practices have made little progress in preparing for implementation of the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), according to a report published by the Medical Group ...

Model predicts risk of adverse events for ICD implantation

December 12, 2013

(HealthDay)—A simple model may be used to predict risk for in-hospital adverse events among patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), according to research published online Dec. 11 in the Journal ...

Recommended for you

Does mom's cellphone startle the fetus?

May 6, 2015

(HealthDay)—The sounds emitted by cellphones carried by pregnant women may rattle the sleep-and-wake cycles of their fetuses, new research suggests.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.